Kim Kardashian Says She’s 117 Lbs and Fits in Size 27 Jeans
September 23, 2008 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Kim Kardashian by Versus
This will be a fun read… Kim Kardashian recently posted on her blog a ton of information about her weight, size and body measurements. What did she have to say?
I am a size 27 jeans… My measurements are 34, 26, 39. But remember I am 5′2″ and 1/2 and everyone carries their weight in different places.
My body frame is small, but since I have curves, many people assume I am bigger and wear a bigger size in jeans. This is simply not the case! The misconception carries over to my weight, too. I am right under 120 lbs, but a lot of people have been shocked to hear that and have accused me of lying! Haha. (…)I was clear to state that everyone carries their weight differently. I have very skinny chicken legs, so my jeans need to be a smaller size to fit my legs. I have a tiny waist, which is smaller than a size 27 so i always need to have the waist tailored.I also wear stretch jeans, because my booty just gets flattened in any jean that has no stretch and just doesn’t fit into non stretch jeans. I usually wear Serfonatine or JBrand, those fit the best! In those certain brands, on a good day I even fit into a size 26! I am a lot smaller than I look in pictures or on TV and that’s the first thing people say when they meet me! When I first started doing photo shoots, stylists would bring me a size 6 or 8, and they had to come back with 2’s and 4’s. I am only 117 lbs!
I am really sick and tired of people being so mean and nasty and assume I am lying. Why should it upset people that I am a size 27? Kourtney is a size 23 or 24, if she can find her size and wears kid sizes most of the time, and Khloe is a size 30. We are all shapped differently and are proud of our shape big or small….
Conclusion: The measurements that Kim provided indicate a BMI of 21.4, which is in the middle of the healthy range (18.5 – 25). I am pretty sure that these stats will cause a little controversy and that some will say “No way she fits in size 27 jeans / is 120″, but then again, she’s not very muscular, she’s very short and besides her big butt, she’s quite a slender girl. Definitely don’t agree about the “very skinny, chicken legs” part, though.
What do you say? Do Kim’s measurements and sizes sound realistic to you?
UPDATE: Due to the fact that she received many comments from people saying that she can not possibly be that small, Kim also made a little video entitled “See, I told you!” and put it on her blog – in the video, she tried on 3 pairs of jeans in front of the camera, 2 of them size 27 and one pair size 26. And yes, she did get inside them – yes, they were tight on her butt and yes, she tried to squeeze herself in, but they did fit.
her weight sounds plausible to me, as she’s quite short and the only big part in her is her butt. anyways, i feel kinda appalled, that she feels like she needs to explain in wide and lenghth her body measures etc pp. she seems to be a little insecure.
OMG, she went through sooo much trouble for what… to show us that she’s a size 27 – so what does that prove? Only the fact that she’s looking for extra publicity and that NO, she is not comfortable in her CURVY skin.
Totally agree.
Her scale may be altered
I doubt it that she’s 117… really really doubt it. More like 135. The 27 size… well, it can depend on the brand but I think something’s fishy about the weight.
If she tried on the jeans (and 3 pairs, not 1!!), why didn’t she also step on the scale??
Delany, Why do you doubt Kim’s remarks. I’m an athlete and a proud Brazillian and I have the same body type as Kim. Tiny, tiny waist and blessed with a beautiful, sexy butt. I wear a size 27, 26 in Joes, Citizens etc. It’s so disgusting how you would doubt it or why it would even matter. Kim is sexy, healthy. I go through the same thing-people thinking Im larger than I am – then they see me in a swim suit and are like damn you have a banging body…….and I would keep my size rock ass 117 booty than a flabby flat one like you probably have any day.
i doubt the weight part too. I am 5′1, waistline 28, bust is 36, hips 37 and I weigh 124 lbs. But then I am 52 years old. I don’t know if age makes a difference here.
I guess i believe that they were actually size 27 jeans, but HOLY! Did you see her yanking and pulling on those things?! I wouldn’t be able to breathe if I had to work that hard to pull on my jeans, stretch or not, those puppies were waaay too tight, she’d be more comfortable in a size up. We all know she’s got more generous proportions in the posterior area, who cares what size her jeans are!
But I think it’s an even bigger stretch to say she’s 117, she is quite short and petite, but I’d peg her at 125, at least.
OMG I am laughing my ass off. Kim weighs so much more than that, I’ve seen her IRL and she is short but she’s got at lot of fat. And I am 120 lbs and I wear a size 26, so that just can’t be true. Look at her ass she is at least a size 31.!!!
