Kim Kardashian Says She’s 117 Lbs and Fits in Size 27 Jeans
This will be a fun read… Kim Kardashian recently posted on her blog a ton of information about her weight, size and body measurements. What did she have to say?
I am a size 27 jeans… My measurements are 34, 26, 39. But remember I am 5′2″ and 1/2 and everyone carries their weight in different places.
My body frame is small, but since I have curves, many people assume I am bigger and wear a bigger size in jeans. This is simply not the case! The misconception carries over to my weight, too. I am right under 120 lbs, but a lot of people have been shocked to hear that and have accused me of lying! Haha. (…)I was clear to state that everyone carries their weight differently. I have very skinny chicken legs, so my jeans need to be a smaller size to fit my legs. I have a tiny waist, which is smaller than a size 27 so i always need to have the waist tailored.I also wear stretch jeans, because my booty just gets flattened in any jean that has no stretch and just doesn’t fit into non stretch jeans. I usually wear Serfonatine or JBrand, those fit the best! In those certain brands, on a good day I even fit into a size 26! I am a lot smaller than I look in pictures or on TV and that’s the first thing people say when they meet me! When I first started doing photo shoots, stylists would bring me a size 6 or 8, and they had to come back with 2’s and 4’s. I am only 117 lbs!
I am really sick and tired of people being so mean and nasty and assume I am lying. Why should it upset people that I am a size 27? Kourtney is a size 23 or 24, if she can find her size and wears kid sizes most of the time, and Khloe is a size 30. We are all shapped differently and are proud of our shape big or small….
Conclusion: The measurements that Kim provided indicate a BMI of 21.4, which is in the middle of the healthy range (18.5 - 25). I am pretty sure that these stats will cause a little controversy and that some will say “No way she fits in size 27 jeans / is 120″, but then again, she’s not very muscular, she’s very short and besides her big butt, she’s quite a slender girl. Definitely don’t agree about the “very skinny, chicken legs” part, though.
What do you say? Do Kim’s measurements and sizes sound realistic to you?
UPDATE: Due to the fact that she received many comments from people saying that she can not possibly be that small, Kim also made a little video entitled “See, I told you!” and put it on her blog - in the video, she tried on 3 pairs of jeans in front of the camera, 2 of them size 27 and one pair size 26. And yes, she did get inside them - yes, they were tight on her butt and yes, she tried to squeeze herself in, but they did fit.
her weight sounds plausible to me, as she’s quite short and the only big part in her is her butt. anyways, i feel kinda appalled, that she feels like she needs to explain in wide and lenghth her body measures etc pp. she seems to be a little insecure.
OMG, she went through sooo much trouble for what… to show us that she’s a size 27 - so what does that prove? Only the fact that she’s looking for extra publicity and that NO, she is not comfortable in her CURVY skin.
I doubt it that she’s 117… really really doubt it. More like 135. The 27 size… well, it can depend on the brand but I think something’s fishy about the weight.
If she tried on the jeans (and 3 pairs, not 1!!), why didn’t she also step on the scale??
i doubt the weight part too. I am 5′1, waistline 28, bust is 36, hips 37 and I weigh 124 lbs. But then I am 52 years old. I don’t know if age makes a difference here.
I guess i believe that they were actually size 27 jeans, but HOLY! Did you see her yanking and pulling on those things?! I wouldn’t be able to breathe if I had to work that hard to pull on my jeans, stretch or not, those puppies were waaay too tight, she’d be more comfortable in a size up. We all know she’s got more generous proportions in the posterior area, who cares what size her jeans are!
But I think it’s an even bigger stretch to say she’s 117, she is quite short and petite, but I’d peg her at 125, at least.
OMG I am laughing my ass off. Kim weighs so much more than that, I’ve seen her IRL and she is short but she’s got at lot of fat. And I am 120 lbs and I wear a size 26, so that just can’t be true. Look at her ass she is at least a size 31.!!!
That’s totally possible. Her measurements aren’t that far off from my wife’s. And she has the same problem, with people always assuming she’s skinnier than she is.
id like to see her stepping on a scale on camera, coz i dont believe her weight, i would of thought at least 130. but hmm wot can i say im nt an expert, but i just dont believe that.
Someone that’s 5′1 is going to carry their weight differently than someone who is 6′1. I think she’s telling the truth.
WTF, I don’t get why everyone is doubting that she’s 117. She’s 5′2!! That’s tiny! No way in hell she weighs 130-135, as some of you claim. Hell, I weigh 130-135 and I’m five inches taller than her, and exept for my butt I look like I’m pretty much the same size. (btw, this picture is a pretty bad angle, if you look at others she seems much slimmer.)
Also, I don’t get why she needs to justify herself so much. Who on earth cares so much about her measurements/weight/jean size that they need videos to prove it?
Yeah i believe kim…she is a very very similar body type to me…
we work in kilos here though how many kilos is 117 pounds?
like 55? that is so believable! camera adds weight and she is short!
plus who cares??? bit of a shame she had to come out and make a big deal because now evryone will just make it a big deal…
but i think its believable…
plus she has lost weight recently!
Yeah I definetely belive her, 117 isn´t THAT little for someone her height (my friend is as tall Kim ja weights 95 kilos and does not look too thin) , but I DO NOT agree with her about “very skinny chicken legs”