Marisa Miller in a Bikini, Part 2
January 20, 2009 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Front and Back, Hot Models, Marisa Miller by Versus
New bikini (2 new ones, actually - see on the next page) and new perspectives! If you didn’t catch bikini no. 1, click here!
I know you’re wondering, so here are Marisa’s measurements, as listed on her official website:
Height: 5’8” (173 cm)
Weight: 110 lbs. (50 kg)
Measurements: 34-23-35 (86-58-89 cm)
Dress Size: US 2
Her body is so unusually fat-free… like she had all of the fat sucked out of her.
Not saying someone can’t be that skinny, but there are so many unusual contours that you ordinarily see on skinny women.
she’s just perfect
isn’t 110 pounds at 5’8 wayyyy underweight on the BMI?
Yes, it is – BMI 16,7… But that’s what is listed on her official website.
Yes, it is. Even for a small framed 5’8″ woman, that is underweight by approximately 16 lbs. or so(BMI has her 12 lbs. underweight, but BMI isn’t the best guide, IMO, only good if you are a small or medium framed individual, it doesn’t even take gender into consideration
).
i think 110 is a slight underestimate…i’m also 5’8 and at about 120 lbs my body looks very close to hers…i’d say that she’s more like 115
i think also that she can’t have 50 kg
i’ve 172cm and my weight is 52kg and i think i look slimmer than she.
she looks health , i’am not.
please i’m 5’5″ weight 120 and i look her size in weight minus the height. i doubt she is 110.. i think they all lie..she looks good, thin but good but only if thats natural for her
[...] Secret Model Marisa Miller in a bikini [SkinnyvsCurvy] Related Stories: Thursday’s Daily Hot Gossip!Wednesday’s Hot Celebrity [...]
that certainly is underweight according to the BMI scale but she doesn’t look underweight at all. she still has plenty of muscle tone and her bones aren’t poking out everywhere. like missy said she still has a lot of contours for such a thin woman. i have a few friends who would register as underweight on the BMI scale but they are just tall and slenderly built females.
Yeah.. with that much height and boobage I don’t think she can be 110, 115 probably, nonetheless very thin and gorgeous! I would kill to look like her
she is so not 110. that’s like kate moss’ weight and kate is a few inches shorter than marisa
kate moss is 105:p
ymm i dnt think that she weights 50 kg…
i weight 50 kg im a little bit shorter and i think im slimmer,..
but anyway shes georgeus^^
Marisa, I love her.she can do not wrong, everyone tells littlet ewhite lies now then. she still a angel in victoria secret heaven:P
I have a similar shape to marissa,and I’m 5’5 and 115 lbs. in fact if i was 110lbs, i would be considered under weight. thus there is no way a person that 5’8 and look the ways she does, i’l say she be 125 lbs with bmi of 19.
I don’t like in the first bandeau bikini b/c it doesn’t compliment her gorgeous figure.
I’ve read that most models have their heights rounded up and their weights rounded down on their profiles anywhere so that people don’t reject them for work based upon it (or something similar to that). I’ve heard the same from those that meet a lot of models in their work. They say models are always shorter than what it says on any profile anywhere. Weight is harder to judge, but somehow I find it hard to believe that a woman that tall weighs only a tiny bit more than I do when she is half a foot taller… Half a foot of extra body can’t weigh only a few pounds!
I just noticed something weird. My measurements are exactly the same as hers, save plus 2 inches to the waist, and yet my boobs look much smaller and my hips look much curvier than hers. Maybe because I’m 5’2″, but then the boobs looking smaller doesn’t make sense. Shouldn’t the same measurement on a smaller person look BIGGER than how it looks on a tall person? :s
I see what you are saying, but it is also a matter of bone structure – your back is probably a little wider than Marisa’s (she has a very small bone structure, her torso is very narrow, her shoulders are narrow, etc.).
Measuring your bust also implies measuring yourself around the back – and someone with a narrow back and huge breasts might end up having the same bust circumference number as someone with a broad back and tiny breasts.
