Bikini Body Battle! Nicole Scherzinger VS Kim Kardashian!
June 16, 2009 in Bikini Body Battle, Kim Kardashian, Nicole Scherzinger by Versus
Remember when I put Kim and Nicole in a battle together? A bunch of you said that they were a perfect match – well let’s do it again!
But wait, this time it’s even better, we’re doing a Bikini Body Battle!
These 2 are definitely the owners of 2 fabulous beach figures – are you a fan of Nicole’s slim & curvy, yet at the same time very fit package or do you prefer Kim’s more voluptuous figure?
Bikini Body Battle! Nicole Scherzinger VS Kim Kardashian!
Pick your favorite – but only after you see another angle on the second page!
I’m all for the curves, so Kim get’s my vote.
BUT, they both look great.
I think they both look gorgeous. I think Nicole has the perfect body when being slim and I think Kim has the perfect body when being curvy, so they are both perfect in their own way.
But nicole really looks insanely stunning and she has toned beautiful body but not overly toned, and I really like that.
I agree with you! It’s a hard decision!But I would probably want nicole’s body.
michelle didnt only said her opinion but also mine =)
agree… perfect waist/hip ratio
Oh, but I like Nicole’s bathingsuit more.
let’s see they have many things in common : long hair/perfect tan /hot brunettes / curvy bodies well Kim is kinda curvier while Nicole is curvy in the right places GUYS ! it’s way hard to choose but I ‘ll go for NICOLE cus it’s hard to be curvy/fit/slim all at the same time NICE JOB NICKY ! I bet we all envy your beeeeeeep lol
Nicole! Omg, i always admired her body but i never realized it was this stunning. Those legs, that waist, those abs – toned but not overly. Very nice. I am so impressed. My body inspiration was Megan Fox until now, but i think Nicole is getting ahead right now. How tall is she, btw?
i agree…she isnt overly toned and perfect….megan fox still is my inspiration(along with marissa miller)…nicole is probally tall..i’ll say about 5′7 maybe?
BTW, I read that she’s 5′5″ tall.
i was close…..taller than me
5′5″ ? That’s cool, i’m 5′4″ so i am close to both her and Megan. Yay
)
I wouldn’t aspire to look like Marissa Miller. She has fake boobs (it’s obvious to me, because I have natural double ds and a small waist, and so anyone who is fake boobed is transparent to us naturally chesty women…it’s the unnatural, and jagged outlines of the boobs along with the silicone bag shape that can be seen in a lot of pics that gives it away…big natural boobs never have certain outlines). Plus, her skin is bad…it looks old and leathery and she’s quite young! It must be all that sun.
Megan Fox is really pretty and looks like her body is real, although she is really pale and blotchy.
Nopp, Kim’s body is way hot. Shame bout the cellulite. But everyone gets it. Oh well.
Marissa Millers Boobs- Im 16, and a DD, im only size ten. Theyre natural. Same as Marissa.
I agree with the Megan Fox comment, but shes not real. Shes had so much surgery. Its sad that ‘Uma’ is using her as inspiration. Aspire for a healthy, toned body. Not an airbrushed, overly plastic one.
(:
I completely agree. I have been on a Megan Fox body kick lately, but then I saw Nicole…wow! Gorgeous healthy woman!
nicole all the way!almost like mine.
you’re hot then
one more vote for nicole! she has a perfect slim-curvy body!
Nicole! Kim’s butt is just way to huge for the rest of her body.
Nicole all the way…she looks great and has the right curves…Kim is not toned enough
I like Nicole better – she is obviously fit and works hard to keep her body in good shape. I also like the fact that her face is fresh and seems makeup-free, as opposed to Kim, whose makeup is trowelled on even at the beach.
I agree, I think she’s just the right amount of curvy.
Thanks Versus! Nicole has my idea of the perfect body. Fit and curvy in all the right spots. I like Kim’s body too but her rear is a little large for my taste. She still has a nice figure though.
Nicole’s body is inspiring.