That’s totally possible. Her measurements aren’t that far off from my wife’s. And she has the same problem, with people always assuming she’s skinnier than she is.
id like to see her stepping on a scale on camera, coz i dont believe her weight, i would of thought at least 130. but hmm wot can i say im nt an expert, but i just dont believe that.
Someone that’s 5′1 is going to carry their weight differently than someone who is 6′1. I think she’s telling the truth.
WTF, I don’t get why everyone is doubting that she’s 117. She’s 5′2!! That’s tiny! No way in hell she weighs 130-135, as some of you claim. Hell, I weigh 130-135 and I’m five inches taller than her, and exept for my butt I look like I’m pretty much the same size. (btw, this picture is a pretty bad angle, if you look at others she seems much slimmer.)
Also, I don’t get why she needs to justify herself so much. Who on earth cares so much about her measurements/weight/jean size that they need videos to prove it?
Yeah i believe kim…she is a very very similar body type to me…
we work in kilos here though how many kilos is 117 pounds?
like 55? that is so believable! camera adds weight and she is short!
plus who cares??? bit of a shame she had to come out and make a big deal because now evryone will just make it a big deal…
but i think its believable…
plus she has lost weight recently!
Yeah I definetely belive her, 117 isn´t THAT little for someone her height (my friend is as tall Kim ja weights 95 kilos and does not look too thin) , but I DO NOT agree with her about “very skinny chicken legs”
[...] Kim recently blogged on and on about how she’s a size 2 and a 26 / 27 in jeans (and made a video where she squeezed her butt inside the jeans), about how she’s 117 pounds and it’s unfair that some people don’t believe her. You didn’t have the pleasure to read Kim’s blabbering? Then click here! [...]
[...] Kim recently blogged on and on about how she’s a size 2 and a 26 / 27 in jeans (and made a video where she squeezed her butt inside the jeans), about how she’s 117 pounds and it’s unfair that some people don’t believe her. You didn’t have the pleasure to read Kim’s blabbering? Then click here! [...]
[...] thing: Since Kim called her own legs “chicken legs” (if you don’t remember, click here), then what can we say about [...]
its true what she says and if you´re not a woman then you don´t understand…i use size 9 but when i look for jeans the clerk usually says if she brings me a 7…so some of us look smaller other look wider
you kno what you girls are just jealous and some of my girls are between 5′1 and 5′4 and they are about 110 and 116 and they are thick and curvy kim is very pretyy and you fat asses are just jealous get up off of your fat asses and get to the gym instead of talkin ish about people hmmm i smell somethin burnin oooh i kno it must be some jealous ass haters get over it seriously its no annoying that you fat girls have so much time to hate rather than using that time to go take care of yourselfs its always insecure girls that think they are hot and they are actually the ugliest things alive walking around on this earth its liek a girl should run her mouth when she has the looks to go with it umming BOOO HOOOOO get over it stupid ass ugly hatin asses piss off
From an African-American standpoint, she does have chicken legs. Especially in proportion to her upper body. A bigger butt doesn’t always mean bigger thighs (it should if it’s a real butt). And since we know Kim has a fake one, it’s what makes her thighs look every skinnier. Body-wise, the kardashian girls are built like their mother with a big upper body, as in average-sized to heavier boobs, a gut, or at least an appearance of a gut because of their lower-halves, narrow hips and skinny, chicken legs. The only reason Kim seems more proportioned than her sisters is because of her butt.
I doubt if she has an implant…thats the only way i would consider it “fake”. If she simply had fat injections or transfered fat from (lets say her stomach) to butt, then its not fake. My ex girlfriend had fat moved from stomach and waist to butt…and there was nothing fake about it… That would be like someone gaining weight (fat) in their stomach or arms or legs and calling it fake. Its all for show anyways…no matter what type of enhancement people get…breast implants, weaves, nails, eyelashes….if something doesnt look good to you thats fine but as long as it looks good the whole “its fake” thing really becomes a moot point…it doesnt make sense to say something like…”if her butt wasnt fake it would look good”
i dont know……….. im 5 nothing my hips/ass measures he same as hers and i wear a size 8/31……my waist is bigger the hers, but my ass cant get into a size 4/27.
wooow stop here she is defenetly not 120 actually she wish… she is like at least 20 lbs bigger i wear 28- 29 size jeans and I’am 128 lbs im 6 feet tall but thats only worse because if i’am taller i have to be thinner if I am the same weith………… :X:X:X…
wooow stop here she is defenetly not 120 actually she wish… she is like at least 20 lbs bigger i wear 28- 29 size jeans and I’am 128 lbs im 6 feet tall but thats only worse because if i’am taller i have to be thinner if I am the same weith………..