Hope I helped
Wow! That was informative for everyone
Thanks for the reply! Still, I can only find a rumour that she is a 34C. I’m a 30C, so my back is smaller than hers if that is true. Though comparing with her shape her ribcage is more or less rectangular whereas mine is more a V-shape, so maybe that’s it!
30C is smaller on the back and boobs than a 34C. That MM is probably a much smaller band than 34 and therefore a bigger cup size than C…..34C = 32D = 30DD = 28E.
On her website, she lists her bust at 34″ total and that is what she’s listed with her agency. My guess is she’s either a 30D or an odd measurement of 31C. Either way, she does have large breasts for her build, which is probably why so many women desire to have her figure. Problem is, it’s unattainable for most women.
If you are a 30C, congrats! I would love to be that petite, but it’s just not in the cards for me:(
She does have a “perfect” body, but I find her bland for some reason. These pics don’t really make an impression on me.
I’m so jealous. If she’s 5’8″ and 110… I feel like crap. She’s a toothpick and I’m beyond jealous.
I’m so torn…..she looks fantastic…toned, tight, curvy in the right places…but only 110 at 5’8”?!
That seems VERY low, unhealthily low…It makes me curious how she would look in real life…if I would say, “Yikes, you are too skinny, have an ice cream cone!”
I don’t think she’s 5’8 at all. There’s proof that she’s way way shorter than that- and in these pictures she doesn’t look it either. But her body is still bangin’!
I have no problem believing she is 5’8 (more likely 5’7 1/2) at 110 lbs. I have the exact same stats and I’m a little thinner than her in these photos however I don’t think I work out as much as she does, so she may just have more muscle mass.
I think these photos may have been airbrushed-trust me you never no what pictures are and aren’t. also everyone that has met marisa says she is 5’6″ MAX and more like 100 pounds. also i think the other models have their heights lied about to.
source: celebheights.com
That site is used by ppl who r ugly big and jelous, not reliable. she is 5’8, we measure her for outfits
These weights and heights and not accurate. People lie about their weights all the time. She would look like death at that weight.
5’6″ and 100 pounds= marisa miller
remember the camera adds 10 pounds
I love the fact that Marisa just looks so natural in the first picture with no makeup and hair slicked back. She looks like a true beach-loving surfer chick…healthy and happy…it rocks!
So maybe she really is 5’8 but DEFINATELLY not 110 lbs. I’m more toned then her in legs and arms – stomachs, boobs and butt are equall. I’m 5’4 and 117 lbs. You just CANNOT look that way without having muscle and muscle weights more. She would have a lot slimmer and flabbier look in order to be 110. hell when i drop to 113 i look skinny. silly skinny ! Not strong at all. I hate that they post 110 for her stats cause it makes women wanna drop pounds at the sacrafice of their muscle. Besides that she has a beautifull figure and i love the way she carries herself – awesome girl 4 sure !
Don’t know why I’m replying to posts that are months old, but she doesn’t actually have a lot of muscle just a low percentage of body fat. There is a difference.
she’s got like the most perfect butt! All the VS models do.
perfect butt???? pleaseeeeeee
i am 5’8 an weigh 121 and i look bigger than her, her leggs are very small you have to take body fat into consideration and being in a bikni makes you look bigger if she was clothed she would look like a stick yes she is 110
Oh my god I’m jealous.
She ISN”T 5’8. Just check out celebheights.com EVERYONE that has met her says just barley 5’6″-most pople say her weight is aboot 102 to 103 pounds. You guys have to remeber that these photos could have been airbrushed (fyi every photo that has karolina kurkova has a belly button the picture HAS been airbrushed. Also when the photographer shoots upward the model/actress can look several inches taller.
she is an insparation!
I actually don’t think these pics have been airbrushed – you can still see all of the moles/beauty marks that she has on her body, particularly the large one on her thigh. Don’t they normally airbrush those off? I think her body is close to perfect – a body that both wome and men admire b/c she is very slim and toned, but still curvy. However, I think she might look slightly better with just a couple more pounds of fat on her, b/c her body is so “perfect” that it almost looks harsh/unnatural.