Kim all the way, she looks so stunning and i feel that its a ‘real woman’ look. I don’t know why I just love it!
Sorry, but it annoys me when people talk about how “real women” look. I think it is an idiotic comment to make.
Anyway, I think Nicole’s body looks amazing!!!
me too. yes she’s a woman but not every woman will look like kim. a woman is a woman, skinny, curvy or full figured.
It’s hard to chose, I think they are both hot and rockin’ their body types.
Nicole’s body reminds me a lot of Bar’s. I think she looks gorgeous body-wise, even if I’m not a fan of her face. Agreed, inspirational body!
I’m glad Nicole gained a bit of weight; she had gotten really thin a couple of months ago.
I think they both look fantastic but I think Kim’s curves are sexier. To me, she has the *best* body…and I bet most men would agree!
Nicole by far has the better body, I love how she looks slim, toned, and curvy all at the same time. She also looks a lot more natural than Kim who’s wearing a lot of makeup!
Nicole definately. Slim, toned with just the right amount of curves imo.
No question, no doubt, no COMPARISON.
NICOLE OBVIOUSLY!
Exactly!
How can you possibly compare a fit, toned performer with a useless, fat tart?! There’s NOTHING to compare!
Kim K.’s not fat.
To me, she is.
Then I suggest you learn what fat really is/means. Kim K. isn’t fat in any way at all, the only thing big on her is her ass, and a big ass does not make a person fat over all, it just means they have a big ass. Her stomach, legs, torso, and arms are all fairly slender, just don’t see how anyone can honestly call her fat and mean it.
she has a flat stomach, toned body and the only thing big about her is her ass….so no she’s not fat. Kirsty Alley, Beth Ditto(even though I love her) they are considered fat…but Kim K…Not even close.
Well, you don’t agree with me, but that’s not going to make me change my mind.
Mushy stomach + big ass = fat / disproportionate figure.
Mind I didn’t say she’s OBESE (because that’s not the case), but she’s deinitely a bit TOO SOFT for my taste.
On the other hand, Nicole Scherzinger is perfect.
My parents taught me a very valuable lesson: Guys don’t make passes at girls with fat asses.
Rachael agreed 100%, Nicole has a sexy body!
What I or anyone else thinks is not important. If rachael thinks that K.K. is fat, that’s her opinion. It’s all about opinions. Let’s say I think Nicole Richie is fat. It’s up to me to decide what I think or not. Who is tall, who is fat, who has long hair? It’s opinions. And I agree with rachael when it comes to K.K. She is SOFT, there are no muscles on her body. Nicole, on the other hand is strong as hell.
And opinions can be wrong. Case in point
there’s not a lot of difference – kim has a little more fat.
if nicole is fit and toned, then by that same standard kim has to be reasonably slim at least…in those photos there is almost no difference, except kim has a lower waist-hip ratio and nicole a little more stomach muscle.
i think both look good; i prefer nicole’s body, but only by a bit, because there’s only a bit of difference.
I hate to burst ur bubbles ppl, but kim kardashian is SKINNY. i know 12yr olds with more body than this girl. She is NOT vuluptuous. And her butt isnt big AT ALL. Sure, its a nice bubble butt, but nothig serious. Beyonce is slim. j.lo is slim. U want 2see curvy? Google Buffy the Body r Koi the urban model. Now those are naturally vuluptuous women who actually have booties. im tired of hearing ppl call kim k fat, saying that she has a huge butt, etc. in reality she is thin. nothing special. there are plenty of latinas and black women wih ACTUALLY curvy figures. Versus, why not show us some urban models? like buffy the body? or vida guerra? it is not fair that we only see this woman over and over. i am 17 and am curvier than her. Seriously
we mean curvy… not fat
You consider Vida Guerra curvy but call Kim K. skinny? Sorry hun, but they have very similar body types, and I’d say that Kim’s more curvy since her waist is smaller, her hips are a bit wider and her butt is bigger than Vida’s.
btw Pia, I really wouldn’t call Buffie the body or Miss Koi fat, it’s just their bottom halves that are big, their top halves are fairly normal/healthy looking, they’ve got fairly flat stomachs too.
