Picture 1: Angelina in June 2007, before getting pregnant with twins.
Picture 2: Angelina on 4th of October 2008, at the New York Film Festival.
Even though post-baby bodies are actual nightmares to oh so many women, Angelina’s got luck and genes on her side this time, too, since she’s looking likeÂ a million times better on the right. We get hips instead of a scrawny figure and fuller b~~~~ instead of chest bones.
A perfectÂ “Skinny Versus Slim with Curves” case!, with a pretty obvious winner. Feel free to agree (or disagree)!
More pictures of the curvier Angelina after the jump! Read more
Incoming search terms:b~~~~ before and after pregnancy
, angelina jolie after pregnancy
, angelina jolie before and after
, angelina jolie pregnant b~~~~
, b~~~~ before and after pregnancy pictures
It looks like Victoria’s closet is full of red dresses – well, what better way to show off your tiny figure (that definitely requires all sorts of sacrifices) if not in the most eye-popping color of all?
Which one is your favorite as-red-as-it-gets dress? And while you’re at it, let’s hear your thoughts on Posh’s ever-changing hairstyles and never-changing skinny figure!
Incoming search terms:victoria beckham dresses
, victoria beckham red dress
So here’s Beyonce in June 2007 and then here’s Beyonce in October 2008. Few fast ideas:
1. First bikini bra appears to be a size too small, yet manages to create a very “booby look”. Second one (even though popular and trendy) is not the most flattering one you could chooseÂ .
2. Beyonce’s waist looks a little more sculpted on the left – or that’s what I am guessing, considering that the orange stuff is strtategicallyÂ positioned (intentionally or not).
3. TheÂ actual difference I see here is not body-related, but more like: How glamorous Beyonce looks on the left (makeup, earrings, hairstyle, bikini) and how relaxed and worry-free she appears to be on the right.
Click for more “Now” pictures!
Brand new idea just popped in my head: let’s put curvy Lindsay and skinny Lindsay in a battle! Better yet, let’s put Lindsay’sÂ shapely bikini body against Lindsay’sÂ tiny bikini body.
And for optimal relevance,Â take a look atÂ the booty perspective in order to give your verdict.
Need I point out the differences between the two Lindsays? I’ll say the curvy Lindsay has gotÂ 20+ lbs more than skinny LindsayÂ , distributed pretty evenly all around: b~~~~, hips, thighs, stomach, arms.
This should be fun: Bikini Body Battle! Old Lindsay Versus New Lindsay! Choose your favorite!
Incoming search terms:lindsay lohan curvy
, lindsay lohan body measurements
Even the hottest models that made it on Sport Illustrated covers (multiple times), appeared in Playboy and haveÂ worked most of their lives in their bikini or sexy lingerie, posing in sexy photoshoots – even they can start looking less like long legged, ideally shaped,Â skinny women. Case and point (no, I’m not gonna say Tyra Banks): Rachel Hunter, who besides being a famous model, is an actress and Rod Stewart’s ex wife.
Rachel’sÂ weight didn’t exactly pop up over night. One year ago, Rachel was contacted by Slim-Fast, in order to become their spokesperson – and no, she didn’t look as (or bigger than) in the picture on the right, since she was 5’10” and 147 lbs. “Only” 147Â (compared to average women)Â but “a whooping” 147 (compared to average models).
As for her recent weight gain, Rachel says that it’s muscle and not fat. How so? Apparently, it is all “thanks” to the new circus acts she’s been performing for a celebrity circus show (is there a show they haven’t invented yet?)
What are your thoughts?
Incoming search terms:rachel hunter weight gain
, rachel hunter fat
, Rachel hunter measurements
, rachel hunter weight gain 2010
, rachel hunter now
, where is rachel hunter now
, Rachel Hunter weight
, rachel hunter vs
, rachel hunter height weight
, barbie bentons then and now