Kelly Brook, Front and Back
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
We already know that Kelly Brook is a true hourglass. This is why, when looking at pictures with her, there are two main attraction areas. Not this time - this time, the focus is on Kelly’s legs.
First of all and not at all weight-related, she must make up her mind: leather jacket with fur collar and naked legs - is she cold or is she hot? Regardless, her legs look, besides naked, slim and lean, not particularly toned (no, I am not saying being so is a must), pretty cellulite-free, except for some suspect minor shadows that might indicate the contrary.
How do you all like Kelly’s legs and overall body?
5 views
Related Posts
- Slim and Curvy Kelly Brook
- Kelly Brook in a Bikini - Front, Back and Side
- Helen Hunt in a Bikini, Front and Back
- Cameron Diaz Shows Us Muscles
- Helena Christensen in a Bikini
- Tara Reid Shows Some Leg Skin
- Kelly Brook Defines the Hourglass
- Katherine Heigl Out, Around and About
- Skinny Versus Curvy Battle Time! Jaslene Gonzalez Versus Kelly Brook!
- Salma Hayek, That Is Not the Outfit for You
May 14th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
That IS cellulite on the back of her thighs. And it is not attratcive at all. If you have it, cover it. It is that simple. Unless you want to be the next Mischa Barton, that is.
May 14th, 2008 at 10:29 pm
I think her body looks ok, but nothing special. give me scarlett any day
June 5th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
I think she is seriously hot.