I’m also scratching my head with the comment about Vida Guerra being curvy, but Kim being skinny. They are both around 5′2″ish, Vida’s measurements are 34C-25-37 and Kim’s are 35D-26-40 (according to the first sites to pop up on google). So, not only are their measurements close to each other, but Kim is actually curvier than Vida!
yea, u know and ur rite ladies (and gentlemen?), with the exception of pia. kim is ot skinny. wat i meant that at 5′3 and 117lbs she most ikely isnt as curvy as she luks on camera. im sure she would be considered pretty petite and slim in real life )nothing wrong with that at all). and vida guerra is a bit smaller than her, come to thnk of it. But Koi and Buffy are NOT fat as few have mentioned. and they have huge butts IMO, and not kim k. sorry.
*not skinny haha typo, sorry
Kim is lying about her weight… Really, she is no way no how, not in this worl, 117 lbs.
First of all, it’s a lie that camera adds, because technology has gone so far, that it slims down women, except from some paparazzi cameras(which are not like the ones that took kim’s pic here,but those ones where the pic doesn’t look 100% clear!). Those pictures of kim must be photoshopped, because look at her cellulite a month ago at that unphotoshopped-by-mistake picture! and I agree with Uma, kim is lying about her weight, unless she has zero muschle tone.(it doesn’t mean she doesn’t have a nice body)
I don’t think she’s a size 2 either but you cannot tell a persons weight or measurements just by looking at them. People think that because someone is very pearshaped that they weigh even more or because someones got broad shoulders they weigh even more, and it’s impossible to guess peoples weight, measurements or height just by looking at them.
I don’t see why KK can’t be 117lb because:
1. She’s fairly short
2. She’s small framed (except for having a wide pelvis)
3. She’s not got much muscle
4. It’s only really her lower half that looks bigger and therefore gives the illusion that she’s heavier.
5. The camera makes people appear bigger.
Wow! Kim has almost my exact measurments the anly thing for the height(I’m 5′5) and the waist (I’m 28) So how does she get into a 2 when I’m a 5 & 7?
Crystal- she doesn’t lol!! She makes up things like weighing 117lbs. Why I dunno I think there’s nothing wrong with telling your true stats and weight…
Hi Jay,
We’ve had some posts about Vida – you can check them out here:
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/search/guerra
… but I have to disagree with you, Kim looks curvier than Vida to me.
As for the urban models, I’ll try to find pictures and maybe will have a post in the future.
Eww please don’t- I’ve looked them up and apart from being trashy as hell they are rank!!
that’s mean. it would be good to see a variation of women as im sure a variation of women all colours and shapes visit this site so that should be reflected
hey no-one said anything about colours- but those two girls are nasty..
However I think Vida and Kim have lovely shapes if a bit bigger than my preference (plus Kim has a beautiful face).
oh hush. we should have different models than see the same people over and over.
thank you versus. i love the fact that you actually read and try your best to fullfill requests. and J, just because you find them trashy and “rank” doesn’t mean that other people do. Many people find Bffy and miss koi to be very attractive. difference in cultures. that is why they get work, my dear
Hey sorry but I googled their pics and huge asses oiled up and stuck in my face is not attractive. Bit like the Lucy Pinders of the world in FHM.
It isn’t women of that size that I have an issue with- I loved Sophie Dahl during her bigger days…
Beauty is cultural but ’skankyness’ is universal and the images that appeared for these ladys were rough- even with safe search on. Though have to conceed I read an interview from Koi and she seemed quite an interesting person..
