Gemma Atkinson on Her (Enlarged) Bust, Body Type and Weight Loss
British glamour model Gemma Atkinson had a long talk with Nuts magazine. About what, you ask? About body image, body shapes and breast surgery – here are the body-related parts of the interview!
Gemma on her gigantic boobs:
I’m an E cup now, which is pretty big, but not too big for my frame. I’m tall with a strong body, so I don’t look too top heavy. I have to say that having my boobs done hasn’t given me a taste for surgery. I’d never have it done to my face and liposuction is lazy – I’d rather work weight off at the gym. My clothes have changed a lot since I got new breasts two years ago, and I’ve done a calendar with my new assets. People keep saying they’re massive but they’re the same size as they were before - I’ve just lost loads of weight and had my boobs put back to the same size. I read somewhere that they were double-F, but if they were, I wouldn’t be able to walk! I was really surprised at how much coverage they got the enlargement. It felt like the nation was obsessed with them!
Gemma on her sexy curves:
I’d hate to be too skinny. Skinny girls just look ill to me. When I was younger, all the girls wanted to be like Kate Moss, but I wanted to look like Jet from Gladiators or Xena: Warrior Princess! I come from a surdy northern stock. I’m like my mum and my sister – we’re all broad-shouldered with strong legs and curves. I’ve never been fat but when I got asked to do my first men’s mag, I was aware I was carrying too much weight. I had a pot belly and big hamster cheeks! The Hollyoaks producers were brilliant and never put me under pressure to lose weight, but I knew that if I was going to start to do bikini and lingerie shoots, I’d need to improve my figure.”
More lingerie pictures featuring Gemma after the jump!
so gorgeouss! i love this girl, shes so beautiful and not at all fake looking. unlike others that are just wayy OTT.
Not very pretty…just have big boobs to get into magazines.
There’s like a little photoshopping flaw on the second picture: i mean they obviously used the clichéd ‘white light’ effect to slim her up on the left side, but look at how far to the left her bra goes! they took off like half an inch.. (im not sure it’s an error or if it was meant to be, but anyway it looks weird to me)
and her boobs look ridiculous in the third picture.
She’s got a gorgeous face, though.
you are totally right, Elizabeth, great sense of observation! it looks so weird now that you mentioned it – how come the mag. didn’t notice??
Its so funny because she is soooo boring and unatractive when she is off camera and in her normal clothes, and then she becomes gorgeous with photoshop infront of the camera.
I think she’s pretty hot myself!
God, her boobs look awful, they just look huge on her frame! And it irritates me that women like this (who are gorgeous and genuine) feel that they need to do this, and then, as a result, give men this horrible idealised view of what is sexy – being skinny with huge boobs isn’t sexy, it just looks weird! And I’m not saying this because I have no boobs, that is categorically not the case. But as well as having my own E-cup boobs to boast about, they might come with a tiny waist but they also come with big hips and a big bum. Gemma is gorgeouse, but she doesn’t look natural enough. And Elizabeth, good spot of the photoshopping flaw, I’ve just noticed it too – as if her boobs didn’t look odd enough already! If she was curvier everywhere else I’d probably be massively jealous of her, but she just doesn’t look right…
all her talking about her “heavy frame” plus sporting these huge breasts on her tiny body seems like justifying for that she is not emaciatedly thin, but “just” skinny. i do have a “normal” frame and still look probably double her weight although i am healthy!
She’s pretty, but she’s also an idiot: there are plenty of women far more hourglassy herself who have (real!) breasts bigger than hers, and they can walk just fine. Idiot.