 |
 |
 |
Here is British girlband Girls Aloud in a calendar for 2009, aiming to look as hot and as sexy as possible. And no, the above golden dresses are not the tiny outfits I was talking about, so make sure you turn the page…
This one is sort of like our classic Skinny Versus Curvy Battle, but with a little twist. Why? Because Cheryl is more than skinny and Nicole is fit & shapely, rather than curvy.
So, which body type do you prefer? The fragile looking Cheryl that is looking underweight even in the unforgiving high-waisted jeans or the strong and healthy looking Nicole with round hips and thighs?
Super skinny versus shapely! Cheryl Cole versus Nicole Scherzinger!
Photo source: Gecce
Wow, that arm looks painful. Painfully thin, that is. Plus, those tiny tiny legs aren’t exactly the poster for “health”.
The conclusion? Well, even though Cheryl seemed to have passed the stress period (that caused the weight loss in the first place), the lbs (or the stones, as they say in UK) aren’t coming back anytime soon.
Have your say!
Photo credit: Wenn
Let me make it easy for you:
Both girls are in their early 20’s, fact which makes them perfect competitors.
Both girls are wearing short white dresses that reveal their legs.
Cheryl is very skinny, Kristin is “just” skinny.
Both have skinny legs, but Kristin’s have a little more “consistence”.
Conclusion: Cheryl Cole versus Kristin Cavallari – Who’s got better legs?
Photo source: Celebutopia
We’ve seen how skinny Cheryl Cole has gotten lately, but not through clothes – in a bikini. In case you didn’t get to see her wearing something close to nothing, click here!
Now, what do we have here? On the left, we’ve got a healthier and more feminine version of Cheryl before the weight loss that got many tabloid covers in the UK. On the right, we’ve got a skinny Cheryl, with much narrower hips, thinner arms, reduced thighs and overall a smaller and more fragile frame.
So, here’s a question for you: Where does she look better?
Photo source: Celeb Utopia, Daily Mail