I agree with you about the pics, J. I was just trying to shed some light that there are girls with bigger butts out there who aren’t as well known. i told my boyfriend that kim k had the biggest butt in hollywood and he almost died laughing saying that she had a “little bubble”. According to his (the african american)culture she has a little bubble. when he showed me Buffy i was like WHOOOA!! see, in the Black/Hispanic community urban models with rediculously HUGE butts and slim waists are in high demand right now. I just thought it would be interesting for versus to show some pics from another perspective. on another note, both ladies up there have very beautiful and healthy looking bodies
Jay- I understand now- and I agree that other shapes are fabulous- my eyes were really opened up in Jamacia to 100% solid women who were quite big but I found thier shapes so different and beautiful and it helped me embrace my own shape (which is quite conventional).
i think kim’s butt is big, compared to the women in hollywood. her butt is nowhere as big as buffie or ki toy, but it’s not flat. she is voluptuous because she may not be thick, but she has that tiny waist, wide hips and big butt that most guys in the black/latino community like.
KIM from the front definately, but Nicole from the back she looks more toned!
but her butt is so flat…Well, I guess some people are into that.
Really??? You think Nicole’s butt is flat? I think it’s very nicely shaped. She fills out a pair of jeans quite nicely IMO.
i say they’re both beautiful with great fit bodies. i prefer both bodies because kim has a curvy figure and nicole can be skinny but have a nice slim yet curvy figure.
Niicole looks better in the bikini!
But they’re both gorgeous.
I prefer Nicole’s body, but they both look great. It’s a bit embarrassing to admit this, but I used to not be able to tell them apart.
Nicole for sure!
she has a better skin, and i think that kim’s legs are kind of skinny for her body so it looks wierd, but nicole’s body is more proportioned and it looks better
Nicole without a doubt.
KIM!!!
i think nicole has a gorgeous body but i like kims curves
I love them both, they are gorgeous!!! in their own way. but I love Kim!
The Kardashian-anator wins everytime, she just looks so natural in a bikini. Also, I am slightly biased as I’m a huge Kim fan.
i just love nicole!!!!!!!!!she looks perfect!!!!!!luv her luv her luv her…and i think she` s a nice person too
I love Nicole`s body!she`s so fit and still curvy. Seeing that picture of her makes me wanna go exercise
I thought Nicole had became veeeeery skinny. But after I saw this photo, I realized she has a great healthy body.
I think kim is very beautiful woman, but I prefer nicole’s body.
I remember voting Kim last time (?), but here my vote goes to Nicole. There are couple of reasons: these aren´t the best bikini pictures I´ve seen of Kim, with other pictures it might have been a tuffer call. I like Kim´s waistline more, but then again I prefer Nicole´s butt. And, though I like light skin also, Nicole looks more tanned, which hides imperfections and gives an illusion of more toned body (not that Nicole´s body isn´t toned!)
Wow, they look so similar! But I’m going to vote for Nicole – I guess her body just looks more ‘neat’. Kim does look gorgeous though
I think Nicole has such a gorgeous body but im a little disappointed in her,she’s had a boob job! i remember when she first started out in PCD and she used to wear padded push up bras all the time, now she’s felt the pressure of being uuber curvy and has resorted to surgery.
It’s a shame as all women come in different sizes including women with smaller breasts….it’d be nice for a healthy toned woman out there with smaller breasts to be a role model for teens who promotes the view that small boobs can be sexy/attractive to men too…
Kim has an amazing body, if she toned up she’d win hands down
they both look great. but i think nicole has the best body. if she was a little bit taller she would probably be perfect.
Why is being of average or lower than average height seen as such a bad thing?
i aint saying its a bad thing. i personally think tall is more beautiful (:
So true. Most models I have seen are just exceptionally tall, not exceptionally beautiful. In fact most of their faces are average. I have seen many woman who are short to average height who are way more beautiful, with much more stunning faces, and better, more proportionate figures.
You can gauge someone’s beauty by how men would react to them, instead of women, because women are more judgmental, whereas men are just naturally attracted to a woman who they find beautiful. If you put one of those very beautiful shorter to average height women that you see around, and taller models in a room, the men would 9/10 times be more attracted to the short/average height woman.
