Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Kelly Osbourne

Kelly Osbourne Lost 10 More Pounds

FP_5668299_ViperRoom_Celebs_PER_0901101 - Kelly Osbourne Lost 10 More Pounds

Last week, Kelly Osbourne stepped into sexy lingerie and performed in a burlesque show with The Pussycat Dolls – check out the pictures! If Kelly looks even slimmer to you, that’s because she lost an additional 10 pounds:

‘Losing another 10lbs since splitting with my ex Luke and becoming a size 6 has given me the confidence to dress up! I cannot believe all the positive comments I got.’

… says Kelly.

However, her mom seems to be worried, according to the Daily Mail:

‘Sharon is desperately worried,’ a source reportedly told New! magazine.

‘Kelly is naturally a bigger girl but she’s taken the whole skinny thing too far.’

The unnamed source adds that her split from Luke may be the root of the problem.

It’s no coincidence that she looks gaunt and skinny since she split from Luke – she makes out like it’s all fine but that couldn’t be further from the truth.’

P.S.: In February 2010, (after losing 42 pounds) Kelly was the proud owner of a 118 pounds figure at 5’3”– or 160 cm and 54 kg. If she lost 10 more pounds, she must be around 108 (BMI 19) – does that seem accurate to you?

FP_5667942_ViperRoom_Celebs_PER_090110 - Kelly Osbourne Lost 10 More Pounds

FP_5667542_ViperRoom_Celebs_PER_090110 - Kelly Osbourne Lost 10 More Pounds

Incoming search terms:

how long did it take kelly osbourne to lose weight, skinnyvscurvy, Kelly osbourne fakes, kelly osbourne skinny
Previous ArticleNext Article
Editor of Skinny vs Curvy Website

122
Leave a Reply

avatar
75 Comment threads
47 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
87 Comment authors
kayLeeLooTest Force Xtreme MuscleJordySarah Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Erica
Guest
Erica

She doesn’t look too thin to me – I would say that 108 pounds is a little low. Maybe her original weight was more than reported or she hasn’t lost another 10 pounds.
I think she looks pretty good – but she shouldn’t lose any more weight, that would be going too far.

Ally
Guest
Ally

Agreed!

molly
Guest
molly

I second that.

maddie
Guest
maddie

her legs might be thick…but her torso/everything else is TINY….have you seen her emmy pictures?

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

Agree with Maddie, these guys obviously haven’t seen how small she looks in other pictures.

Mizzy
Guest
Mizzy

it is also entirely possible that she isn’t actually 5’3, but is only 5’1 or something. A lot of celebs (and non celebs, actually) lie about their height. I could totally believe that she is 5’1 108 pounds.

chinadoll08
Guest
chinadoll08

yeah 5’2 look at the website….celeb heights

Eve
Guest
Eve

Hmm, it does not sound right to me at all. She is very muscular girl and at 108 she would have looked just horrible and ultra thin not like this at all. Kinda Kim K story

Candy
Guest
Candy

She looks alright to me in those pics.

paigeee
Guest
paigeee

she looks alot more then 108 more like 125+..and everyone keeps talking about this kim k story what is that all about?

CoffeeGirl
Guest
CoffeeGirl

I agree. She is pretty musclular, so it’s unlikely that her weight is that low.

Kim’s story – she claimed that she was 109, most people did not believe
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/kim-kardashian/kim-kardashian-109-pounds.html

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

125lb? I highly doubt it, you should see some of the others pics of her taken recently. She looks tiny!

chechebelle
Guest
chechebelle

I wouldn’t doubt 125 at all actually. I’m the same age as Kelly, and, like Kelly, I recently took up a new form of physical exercise. (For her it’s dancing, for me, roller derby). When you work out a lot, you put on a lot of muscle. At 5’4”, I’m 125 and a size 4, She’s shorter than I am and claims to be a 6. So 125 is a good estimate.

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

She means a UK size 6, not US.

marge
Guest
marge

there’s NO WAY she is a UK 6

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

Well it’s not clear from these pics but if you see the photos of her in the short silver dress or at the emmy’s it’s obvious how narrow she really is, esp. her hips they are tiny.

jay
Guest
jay

im 5’2 and 110 . i am WAY thinner than her. (not from muscles)
all lies. ill tell u that.
i say 120 +.

