Yet Anotother Size 2 Debate: This Time, Kim Kardashian
Here is “I wear size 27 jeans!!!” Kim Kardashian posing for OK Magazine while exercising - you got it, the article is about her getting in shape for Dancing with the Stars and blah blah, how Kim wants to get the perfect body before she gets pregnant. Another story.
The most captivating part of the article? Yeah, the one saying that Kim is a size 2. In case you missed it, here is what Kim was saying just a few days ago: “Stylists would bring me a size 6 or 8, and they had to come back with 2’s and 4’s. I am only 117 lbs!”
Firstly… she’s somewhere between 2 and 8, but now she’s definitely a 2. And secondly: hmm… am I allowed to doubt it?
What do you say? Will this be yet another drama over size 2? And just how exactly does a butt that measures 39 inches fit into size 2? Oh I know how: in a ballerina skirt… or in Mc Hammer’s pants.
Turn the page for more pics!
Photo credit: OK Magazine
12:57 pm on September 26th, 2008
Her top half looks about the same size as me, I am a UK size 10 on top and her bottom half looks like a UK size 10 to 12. I am a UK size 8 on bottom and she looks bigger than me on the pictures. She is no way a US size 2. I am not and I look smaller than her. Unless the pictures are unflattering, which I doupt as she would want to look as good as possible. I am saying she looks like a US size 6 OR 8. Especially looking at other celebs who are size 2, she is much rounder than them. Much fuller.
1:12 pm on September 26th, 2008
i thought she was the curvy poster child. why is she on such “i’m tiny and fit” kick? is it all cause of the paris cottage cheese trash bag comment?
it irks me!
2:52 pm on September 26th, 2008
well,let me just tell you,Im far away from being skinny but Im pretty short so I use a size 2 as well,so a lot of times size has nothing to do with weight but with your height…Im pretty sure she wears a size 2 too cuz see may have the bootie but when it comes to arms,legs or waist she is small!
6:20 pm on September 26th, 2008
Why would somebody want to get a perfect body before getting pregnant? Most people want to get a perfect body after it.
6:42 pm on September 26th, 2008
I’ve seen her in a bikini and she is at least a size 10
6:47 pm on September 26th, 2008
@ Ajka, here is what Kim said in the interview:
OK Magazine: Do you want to lose your famous curves?
Kim: No, not at all. I don’t even think that’s really possible. I’m going to probably have kids soon, so I want to have the perfect body before then. It’ll be harder to get in shape afterward, so why not do it now.
2:39 am on September 27th, 2008
She could be a 4. I’m a 4 and there’s the occasional item of clothing that is a 2 and I fit into it.
6:52 pm on September 27th, 2008
there is absolutely no way she is a 2. perhaps in skirts, but not in pants! we have almost identical measurements (thin waist…giant ass… i’m sadly not as blessed up top!) and i wear a size 6 or 28.
7:07 pm on September 27th, 2008
im a size 6 (in real) but a size 2 in most canadian boutiques. thats vanity sizing and it sucks. seriously. there is no shame in being a size 6, and Kim is probably a size 8, judging by her waist and hip sizes.
to be a real size 2, at 5 feet 2, she would need to weight “only” or less than 100 pounds ,and i dont think that would look great on her shapely body.
bu to be honest, she looks thinner than few months ago and she has a great body now.
6:20 pm on October 9th, 2008
she looks AMAZING. her body is to die for. i have a similar body but not so lucky to have such nice legs, mine are shorter and thicker. anyway, she is 5′2″ so she probably does wear 4’s or maybe 2’s in dresses. let me tell you that pictures ALWAYS make someone look bigger than they are. i’m a photographer and even super skinny girls i photograph look “normal” skinny- if you have any curves, you’re in danger of looking “chubby” rather than thin and shapely! it would be tough to have the world judge you merely on pictures and TV because you’ll never look exactly the same.
3:29 am on October 26th, 2008
I did a google search to find whether my measurements are the same as Kim’s. We are about the same height and weight (I am a little shorter but I hear that she overestimates her height) and weigh a couple of pounds less but our body type is exactly the same. And yes our measurements turn out to be almost identical with her hips a little larger than mine. And yes you can be a curvy woman and wear a 2, sometimes a 0, sometimes a 4. What are you guys all bitching about? She has a fit body, carries her fat very well, and seems like she has a healthy body image. Small size and skinny-ness does not equal flat butt or boys’ hips… Chill out haters