Vivian Leigh, who played Scarlett O’ Hara in Gone with the Wind, was only 5′3″, and I have yet to see many women who are more naturally beautiful than her.
But that’s the point
Height doesn’t gurantee beautiful.Unfortuntaley, height doesn’t equal a great body, instead you can have an average height and have a great body. We have Nicole and Marissa Miller as examples. Just making a point 
, no offense meant…
I wonder that too. I blame the modelling industry.
You’re probably right. I used to post on a fashion forum where several people seriously believed being short was equal to being a repulsive ogre.
Short, tall or average height is all neutral to me. Either quality alone can never equal ‘beautiful’. There is so much more to beauty than measurements alone.
Really? I have always thought she is quite tall, at least she looks really tall!
I don’t get that statement either. Woman come in all shapes and sizes. She’s stunning at the height that she’s at.
Kim!
i prefer kims body but she does look she could get really huge really quickly. i wonder what her body will look like after she has kids
They both look great, but as the owner of big ole bubble butt myself, I’d have to say Nicole’s figure is neater. Big bums mess up the lines of clothes & proportionality!
even though im a curvy women i would have to pick Nicole on this one. she has a better complexion and toned and not glammed up with a bunch of makeup to pose for the paparazzi. Kim on the other hand i really cant say too much about because im not sure whats “real or fake”.
kim k all the way!!!
tough, Kim from waist up, Nic from waist down lol. Although if I looked like either I’d be chuffed!
Nicole doesn’t really have any flaws, but I still prefer Kim’s curves. Much as I dislike Kim as a person, I think she’s incredibly gorgeous and her body’s amazing. Maybe her butt is just a little too big but I’d rather have one like her’s than my own flat ass.
I like both. I prefer Kim because she have a natural bodytype. Nicole has worked out to obtain those lines.
=))))) Kim is natural. Wow this is smth new.
Kim? Natural?
Riiiiiiight. And pigs can fly. Kim does have a stunning figure but she’s had a lot of help from the looks of her proportions (and also judging from the Kardashian’s family love affair with plastic surgery).
Nicole on the other hand is that chick who keeps herself fit to get to look the way she does without the help of liposuction or butt implants or god knows what else. She may have had boob implants, someone mentioned this, I don’t know, but if she did, they look natural on her.
Both look really awesome. Kim has a slightly more exaggerated curves but both have gorgeous figures.
Nicole is perfect, Kim’s body is weird…
they both look great but i’d choose nicole
Nicole definitely
And I’m not bashing on Kim, I know a lot of people say the camera makes you look bigger than you really are, but no camera adds a butt like hers.
i think kim’s butt is too big, sorry, even if some of you like that, but she doesn’t look body- (and other-)wise bette than nicole – never!
they have basically the same shape, but nicole’s skin looks younger/better..
Can you believe they put Kim on the cover of Muscle and Fitness Hers?? What a freakin’ joke!
Nicole looks 30 times better…
Nicole’s body is toned and looks a little fitter than Kim’s but so what if they put kim on their cover…she says she works out alot and she looks really toned and fit…so why not? Just because she has an ass? That dosent mean she isnt healthy and fit.
Well Kim is the girl of the moment, the Muscle Fitness people know what they are doing in order to sell magazines.Please dont be so vile.
Well, Michelle, being a health nut and fitness enthusiast myself, I find it rather ridiculous to put a non-athlete on the cover of a fitness magazine. These models are supposed to be toned, lean and muscular. If I wanted to look at a body type like Kim’s to get inspired, I’d open the pages of Marie Claire instead.
You’re so right! I actually found kim releasing a workout video offensive. B/c she does not have the body to promote sports. She may work out, she may have a flat abs – with lipo written all over it, but let’s pretend she works out – but she has no muscle definition or muscle tone. I want the person that gives me a work out example to be an inspiration, body wise.