Minnie
Guest
Minnie

I couldn’t agree more.
When my BMI was 19, I looked so much smaller than her.
I was around Alessandra Ambrosio’s size (except shorter, of course).
Her limbs aren’t slender enough for her to have a BMI of 19. Her legs are muscular, so they must be quite heavy.
Even if she does look like she weighs more than she does, she still is almost definitely not 108.

artemis
Guest
artemis

i really like her hair

Pie
Guest
Pie

You can tell just by looking at her that this is not her natural weight. Her head looks huge and her legs still look chunky compared to the rest of her body. I’m not saying she looks bad, I’m just saying that it must take a lot of effort on her part to push her body to this weight, and if she starts to get even a little lazy, her weight will eventually edge back to where it was. It’s only natural – Our bodies are comfortable at a certain weight, and unless she keeps up her eating habits/exercise habits… Read more »

amazon
Guest
amazon

thats proportions. my cousin is 5’7, and has the tiniest head, not matter what her weight. she makes everyone else look pumpkin headed. kelly has big hair here and along with her narrow shoulders that makes her head look larger.

amazon
Guest
amazon

sorry i had to comment again. you say if she changes her eating/exercise habits again her body will change- em yeah thats how she lost it in the first place. and how she put it on in the first place. your body isn’t comfortable at a certain weight- YOU are comfortable at a certain weight, eating a certain diet and doing a certain amoount of exercise. the interesting thing i found as a former binge eater, is that you can be equally comfortable eating a lot less, something most people don’t believe. the point as i try to tell friends… Read more »

princessdi
Guest
princessdi

Actually, doctors have proven that people DO have a set point that their dna/genetics has given them. Its usually why when someone gets slim and wants to loose even more weight to look skinny it takes major extremes to achieve their goal. they usually gain it back unless they cont. to starve or workout in excess. Look at J. Simpson, her set point is clearly not what she was in Daisy D. days. Look it up, its a true fact.

Annie
Guest
Annie

Wrong. Doctors haven’t proven anything. It’s a theory, which is why it’s called the “set point theory”.

Casey
Guest
Casey

No, it means doctors HAVE proven it. That’s why it’s a theory and not a hypothesis.

But like many things, doctors can’t dimiss disproving it, so it has to stay a theory and not a natural law.

Like the evolutionary theory. There’s thousands of studies that support it, varying from fossils, to plant mutation, to DNA and protein synthesis. But because we can’t fail to disprove it, definition-wise it will always stay a theory.

Basically, a theory in scientific terms does stand for A LOT. It’s not the same as the term theory in everyday talk.

edith the elf
Guest
edith the elf

Gravity is a “theory” too, but would you dispute that?

Kimberly
Guest
Kimberly

Hmmm….well, when I majored in public health in college, we were taught that weight is in fact determined by genetics. Whether the individual decides to take steps to lose weight or gain it is up to them.

Fader
Guest
Fader

Isn’t there also something that says you can lower your set point by maintaining a lower weight for over 6 months.

ella
Guest
ella

@Fader: That’s really, interesting, I wonder if it’s true??

Kimberly
Guest
Kimberly

Not that I’m aware of.

amazon
Guest
amazon

em i don’t know what studies you have been reading but everything i have heard and read about studies into set points have concluded that factors other than metabolic rates are responsible for regainging weight, and primarily that was an inability to maintain a lower calorie intake long term. ie lifestyle!
and moreover you cannot LOOK at someone and decide what weight they should be.

Casey
Guest
Casey

And what I’ve found observing others and hearing others talk about their diet is that there is variation in how flexible people’s weights are. Some people can easily gain or lose weight depending on their eating habits and exercise. But on the other hand, some people can drastically change their diet, and their weight stays immovable. Also, there’s plenty of genetics involved that make it clear people have specific frames and weights that are optimal. Muscle development and bone development for an example. If you carry too much fat, it will show, because it will burden your muscles and bones.… Read more »

Mia
Guest
Mia

a theory has not been proven. a theory is a set coherent propositions that can generate hypotheses to be tested. only scientific laws have been “proven”.