I think they have been airbrushed-just not heavily.
I’ve seen her in person and I don’t think she’s 5’8″, more like 5’6″, she’s sooo tiny, a little too tiny for my taste and she has quite a bit of sun damage to her face. Her boobs aren’t nearly as big as they are in pictures, photoshop and push-up bikinis turn her chest into D’s but I think she’s more like a C. I have to admit that I envy her small waist and nice butt however, I wouldn’t want to be that tiny.
Yeah but ur not a model ur ugly, taller but ugly
I completely disagree with the assumption that she is a C cup. I have natural D cup breasts and a small frame, and mine look the same size on me. However, when people see me in a bikini or without a push up bra they don’t believe my boobs are that big. Why? Because fake breasts have COMPLETELY warped people’s opinions of what breasts should look like! Implants are always super round, high and hard and therefore D sized fakies look much bigger than a natural D cup. It’s kind of sick.
Angie, I have D cups as well and I was standing next to her at a restaurant and hers were definitely smaller than mine. Her frame is WAY smaller than mine. When tiny women have breasts, they tend to appear larger than they are because their frames are so slight. She could be a D but I seriously doubt it. But we’ll never know.
D cups are not a definitive size on their own.
Cup size means nothing without a band size. 28D is much smaller than 38D on both the back size and cup volume.
With such a slight frame she’s probably a 28 band and considering she has very large breasts for her frame she would be at least an E if not an F cup. If she was a 34 band this would be the size cup volume as a C-D cup.
Sorry I’m replying to this so late but I didn’t see it until today. I know what you’re saying about band and cup size, I understand all of that. Bras sizes can be so tricky. I’ve been measured professionally and was told I had a 34 band size but to me, it’s too tight, so I go up to a 36.
I don’t know about her, in some pics she looks like a C and then some pics she looks like a D, depending on various factors obviously! When I saw her in person, her boobs looked a lot smaller. She could be anywhere from a C to an E but who really knows? Push up bras and fitted shirts can do wonders for breasts!
Don’t worry Kae, I only just wrote it lol.
MM would probably be a C/D cup if she was in a 34 band, but I think we all know she’s probably no more than a 30 band hence the larger cup size.
Oops, I didn’t look at the date of your reply! I agree that she definitely has a smaller band size and larger cup size, whatever they may be.
No, no– I agree with you. Smaller women with big breasts = breasts appearing larger. I also agree that she is definitely not 5’8″. My point was that I am small (5’7″,115 lbs) and although i’m a D cup when I wear a non padded bikini top or a sports bra my boobs appear much much smaller than when I wear a cleavagey shirt or a push up bra. Also it appears marisa has lost some weight. If you look at old candids of her she wasn’t nearly as bony and little as she looks now. And that can defintely make your boobs smaller. I went from a 32DD to a 32D just from a seven pound weight loss. Also I definitely think they photoshop the crap out of her chest in photoshoots, because her boobs look like they hang much more naturally in these beach shots.
Exactly, everyone is built differently and we’re all just estimating her size!.
I LOVE Marisa Miller and think she looks great but I think 110 pounds is false. I weigh 115 pounds, I’m 5’3”,i work out all the time, i wear a B cup, and i don’t look much bigger than she does at all. In fact, once i started eating not enough and working out too much and i got down to 110 pounds, and i didn’t look healthy at all. I think she must weigh between the 115-120 pound scale. She’s too healthy looking too be that slight. And those boobs? And her butt? No way she’s 110. Those go away when you get down that far. At least for me and I’m only 5’3”. If you see the videos on her official website i think her boobs do look like D cups. I don’t think they would airbrush all those videos, like the one of her prancing around on the beach. And her boobs look HUGE. Regardless, I think she’s gorgeous.