How about she be an inspiration to us women that can’t get all that obvious muscle tone like those athletes and sports models? It’s not just those types of women that get health/fitness mags or videos, so what’s wrong with some women that aren’t sporty looking gracing the covers and being instructors? We can be just as healthy as them, don’t see why we can’t be represented too.
B/c first of all i don’t consider that only muscle ladies are healthy. Keep in mind that i did not suggest kim is unhealthy. But that abs is not the result of working out. I know how it’s supposed to look after working out, and the flat she is showing us is a lie. Second of all, a fitness instructor is someone who actually worked hard to get there. It is not easy to get there, and i think it’s disrespectful towards them to suggest that anyone can be a fitness instructor. Normal women are not required to be all muscle, it would be at least weird. But when you are the image of sports, when you promote and you live through and by sports, you need to look in a certain way. A way that is credible. And kim is not by far credible. And she just seeks attention no matter how. Do you honestly think that it’s a good idea to look up to her the way you look up to a profesional athlete? Who can surely help you obtain what you want, sports-wise. I don’t think so. I said it: if she works out, fine, she’s doing it for yourself. You need to be smth else to be a fitness instructor. Kim is not.
*doing it for herself, sorry
I can not look like a sporty looking lady, at least not with out devoting most of my time to it and not having time for anything else in my life, so why would I want to use them for my physical fitness inspiration? Yes, I do look up to female athletes, they work hard for what they accomplish, but I’m not a female athlete, so they are not my inspiration. Someone like Kim is more my inspiration, she shows that you can be fit and soft at the same time, and I don’t see how her decision to try and be a fitness instructor is some how insulting to other fitness instructors. Well, except for the lipo bit, that is a good point there if she really has had lip and doesn’t work out, but you made it sound more like a woman that is naturally like Kim is wrong to be an instructor, and not just because of the lipo because you even made it a point to say “but lets pretend she works out”, like you were trying to make your point without the lipo being an issue. I’m sorry, but if a woman is fit, and can share how she became fit, why does it matter if she doesn’t look like the other instructors? What’s so great about a whole bunch of muscle tone anyway, especially if you have to spend more time on it than you really need to spend to be healthy? If I have to spend 4+ hours a day to be toned because that’s how people think women should look, but only need to spend 1 hour or so a day to be healthy, I’m going to go with healthy, I think that’s more important than “beauty” ideals. IMO, if a woman is accomplished, fit, and healthy, and she knows how to show others how to do it, good on her, I don’t give a rat’s butt as to what she looks like. You know there’s a heavy set lady that is a yoga instructor and has videos out for it? Awesome there IMO, she’s fit and she’s showing others how to do it, but she’s not the “conventional” fitness instructor.
Sorry for the rant Uma, my issue wasn’t with your opinion about Kim, per say, it is just seemed to me that you are suggesting that a woman with Kim’s particular build, and being naturally so, should not be trying to be a fitness instructor because they don’t look like athletes.
If a woman is naturally shaped like Kim, is truly fit and healthy but isn’t showing a lot of muscle tone because her body just isn’t built that way with out extreme measures, why can’t she be a fitness instructor? That’s my issue, I just can’t wrap my head around why a fit, healthy, but “soft” woman shouldn’t be telling other women how to exercise and be healthy. Doesn’t make any sense to me. She’s healthy, shouldn’t that be all that matters? Why does she have to look “fit”, can’t a woman look fit and soft at the same time and be able to share her “secrets”?
well i don’t think kim has anything done to her body. i also don’t think she lies about it but for me she has a nice figure and is in great shape. i respect your opinion and all but i think putting kim on a fitness magazine isn’t a bad thing.
I also don’t think Kim lies about her body, and I don’t think she is fake. The majority of Middle Eastern women who are slim have naturally very curvy proportions with a tiny waist, it’s jsut our genes. I myself am 34D-25-36, and I’m not Armenian, but I am Middle Eastern as well. If you had ever visited Lebanon, Iran, or Jordan and saw the women there you would know what I am talking about.
i agree. just because kim doesn’t have any muscle tone to her body doesn’t mean she shouldn’t be on the cover. i think kim’s body is nice and goes to show you that you can be fit but also have a softness to your body. i like having my stomach flat and not so muscular looking.
