Audrina Patridge Is a PETA Angel
April 23, 2009 in Audrina Patridge, Body Type and Clothes, Photoshop Job by Versus
Khloe Kardashian did it a few months back and now it’s yet another reality star’s turn: Here’s Audrina Patridge’s PETA ad.
Umm… why is her skin pink… and shadows-free?
And here’s a less photoshopped Audrina at the event, where she wore an ivory jumpsuit:
How do you like her poster look? And how do you like the jumpsuit on Audrina’s skinny figure?
I rly, and I mean REALLY love animals but I just hate Peta’s manipulative ads..Since when bying animals means killing them??It’s like someone said “always adopt children, giving birth means killing poor kids in Africa”…On another note, she looks good, I supose
¬¬ is so stupid what you just say.
peta says that never BUY a animal, it’s no related with giving bith means killing and whatevr you said… cus buy an animal goes against its right, it’s like somebody selling a kid.
i cant say my idea very well cus i don’t speak english so perfect, but anyway
I think that what you said is stupid. that’s my point
You should improve your English (in case you wonder it is not my native language either) before so easily saying something is stupid. Clearly, I have no clue what are you trying to say. My point was just because something is for good cause is NOT good to manipulate people with such powerful words as “killing” and other controversial shock tactics.
Well Khloe was just gorgeus but Audrina is just pure uglyness and trash.
[...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptKhloe Kardashian did it a few months back and now it’s yet another reality star’s turn: Here’s Audrina Patridge’s PETA ad. Umm… why is her skin pink… and shadows-free? And here’s a less photoshopped Audrina at the event, where she wore an ivory jumpsuit: How do you like her poster look? And how do you like the jumpsuit on Audrina’s skinny figure? © Versus for Skinny VS Curvy , 2009. | Permalink | No comment Tags: fake , lingerie , Photoshop , skin Related posts [...]
first of all, i dont understand why PETA needs to use overly sexual images to sell their message…it seems like they have more respect for animals than they do for women.
Second, it looks nothing like her!! if you hadn’t told me that was Audrina Partridge in the picture, I never would have guessed….what’s the point of paying famous people millions of dollars to participate in these ads if you are going to photoshop them to the point where they don’t even look like themselves…you might as well just use random people. i dont get it!
excellent point(s).
AGREED!!!!
But, what happens to all the animals that don’t get bought
Love Audrina body clearly photoshopped but her body is AMAZING in real life too !!
Hello wannabe Victoria’s Secret Angel! There is something odd about how she is holding the dog… It looks like there is no weight to it, maybe it was photoshopped in too.
LOL @ VS Angel comment. I thought the same thing! haha This pic wins the photo shopped aware for the month!
although there’s no shadows and what not, she looks good. the whole idea is she’s supposed to be an angel, so the lack of shadows and airbrushing doesn’t surprise me. on another note, i truly despise peta.
Stupid poster, awesome pantsuit.
There should be written in a poster:
“Just Audrina – always trashy”.
hAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH sooo fAKE
She looks nice but PETA is horrible. We do not need extremists anywhere. BTW, what are her handbag and shoes made of? Some leather there??
She has amazing arms in the second pic!
The PETA ad does not look
real. Almost like a
painting. The other
picture hmm. Something
is wrong. Her face looks
unnatural.
Wow, this is so hypocritical. PETA– please do not use celebrities to send your messages. I’m sure Audrina is not a vegetarian or vegan, wears UGG boots (made from sheep), wears leather (made from cows), wears cashmere (made from goats), wears wool (from sheep), and sweaters with rabbit hair…The list goes on and on. So Audrina is NOT a real animal activist. It takes a lot of faith and power to follow these rules. She is just a celebrity that can sell messages. So she is being used by PETA because of her celebrity power, NOT her animal-loving characteristics.
whatever she looks amazing in that pantsuit