You can’t always tell from pictures. It’s really negligible, she could be anywhere from 110lb to 120lb I’d say. Frame size and lean mass has far greater impact on overall weight than boobs and hips. Plus I think she might have implants which explains why she is so thin with boobs that are probably a 28F (same cup volume as 34D but on smaller band).
There are quite a few topless pictures of out there. From those I think she is most likely natural. There are slim women who can have naturally large breasts.
I thought the same thing Leanna, about the implants I mean. Then I saw the topless photos, which are found quite easily on the internet. I think she’s natural. What’s so interesting is the people who grew up with her, including my husband, don’t remember her boobs being that big. He thinks she’s just using push ups and airbrushing, which is what I thought when I saw her in person.
Oh and I read an article where she was quoted as having D’s. So…the 30D bra size could be quite accurate.
And about the height not being 5ft8, I noticed something recently. People with big heads and long torsos in relation to their leg length appear shorter than they are and people with small heads and short torsos look taller.
Case in point, I was standing next to my aunt who I’d always assumed to be around 4ft10 and was shocked to see in the mirror that we were the actually the same height (I’m 5ft2). I realised she has a much bigger head and longer torso in relation to her leg length than me and put it down to that being the reason.
So sometimes body proportions can give the illusion that one is taller or shorter.
I wear a 28E and I’d say she looks about the same as me. That would be equal to a 34C.
She did do all those topless photos for Perfect 10 Magazine where they supposedly “check” to make sure they are real, i don’t really know what that entails but thats what their magazine are all about, and her boobs seem to be about the same size then, even though it was a few years back. Maybe a little smaller. It’s hard to tell.
Marissa Miller is not 5’8. 5’6 -5’7 at best. the vast maj of model heights are exaggerated.
Ok, i don’t get american bra sizing, and all these conversations made me even more confused. So sorry for the offtopic, but hel me out. So, in europe, my bust size is 86, and i wear a 75C bra. However, i know 86 is about 34″. But in the same time, buying bra’s over here, they say 75C eu/ 34C us. According to what you say, the band size is 75 cm, which is clearly less than 34, however 34 is actually the bust size. Help?
Kae- I agree with 5’6. She doesn’t look any taller then that to me. Especially when you compare her to the rest of the victoria’s secret models. For example, Heidi Klum is said to be 5’8 by people who have met her and marisa always appears shorter then her!
I was just wondering Kae, what you’d guess her weight to be at? Some people that have met her say around 100 pounds!??
Stop saying she can’t be 110 lbs, i mean it shocked me too when i saw that number but reality is most of the models, Vs or not are underweight they just have to be really skinny and i think that’s why the majority of them are runaway models (they don’t have curves) and the rest of them, the lucky ones with boobs and curves can do lingerie like the Vs angels. I personally think marisa is perfect, she’s very petite but toned with the right curves and she looks perfectly healtly, i’d kill to have her body.
Everyone is commenting on her height and weight being inaccurate. Does anyone notice the most obvious thing of all though? There is no way Marisa Miller’s waist(23) or hips(35) are accuratley listed. Her torso is very straight, there is no curve whatsoever to her waist! She is a ruler and her measurements add up to an hourglass figure. There is no way this woman is an hourglass figure! There is not enough difference between her waist and hips for her to be an hourglass. Her measurements are fabricated. I can believe she has a 23inc. waist because she is so skinny, but then there is no way her hips are as large as 35in. This is obvious! This woman has boobs on a stick type of body. Not an hourglass figure as her measurements imply. She is straight like a ruler or stick and she has boobs. Woopty do.
i think you need to look at the pictures again…especially the second one…she is in no way a ruler…there is a clear difference in the width of her waist and her hips.. plus you have to take into account that when you measure your hips part of your butt is included, and she does have a butt so she could very well be 23-35
Yes, Marisa Miller is a gorgeous freak of nature. Get. Over. It. Most runway models are underweight. I figured she was actually taller than 5’8″ as that is short for runway! And those of you who are abusing yourselves for not being built like her – stop it. It is not worth getting an eating disorder. Believe me. I know.