Emma Roberts, Blonder Beauty – Makeover or Makeunder?
November 14, 2009 in Makeover or Makeunder? by Versus
18 year-old Emma Roberts arrived at the Prada store on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills on Friday in a short dress that revealed her skinny legs.
How do you guys like her new hair color?
Emma Roberts, Blonder Beauty – Makeover or Makeunder?
See one more after the jump!
I think she’s such a beautiful girl, I thought she would have made such a pretty Bella instead of haggy Kristen Stewart. However the blonde is deffinately a make under, her dark locks make her pop.
don’t think she has the right attitude to play Bella …
but she is surely really beautiful.
the blonde hair suits her skin and face.
makeover
y is her foot blue?
Umm…It’s called a shadow.
She’s pretty…but I just want to scrub all her makeup off.
LOL harj is an idiot
LOL
make under btw
Still pretty but that’s a make under for me.
I like it, I think it makes her look more classy. Not that she wasn’t classy before.
She’s 18? She looks 10 years older with this hairdo.
totally agree… def makeunder, makes her look way older
Also agree.. it really aged her! She could pass for 30 with the blond hair.
my exact thoughts! and i would say 20 y. older..with bad lifting lol!
she was so cute before..and without that makeup..
i think she looks older with lighter hair, however she looks fine
18 years old? my god, she looks years older! The make up, the hairdo, the dress..she could be a thirty-year-old woman.
Looks like she got her lips done. So young for something like that.
As for the hair? I like it light- really brings our her eye color..
i think she’s stunning, i love the lighter locks, like dr. truth says, it brings out her eyes. her lips do look done though. top lip is a lot fuller.
Dark eyes don’t look good with blonde hair- unless it’s natural. I’ve never seen it look good when it’s fake.
That sack dress isn’t doing any favors for her scrawny body either.
Definitely a makeunder.
she kind of reminds me of brittany murphy. i liked her hair darker but she is still pretty either way! that tent of a dress on is terrible though.
I prefer brown hair. Its more girly and sweet.
I ADORE this young girl- she’s going to be THE hot commodity later in her career.
And blonde hair ALWAYS wins as an upgrade- I can’t think of one actress that’s gone blond that doesn’t look way hotter!
Jessica Alba- hotter blonde.
Sandra Bullock- hotter blonde.
Hillary Duff- hotter blonde.
Lindsay Lohan- hotter blonde.
Britney Spears- hotter blonde.
Denise Richards- hotter blonde.
Jessica Biel- hotter blonde.
and so on, and so on, and so on… Look, I LOVE brunettes- Evangeline Lilly and Lake Bell are two of my absolute favorites, but even in their cases- if they went blonde I bet they’d blow the hotness chart out of the water!
I think she’s looking great for her age. Sure, she could have a bit more meat on her legs, etc. but the stars have to keep that impossible size to keep employed- so long as other girls don’t try to emulate her weight/look, it’s fine. If they do- a parent should have been doing their job better.
I strongly disagree with you.
You might be the only person on the planet who thinks Lindsay Lohan and Jessica Alba look better blonde.
I agree with what B says. I really don’t think Lohan or Alba look better blonde. They have dark hair so when the roots show it’s not nice. Plus they have dair eyebrows and lashes so it just looks tacky to me. Oh and I dont believe that people can just choose to direct more “meat” to one area of their body ie legs. I think Emma looks great. Oh and I think Alba looks better with brown hair and Lohan red. Sorry just my opinion.
me too. lindsay looks best with red hair and jessica and sandra with brown. personally i prefer emma with the darker hair. but that dress is not helping. she should’ve belted it.
In my opinion, the only one of those who looks better blonde is Denise Richards. Surprise, surprise, she has blue eyes!
But seriously, Alba, Biel and Lohan? You’ve got to be kidding me. They each look far better with something closer to their natural hair color.
LOL! For sure! Lindsay? Jessica Alba? Jessica Biehl? They are WAY hotter BRUNETTE!
I actually don’t mind the blonde. Sure, I like the darker hair better (her skin looked creamier), but the blonde looks alright. I kind of love the dress, too. Good shoe choice as well.
also…i prefer her brunette.
Dark looked wayyy better. I don’t understand celebs changing their haircolor. Just stick to your natural hair color when you are young! It looks best! I think when your 30 and over, then you might want to consider coloring your hair, since the color gets more dull and you have greys. But at age 18!? I don’t get it. I’m sticking to my natural brunette hue for a while. The only thing I would consider getting at this age is very mild highlights, like one to two shades lighter just to brighten your face. But not such a drastic change as brunette to blonde.
BTW- Don’t you think her legs look sickly thin?
She’s always had really skinny legs like that, even when she was a 13-14 yo. So I don’t think she’s sick, that’s just her make-up.
Oh ok…they look really thin though. Almost like chicken legs lol. I guess if it’s natural then it’s okay
This irks me. What reason do I have to keep my natural hair colour?
makeUNDER for sure. she looks like shes 40.
With the light hair she looks kind of like she could be Mischa Barton’s sister. I think her hair looks nice both ways, but I don’t like her makeup in the picture of her with the lighter hair.
I think she’d have looked AWFUL if she’d gone any lighter…I DON’T think that people always look better as blondes…in many cases, they don’t (examples: Jessica Alba, Lindsay Lohan, Katherine McPhee, Kim Kardashian)
Oh, and her outfit is something a 70-year old lady might wear. Not a good look for an 18-year old!
Also, her lower legs are so scrawny that it looks like they can barely support her. Definitely Bosworth-esque. I’m sure the upper parts of her legs are tiny, too,but it’s not as easy to tell in this picture.
Oh when I left a post earlier on today I forgot to mention that although I prefer most celbs or people in gereal with their natural hair colour I don’t actually mind this colour on her, it’s a very grown up look on her. I mean she does look early 20’s and not 18 but cmon she cant stay 13 forever. Also I love her legs. I don’t think they are that small they just look smaller than they would normally cause she is wearing a baggy dress that makes everthing else look big hence making her legs look even smaller than usual. Anyone agree???
her legs do look kindas skinny and I hate that tent she is wearing also she looked more memorable as a brunette.
Makeunder. And I hate her makeup… she looks older.
Makeunder — darker locks made her look stunning. A true natural beauty. Now she just blends in with rest of Hollywood blonde wanna-be’s. And the make-up ages her about a decade. She no longer looks ‘fresh.’
Makeunder! I don’t know who she is but she looks beautiful as a brunette, the blond makes her look boring and older… but she has green eyes so maybe another kind of blond would look good on her..
Make under. She looks about 10 years older, now.
I didn’t even notice the hair- that eyeshadow is so AWFUL and distracting. She has a low eyebrow ridge that means she not be wearing such dark eye-shadow, particularly the same colour right up to the eyebrow. It makes her look so masculine!
I just really want to attack Emma with a pair of tweezers and eyebrow wax.
She looks beautiful and i like her outfit. Her hair is a natural shade of blonde, and it looks nice but it really does age her.
I like her look as well. She does look a lot older the way she is made up.
What? She’s my age. How’d that happen?
I thought she was a little kid..
Brunette definately!
I don’t know who she is but she is goregeous. a natural beauty who needs very litttle make-up. Watch out megan fox!
She is too skinny, and her lips are weird
Hmmm, her lips…She is okay…