Casey
Guest
Casey

For a theory to become a theory, it has to have been a hypothesis, whose null hypothesis has been rejected with some form of evidence. So in layman terms, a theory is a proven hypothesis. It just hasn’t been proven to be true in all cases ever, which is why it is not a law. Most theories (evolutionary theory, someone mentioned gravity) are, practically, natural laws. But you cannot call them a law because you can’t prove that they’re not wrong and that they won’t be wrong in some case in the future. But my point was simpler than that.… Read more »

amazon
Guest
amazon

having a weight that is optimal is not the same as being ‘meant’ to be a certain weight. the two words have entirely different meanings. And again overall this ‘optimal’ weight where you are healthy fit and happy, and can maintain easily, is still primarily i would argue determined by your mental attitude towards your diet and lifestyle and image. get all those in line whether you are a size 0 or a size 12 and you are a pretty lucky individual.

Casey
Guest
Casey

I agree. Optimal is not the same as meant to be, but I think when people say “meant to be” they mean optimal. And like I said, people vary in terms of how much their weight is influenced by outside factors just like they vary in height or hair color. Some people’s weight easily responds to diet and exercise changes, and some people’s weight doesn’t. Diet and lifestyle are certainly contributing factors. If you eat 5000 calories, no matter who you are, you’ll gain weight. And if you eat 0 calories, no matter who you are, you’ll lose weight. But… Read more »

Jasmin
Guest
Jasmin

Lollypop head…

Mia
Guest
Mia

if she does weigh 108 pounds then she really doesn’t carry her weight well. It is possible that she gained some weight back after dancing with the stars, and then lost 10 pounds…

Mia
Guest
Mia

Also, I assume she is talking about US sizes, and I find it hard to believe that someone who is 5’3 108 pounds would wear a US size 6…I would expect a person that size to wear a size 2 or even 0 (and I’m 5’3, so I should have some idea..)

clare
Guest
clare

she means a uk 6, which is the smallest size
well there is a 4 but that only came about after the whole size zero thing
and its mostly for young girls
or very petite women

Ellie
Member

There is absolutely NO WAY she is a UK size 6. I live in the UK and I have a small rib cage and a very flat stomach and my size 6 tops are very tight, I’m usually an 8. Size 6 is very thin, and although Kelly obviously looks slim, she is definitely not a 6.

Gigi
Guest
Gigi

guant? she looks beautiful. she doesnt need to lose anymore though.

Natalie Sundling
Guest

She looks great! Though she shouldn’t lose more. My myself am a curvy girl and I don’t look good as skinny person.

Papy86
Guest
Papy86

Is not possibile: i’m 5’3 and i weight 108 lb and… i’m a size 2 but i also can dress some 0, so is not possibile! i was size 6 at 120 lb!

maddie
Guest
maddie

you can’t see how narrow her hips and torso are in this picture because of the jacket she’s wearing….it shows on other sites when she has it off her weight’s in her legs and no where else

Jemima
Guest
Jemima

I’m 5’3″ at 125 pounds and I wear a size 0-2, never bigger, so not everyone weights at least 120 lbs to wear a size six. I’m not saying she is 108 lbs because she looks a little bigger than that to me, but yeah. I don’t think weight always determines size of clothing.

Papy86
Guest
Papy86

se look 120 lb, not less!

Ana
Member

Hrm i dunno, A UK 6 which is AU6? , she looks like a size UK8 in these pics but i just seen these other pics of her and she has quite thick muscular legs but her waist and torso is tiny! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1308830/Kelly-Osbourne-shows-toned-legs-slim-figure-day-performing-Pussycat-Dolls.html?ito=feeds-newsxml so i believe she is a 6

Maria
Guest
Maria

I think she looks amazing! So confident and really glowing. And the Daily Mail “source” is just BS!

amazon
Guest
amazon

i don’t want to comemnt on weight cause most celebs official weights baffle me, but i am 5’1, weighed myself the other day at 102 pounds, 105 is where i normally sit, but i feel like i look a little slimmer, at least in my limbs, and certainly less muscular than kelly. I’m definetly not unhealthy, and she certainly doesn’t look it

emma
Guest
emma

There is no chance on earth Kelly is a size 6.She looks about a size 10.Especially on the bottom half!