[...] just read that Kim Kardashian’s measurements are 35-26-40 and at 117 lbs (and 5′2″) she’s a size 2/4. I thought that was [...]
Ok my measurements are 34 26 40 and I weight 133 lbs and I am 5 2 so she is 1/2 taller than me lol this girl know she is lying….o and I work out so its not fat hahaha…. my pants are a size 5-7 and my shirts are a size small…. kim please get off your high horse and go sit down somewhere.
Well, I am 5 ‘2, And my measurements are 38-27-40, and I had a baby 3 months ago. My mneasurements used to be 36-26-40 prepreg, but yeah…And I used to be 120 exactly. And when I was 110 lbs a before that, my measurements were pretty much exactly like hers. I think give or take an inch. So its very possible. Although, her jeans…a bit tight…if you cant breathe getting into them and it takes 10 minutes to peel them off…you need a size bigger. but there is NOTHING wrong with that. Skinny WILL be out soon, and curvy will be back in .Real women have curves- deal with it twigs!!
whoever doesn’t think she’s 117 n a size 27 needs to stop hating. if u look at pics she really does have a small waist. and look at her legs! she really is tiny. i’m about the same exact measurements and i’m the same height as her. being that she’s so short, her weight makes her APPEAR bigger, dumbasses. i’m 5′2″ and my size is 34-25-36…and ppl say i’m small AAALLLL the time! but my cup is a DD and i have a butt! damn it doesn’t mean i’m fat cuz i have curves!
well I think it is possible she weighs 120 pounds and her height, she’s small, and it “looks” heavier on her, by the way someone who’s her height and weight and excercises would look different than someone who weighs that and doesn’t. I’m 5′3” and I weigh 116 pounds and I wear a size 25, and I’m only a bit taller and lighter than her. my measurements are 34, 24.5 and 33 . I also fing it strange that a woman has to justify her weight, whats the big deal if she’s 100 lbs or 140 lbs.
People have got to get over being so obsessed with weight, and thats comming from a girl recovering from an eating disorder …
i don’t see why everyone thinks she’s 130-135. cuz i’m 135, and 5′8″, i can fit in size 27 if i struggle as much as her (but i don’t like to so i wear 28) and my measurements are appx. 33-25-39. (yeah, all my weight goes to my butt.)
WOW!!! you people are really hatin on kim k! I am 5 inches taller than her and 135 lbs if you do the math my bmi is around 21, i also wear a size 27 and my measurements are 32-26-39 almost the exact measurements as kim! except i have a super tiny bust, it is very possible for her to wear size 27 jeans but ONLY if they’re stretchy! I have the same problem with the booty being flattened by non-stretchy jeans or barely being able to get it in there! FOR ALL YOU FLAT ASS LADIES any girl with any kind of booty is going to have to struggle to get her ass in jeans, no matter how skinny or fat she might be? why are you hatin on her for struggling to get her jeans on? that means she has ass!!! hellooo! I’m white so I can’t shop at american eagle or abercrombie most white girl stores cause their jeans do NOT stretch! quit hatin on kim!
its possible kim MAY way 117llbs but the fact that her butt fits in size 27 jeans? i dont think so im the Same size as she is measurments 38 24 40 and no way can my ass fit in a size 27 having a butt bigger than a 38 would almost be impossible i do not believe in a million years she would wear that size.. when i put on a 27 the pants dont even fit past my crack kim mustve had those damn pants tailored or something.
KiM iS TELLiNG THE TRUTH!! iVE MET HER AND HUNG OUT WiT HER B4 AND SHE’S SMALLER THEN ME! i AM 5′5 AND WEiGHT 140. WE HAVE THE SAME MEASUREMENTS AND HER BUTT LOOKS WAYY SMALLER iN PERSON!! SHE’S TiNY! CURVY BUT TiNY!
KiM iS TELLiNG THE TRUTH!! iVE MET HER AND HUNG OUT WiT HER B4 AND SHE’S SMALLER THEN ME! i AM 5′5 AND WEiGHT 140. WE HAVE THE SAME MEASUREMENTS AND HER BUTT LOOKS WAYY SMALLER iN PERSON!! SHE’S TiNY! CURVY BUT TiNY!
P.S: i WEAR A SiZE 27 IN JEANS!