I understand your points, i did not consider it ranting, but i still don’t agree that a fitness instructor should look like kim
) It’s just the way i see it and it’s just what motivates me. To put it like this: personally, i want the person who shows me how to be fit to be, well, fitter than me. And kim is not, so there is where my problem comes from. It’s a very subjective matter, and anyone should look up to whoever they want, as long as it motivates them. About the lipo – actually, it was a problem, and i was just being ironic over there about her so-called abs. And there is one thing i totally agree with you: i don’t think that a woman should be a muscle pack. I didn’t want to suggest that. I am sorry if i offended anyone, i was extremely subjective and as i’ve said it before, i just can’t admire kim’s body b/c she lies about it, b/c she has done surgery and so on. Nothing personal with anyone here, i know my standards are the weird ones.
Leanna, lol, that’s … intriguing (not in a pleasant way, for sure)
Uma in the UK all the celebs lose weight then release fitness videos, it’s effing hilarious!
The only decent celebrity DVD workout I’ve found was Lady Isabella’s Hervey’s Power Workout. She’s now a qualified personal trainer and definitely someone to promote health and fitness.
DrTruth..I am a health nut and a runner so I can speak on this as much as you can. I personally find Kim’s body beautiful and healthy and I don’t think you need to be a heavyweight body builder to be on a health magazine. Not everyone can look like an athelete but they sure in the hell can still be healthy. What it comes down too is that you have your opinion and I have mine. I am not trying to argue with you..just saying that alot of woman work out like crazy and eat healthy and are fit but still a little soft.
I can see your point about this particular magazine.
Nicole’s body is pretty much perfect. Definitely an inspiration.
Kim is gorgeous, face-wise, and her body is, although a bit too curvy for my taste, quite nice. But putting her next to Nicole makes her look flabby, especially in the stomach region. Seriously, she has NO tone there, yet it’s perfectly flat.. Lipo, for sure.
nicole, definately! she looks gorgeous!
Nicole Scherzinger VS Kim Kardashian! …kenalan donk.andomwi@yahoo.co.id
Nicole looks much better because she is thiner,but they both have short legs which is not ok at all…and they both have pretty faces:)
I think that both are beautiful ladies, both very different though. Its great to have a toned healthy body no doubt that genetics and exercise come into play as well. Case in point, Nicole being part Asian and Kim being part Armenian both different set of genes. I like the Pussy cat dolls ok, however Kim having a show has catapulted her onto the scene she seems very sweet and down to earth and I like that she seems quite humble and not full of her self. She is probably on the cover of Muscle Fitness because of her popularity.
Clearly Kim’s tush is something she was born with, she works at it but at the end of the day she just has that hourglass figure. She is still on best body lists everywhere though! The girl dresses amazing 24-7 is classy and if she wants to wear makeup to the beach who cares! I have seen her without makeup and she is just as gorgeous. We should all be so lucky.
Kim has butt implants people. Don’t be fooled by her dishonesty and lies.
kim all the way. Nicole’s butt is too non existant.
i prefer kim from the front and nicole from the back! tht’s it…
that’s*
Nicole has an enviable figure but I also think Kim looks really hot! I think it’s great that people don’t have to look the same to be hot! I would love to look like either of them!
XXX
Kim, absolutely!
I think Kim’s body is perfect
Nicole doesn’t have any curves if you ask me. Her middle section is quite straight.
Both girls have beautiful, healthy bodies, but I find myself preferring Kim. She has managed to work her way to a flat stomach and toned legs without loosing her curves, which is a great accomplishment. Also, her legs seem to be very muscular (in a good way), while Nicole’s seem slightly flabbier. I myself often do Kim’s workout… she is extremely dedicated to fitness and health, and is a great role model for not starving herself or trying to achieve a super-skinny figure. She is great the way she is!