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

Have you seen how smaller her hips are in other pictures? I’m a UK size 10 on my bottom half and her hips are much narrower than mine.

Papy86
Guest
Papy86

She is not 108 lb at all!

Julchen
Guest
Julchen

wow, she looks so happy and confident… never found her pretty at all, but now… she’s really looking good!!

but she should not lose more weight!

size0??
Guest
size0??

She looks great but not 108. 115-120.

maddie
Guest
maddie

people under that jacket you dont realise that there is NO meat….she has no hips and no meat on her torso…..she isnt that tall either….i think it is believable, maybe she was dehydrated when she weighed herself or it was like 49.9kgs and she just said ok so im 49kgs….

Maggie
Guest
Maggie

Maybe my attitude is not just, but this girl will never be thin no matter how hard she tries. Her weight is perfectly normal, but her appearance still makes an imppression of a big fat girl. Sorry.Even though she looks happy and confident.

beckers
Guest
beckers

There is another pic of her in a silver sparkly dress and she looks absolutely tiny. Honestly i don’t know what her body shape is but she’s got a tiny midrif.

beckers
Guest
beckers
Papy86
Guest
Papy86

I don’t like her body. And her face too.

progressivelements
Guest
progressivelements

No way she is 108lbs at 5ft3. I’m 107 at 5ft2 and I look waaaaaaay skinnier than her. Can’t even see her clavicles! She’s a slim girl, yes, but I’d say she isn’t under 115.

Cristina
Guest
Cristina

I have friends who have bmis of 22 and their clavicles are popping out and i know skinny girls who have barely visible ones. Who made this the ultimate skinny factor?

Erin
Guest
Erin

Word ^^^

clavicles don’t mean sh*t

Jemima
Guest
Jemima

Agreed, my clavicles don’t pop out at all but I’m deffo not fat. I carry weight like most pear shapes, but my clavicles seem to be in hiding.

erica amorim
Member

It’s so terrible to say this, but she still doesn’t look good. She really has lost some weight, but I don’t like her at all, nor face and body.

beckers
Guest
beckers

Also there really is no pleasing some people, she looks better, she’s worked hard. Lets leave it at that.

FoofyDoofy
Guest

If she is 5’3″ and 108lbs I think she would be much smaller than a size 6. I’m basing this off my height and weight. I’m 5’2″ and weigh 120lbs. I wear sizes 2 and 4.

That being said, I think she looks great! And I want that jacket in my closet.

Kari
Guest
Kari

She is definitely either smaller than a size 6 or not 108 lbs!!! She looks good but I’d almost say that she looks around 118 in these pics which is perfect for her height. I’m an athletic 5’3″ at 125 lbs and I wear a size 2!

Trace
Guest
Trace

I’m pretty sure she’s talking about the UK size 6, which is a US size 0-2.

maddie
Guest
maddie

she is a UK 6….which is a US 2

Sidney
Guest
Sidney

Idk, hard to tell, i think speculating someone’s weight is kinda pointless. (but if i do add my own opinion here, i might say 108 lbs on a 5’3 figure isn’t always a size 0-2, at that weight i’m a us 4, even a 6 at times, yupp. For size 2, i have to get almost down to 100 lbs, so, what has been said before, we all have different builts) What i can see is that she’s a lot smaller than she used to be, but doesn’t look sickly skinny to me. However, it is different to always be… Read more »

Sidney
Guest
Sidney

oh and someone said she was talking about uk sizes, which would make sense for her, and gotta say, i could believe that too, though she doesn’t really look THAT small to me in that pic, but maybe she is.

Polly
Guest
Polly

Now she’s Kim Kardashian’s size! What’s with everyone claiming to weigh 108 pounds?! Needless to say, I don’t think that this is Kelly’s long term weight.

Jebes
Guest

No I think she is a 108lbs. Shes just about right anymore and shes underweight. You can be skinny and shapely.

snoops
Guest
snoops

The daily mail is a trashy newspaper that prints lie after lie. I do not believe that “source” I think they just made it up.

Kelly looks fine she doesnt look “gaunt” in the slighest. She has worked hard and it has paid off. Good for her.