I don’t really see how that weight is possible. I am 5′7, weight 150 lbs, and I measure at a 36D, 26, 40. My largest asset is my bottom, graced with an apple bottom. I don’t see how her weight, at that height, with that much cellulite could be so low. Perhaps now a vid of her stepping on a scale?
I don’t think Kim is lying. I think she may be right at 120 pounds. She is not that muscular, so maybe this is why she does not weight that much. Muscle weighs more than fat. She and I have about the same measurements (34,27, 39) 5″2 inches,and I weigh 127 1bs. However I weigh a little more because I lift alot of weights. I got a big ol’ booty like her too, but small breast B cup. I wear size 27 jeans too. So I think she is telling the truth.
she is telling the truth ! ! ! we are the same hight and weight but my ass is smaller and tummy larger. she looks great ! ! ! give her a break
I think it is possible, I’m 5′2 as well and i weight 114lbs and im a 36d-26-38 so its possible
I’m not sure what us women are supposed to weigh. I’ll step on a scale on camera any day, and I’m 6′1 and fluctuate between 135 and 145 pounds. My measurements are 36, 28, 38. I have no idea whether that’s good or bad. I just want to say that Kim and her sisters are beautiful and I would LOVE to have a body like hers!
im sorry, but just the faco alone that her measurements end in 39…. means she does not fit into a 27 jean i don even where 4’s anymore and my hips are 34… 27 is a long ways away from 39… sry kim
I am 5′2” and have a similar body to Kim and weigh 115 pounds and fit in a 27 size jeans. So I totally believe her.
She’s def not lying. I am 5′2′ and weigh 108 and wear a size 28 jean but I carry all my fat on my thighs. She’s right everyone carries their weight differently. Even though I only weigh 108, I don’t look skinny by any means b/c I’m so short. For ppl who think she weighs 130 or whatever, believe me at her height she would look like a total porker if she weighed that much!
Well I believe about the whole size 27 jeans but yeah the weight is a bit odd. I’m 5′6 and fit into a size 28 I weigh 148 and I’m slender as well so knock a few inches off and your kim’s size.. and with a booty and legs like that 117 lb doesn’t make a lot of sense plus her breast are big. I mean it doesn’t add up in my opinion. I’m guessing her weigh in is about 125 or 123. But then again I may be wrong.
I completely believe her! there is no way she is 130 or 135! u ppl suck at guessing weight. She’s short and slim the only thing that makes her look so big is her butt. I am 5ft 110 pounds and I look bigger cuz of my height so 110 is big on me but to others is like wow so small! 120 for 5′2” is about the same for me and she looks slimmer than me in the upper body her butt is huge thats why she looks bigger also because she’s short she looks wider than she really is. Idk about the 27 jeans I believe she fits in them but thats not the size she usually wears her butt is too big to fit in them. But she definately weighs around 117 120 at the biggest 125 but i dont think so
Wow, Why does it matter so much to all you people.
Kim is so beautiful, I suggest you all stop hating on her and get more of a social life.
I actually wish I looked like Kim.
My measurements are 34 27 38 and I’m 5′6
I wear size 27 and sometimes 29..
I weigh 135 pounds
But size is just a number.
Why does it matter SO much.
I think she is sexy, and I’m working towards having a sexy stomach like hers.
I agree she is beautiful and what difference does it make to anyone. However, it is twofold. Kim should have never even taken so much time to prove to a bunch of strangers her size. I mean, as long as Reggie likes it, what else matters????
She may be 117lbs. if she has not eaten anything all day just to be weighed on the scale.
She’s hot. I like it all BUT her BUTT. Can someone really be a size 2 if their A$$ is the size of Wisconsin?
I’m just sayin…
OKAY i honestly do not believe that kim is only 117, i can see her being in the 120’s though, i have the exact same body as miss. kim here, exact im 5,8′!!!! im a 42, 28, 45…. so im actually even curvier than here, and its all mine, noooo fat, no implants….. i weigh 145…..
I’m not too sure WHY she’d even post all that, or why it matters she can squeeze that butt into size 26. But I believe her. A good stretch in jeans is nice because everyone has diffrent shapes. Your meat maybe in your butt, thighs, waist. Buy what fits, not what you THINK fits.
Kim is short, jeans probably need to even be hemmed.
I’m 5′7 and wear a 25-27. I’ve also had two children! 27 non stretch jeans so they don’t squeeze my stomach and make uncessary muffin top (even though I could cram myself into a 25)….and 25 stretch so they don’t click when I walk. Ya know? When you have excess material between the legs and they rub and click? I’m sorry but that happens and its frickin’ annoying.
