Body Comparisons, Kim Cattrall, Madonna

Kim Cattrall Versus Madonna – Whose Body Would You Rather Have?

kim-cattrall-versus-madonna-whose-body-would-you-rather-have

Here are the facts: Kim is 51 and Madonna is 49, so they are pretty close in age – but not in body type! In fact, there two ladies prove that you can look amazing even when you pass 45 – and even though they both look great, I think you’ll agree that they look very different.

While Kim’s got curves and a more feminine figure, Madonna is very athletic and muscular. So, which body do you prefer? Would you rather have Kim’s well proportioned and softer figure or Madonna’s hard-as-a-rock body? Kim Cattrall versus Madonna! Choose your side!

Photo source & credit: Celebutopia, INF

Incoming search terms:

kim cattrall measurements, madonna measurements
Previous ArticleNext Article
  • I would rather have Kim’s body. Madonna has rockin’ arms but just a little manly for me!

  • Lil

    Madonna’s body is just gross. The skins mushy but muscular, yuck. Kim’s body any day.

  • Seatt,e

    Madonna’s body for sure!

  • gem

    kim cattrall! she’s stunning and an inspiration to all women!

  • Elena

    Anything is better than Madonna. Well, I love Kim so I def choose her. She has a large bone structure and still looks amazing!

  • tim

    not that im a woman…. but ill take madonna anyday she is fit and sexy as hell…. not taking away from kim she is hott too, but here in america most american men and women are fat….. madonna is very muscular and healthy… i had the honor of seeing her in person and i must say the woman is 100% perfection…. she is a small framed lady but her body stands out like you would have to stop and give the glory,,,, she is very fit and she works out hard and it shows

  • m.

    THEY BOTH HAVE GREAT BODIES BUT I THINK MADONNA NEEDS TO PACK ON A FEW POUNDS ONLY BECAUSE SHE LOOKS TOO MUSCULAR KIM

Skip to toolbar