Cristina
Guest
Cristina

I’m quite positive she is talking about uk size 6. I am a bit reluctant to believe that, though. She is small and she looks great, but not that small.

Leah
Guest
Leah

A UK 6 is about a 2 here in the US, right? You can tell by the bone structure in her face that she’s not naturally that small. Her skin looks like it’s being pulled across her jawline. I read somewhere (a book, not the Internet) that the way you can tell if someone is naturally thin, as opposed to going to extreme measures is to look at their heads. If their heads look huge on their bodies, chances are they are under their natural weight. If their heads look in proportion to their bone structure, they’re most likely naturally… Read more »

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

In other pics of her you can see that her waist and hips are absolutely tiny hence why she can be a size 6 (UK sizes)…she might be an 8 on her upper body.

It’s just her shoulders are broad and her arms/legs look big in relation to the rest of her body and this kind of skews things.

Pistola
Guest
Pistola

People should remember that she is only 5’2″… I believe she could be 110 lbs and (an American) size 4. Her calves are thick and muscular, but her waist and hips are narrow- which is determinant of your dress size. Her calves could be twice as large as they are now, and she’s be the same dress size.

Dana
Guest

I think she looks great. It is obvious that she is built to be naturally thicker but I don’t think she looks unhealthy. I am just not seeing this is an anorexic version of a thicker girl?

Leah
Guest
Leah

I agree. She still looks soft, I don’t see any bones poking out anywhere.

Cristina
Guest
Cristina

She is muscular. Not soft. She is quite the opposite of soft. Look, i am not defending her, but hearing things as she is not skinny because you can’t see her clavicles and she is not skinny because you can’t see bones, wth? You can count all my ribs and vertebrae (almost all, someone actually counted), but you know, when i am fully clothed, bones don’t “pop out”. Clothes have a purpose you know.

Papy86
Guest
Papy86

She is def not 108lb!! And i don’t really lice her!

super_kittycat
Guest
super_kittycat

i think she looks good. she has great legs. i dont know about weighing only 108 but who knows. everybody is different. im 5 5 127 and wear a size 2. when im down to 115 im a 0. people are just different

anabel
Guest
anabel

All I can say is that she looks sad.

Lisa
Guest
Lisa

Are we looking at the same pictures?

JEN
Guest
JEN

She is thin but not to skinny, not sickly…..

I do believe she will eventually go up again….

Princess
Guest
Princess

I don`t want to sound rude,but for me this girl in every size she is she`s always looks ugly…sorry

Blair
Guest
Blair

mmm.. don’t think she’s to thin… But on this girl a few pounds more just look better. She’s more a girl for a more curvy look. This thin look just looks a bit weird on Kelly, it doesnt suite her.

C
Guest
C

Kelly looks hands-down amazing. I’m glad Kelly has reinvented her style again and lost all the excess body fat. She looks healthy not sickly.

siennagold
Guest
siennagold

I’m glad she slimmed down but those photos don’t look like she’s at 108 lbs – maybe more like 120 lbs?

lc
Guest
lc

Well, 108….doesn’t sound accurate to me. It’s slightly more believable than Kim K. being 109, that was just plain ridiculously unbelievable. But it still seems too low…

Nay!
Guest
Nay!

She’s not 108 i am a cm shorter than her and a few months ago I was 108 and I was tiiiiny everywhere so I really, really don’t believe it maybe she is a few pounds heavier but not 108 and I don’t get it what’s the point of lying about it? She still looks pretty to me and no too thin and not on the edge of becoming underweight (as her supposed bmi of 19 shows)

Raachel
Guest
Raachel

She’s not too thin.. I’m 170 cm and i weigh around 55, doctor told me the weight I should be in between is 52 kg – 72 kg. She’s only 160 cm so she is by far not underweight. However she did lose weight obviously and she looks great!

alana
Guest
alana

i bet it’s accurate, she is tiny but has very muscular legs so she looks like she weighs more than she does i bet. on the other hand a bmi of 19 is not underweight so i don’t know what everyone is worried about a size 6 is healthy.

james
Member

I don’t think she looks gaunt but that maybe because she one of those people with fatter faces

Jemima
Guest
Jemima

108 sounds a little low. I hope she doesn’t weigh that little, she’s starting to look unhealthy in the face :\