Good on Kim. She’s lucky to have a lil’ somethin’ somethin’ to cram into pants and tops. Yay!
SHE IS NOT LYING!! I totally believe her..I am also 5′2 1/2 and my measurements are 34 26 38 and I weigh 116…I also wear a size 26-27..never bigger than a 27 cuz then its too big. Plus she wears stretch jeans which fit comfortably. I hate how people who are taller/shorter with completely different shaped/sized bodies compare to someone who is no where near their body shape or size. really..
Kim Kardashian is overrated and super conceited. She tries to talk about her measurements as if she is insecure but I think she just tries to fake it and really she just can’t stop talking about herself. Yea we get that she’s curvy but she kinda needs to get over herself cuz she isn’t the only girl in the world with curves. I don’t care what size she is, she annoys me cuz she’s crazy conceited
This actually sounds pretty accurate for Kim to be 5′2 1/2, 120 lbs. People don’t realize that everyone carries weight distribution differently and that cameras add weight. Not only that but alot of factors can make a person look bigger or smaller: the angle you look at them from, the mirror you’re looking in etc. I’m about 5′2, weigh 120 lbs if that much. I’m pretty petite, like Kim and Kourtney (half of the time when I was in high school I was actually shorter and smaller than Kourtney, I wore like a size 0 @ 75 lbs and was barely 4′11 my freshman and sophomore year of high school) But even though I’m petite I have gotten noticeably curvier over the years. (I’m 20 now) I think my measurements are somewhere around Kim’s but I’m not sure what Khloe and Kourtney’s measurements are. I’m 34D-26-36. My mom thinks my waistline is bigger than that lol. As for my size, I didn’t realize how close me and Kim were to the same size til I checked out some of her clothes on eBay. I usually wear a 5-7 which in foreign sizes I guess is 25-27 cuz I have a skirt that’s a 27. Oddly enough, I have skirts and jeans that are 9 that my cousin gave to me and I can actually fit them. And there are a pair of skinny jeans I have that are a size 3 that I got a few years ago that I can still fit. I’m actually pretty narrow and I’m just now starting to get hips, but at the same time I do have curves and a butt and muscles in my arms in legs. Some people think I wear like kid sizes lol whereas other people don’t even think a 7 would be big enough for me. I think it depends on the person cuz usually bigger people see smaller people a so tiny and vice versa. Overall, I love the Kardashian family and I think they’re all lovely no matter how big or how small they are. Just like the rest of us. So why does it matter what our body types and heights are? We’re all beautiful and sexy in our own way. I think Kim was confident enough to put their sizes out there because they have nothing to be ashamed of! None of us do! Plus, there are loads of different body types out there and 9/10 there might be some of us that fall into more than one category. Like there are petite or slender women that have curves, just like there are volouptuous women with small waistlines. No two body types are exactly alike. P.S. also, like a Kardashian I know what it’s like to be popular and have people hate on me.
This is total crap, I wish people would just be happy with their curves. KK was on the Wendy Williams Experience radio show once and Wendy measured her there on the spot- Kim was 35D chest, 26 1/2 waist and 40 hips… But I figured she was about that anyway, being that I am 5 ft 1, 36-28-40 myself. I’m Rican and yes all my weight is in the butt also but that doesn’t mean just bc your small everywhere but one place you fit into a size 27, lol. Kimmie a break.
I think that her claims sound very realistic to me. I wear the same size but I am 5′4″ and I weigh about the same weight. I would have thought that she actually would weigh less because she is only 5′2″ and I know that even if you are that short that you can be a curvy girl and only weigh very little. She does have a big butt, but that is most likely fat like most butts so fat doesn’t weigh as much a muscle would and most people should know that.
i am not being mean but she have butt and that can’t be in a size 27 i am 5′3 or 5′4 116 lbs and i am size 27 i have butt and that make me a 27 so she cant possibly be a 27 she is probably a 30 she is not fat just curvy i dont not why she need to explain herself comment like this make womens think they need to be certain size.
This is TOTALLY possible. I am also 5′2..34-bust, 28″ waist, and 39 1/2 hips..I weigh 118.5 and people ALWAYS are shocked when they see me in person. They say I look a lot thicker and taller in my pictures, but that in reality, I am the tiniest thing! Kim is such a gorgeous girl, in every sense, especially in the way she embraces her body. REAL women have curves, enjoy eating, and aren’t anorexic. Let her LIVE! I swear people can be so vicious and such haters, go get a life.