I really agree with you on this one “while Nicole’s seem slightly flabbier”. I also noticed that when I compared their bodies. Nicole has flabbier legs / thighs and Kim’s are more muscular.
Britney’s body is the best!!!
Their bodies aren’t proportionated,they have both unattractive legs,too short,but I think they have cute faces,especially Nicole
Excuse me, but well, wow. Some of the people on here really dissapoint me. Judging these womens bodys so harshly. You know, i’m a fourteen year old girl with a build similar to kim’s. To hear people bashing her, when she’s in such good shape compared to me, it hurts honestly. It’s hard with our body type. Hourglasses have muscular bodies, while pear shape (kim’s pear shape wether you want to accept it or not) is a softer shape and really hard to build lean muscle. People saying she’s out of shape, fat, un proportioned. It’s honestly something else. I guess i’m just an ugly girl who will never be thought of as pretty no matter how hard she tries. Maybe most of you have perfect bodies who are making the comments, but could you please just tone it down abit. I really don’t want my body shape, but i’m trying to accept it. But hearing people like “instant” is making me feel horrible. Like nobody’s ever going to think i’m pretty. And I know I sound like a wuss right now, and i’m sorry. But i feel like crap now. Could your please remember that girls like me or on this website. Were trying to find role models to make myself feel better about my body where everybody is thin and perfect. And if they’re curvy, it comes in a slimmer package. God, I’m sorry for rambling. But, im never going to be thought of as pretty and people are going to be thinking nasty about me like the people on here. right? …
Hi Michelle,
I am sorry that the some of the comments were a little harsh on you.
Please remember, no matter how you look, no matter if you are curvy, skinny, very voluptuous, thick or athletic, some people will find your shape very attractive / the most attractive one. If you look in this post, some people do prefer Kim’s curvy shape, some find her perfect.
One of the points of this site is to show that people have different preferences and we are against the media / Hollywood trends that dictate that ALL women should be size 0 / have no cellulite / plastic / or perfectly and evenly proportioned like a curvy goddess. We believe that all people should be true to their shape and should remain at their natural, comfortable and healthy weight.
Please do not let these comments get to you, as I am sure that you have a lovely figure, just embrace it and stay true to yourself.
Nicole for sure …
I prefer Nicole’s fit look.
Though I think Kim looks great too.
Being short I prefer Kim’s height to Nicole’s.
I’m surprised evreyone is going for Nicole!
I bet if you asked guys instead of girls, 90% of them would go with Kim Kardashian!
In this pic nicole is not as skinny as when she starts doing video clips and going on concerts…she looks really hot and healthy!! not skinny in any way, just slim, curvy and fit. I usually don’t get inspired by celeb bodies, but Nicole is an exception here!!
They both look fantastic though, but Kim K is obviously a fake (albeit a gorgeous, curvy fake), there’s no way that butt is real (brazillian butt lift anyone?), and she looks like she had some lipo done around her thighs, because real spoon/pear shaped girls have saddlebags and we all know how the Kardashians are obsessed with plastic surgery (look at daddy Kardashian’s face…creepy).
So I’ll go for Nicole who looks and is much more likely to be natural.
Its so Hard …
Both are Hot …
I prefer Nicole’s
Slim and Curvy at the same time
ummmm i really dont know they both kinda look the same & both have amazing bodies
Someone said earlier that opinions can be wrong. The statement itself is illogical. Opinions are not general truths, and they are not right or wrong, that’s why they are calles opinions, they express a personal pov, what WE think is right. Otherwise, these discussions and contradictions wouldn’t exist, the terms personal preference and taste wouldn’t exist, personal choices either. ” Anonymus” stated THEIR personal opinion, thinking THEY are right, and I think they are WRONG. When we talk about aht each one likes better, we are not talking about general truths. The Earth is round, that is a general truth. What I like or dislike or what I think of other’s opinions is my perception, and the other person has theirs.
KIM KARDASHIAN!!! omg she’s so hot! I love her big juicy butt!