Scarlett Johansson Looks Tiny in a Black Dress
Look at that waist! Her head is clearly bigger than her waist (is that a plus thing?)
OK, a little black dress and a classic cut always make you look thinner, but still: Scarlett is looking pretty tiny (not skinny, because she’s still got that softness about her, but tiny).
So how do you all like Scarlett here? Did you like the old Scarlett better, the curvier one with blonde hair?
2 more on the next page!
4,547 views
she looks way less curvy than usual!! still looks good though damn she’s beautiful!!
Hmm dont know! Cannot decide!
She’s sort of become a tiny doll version of her old self, its scary that although she still looks healthy and beautiful, compared to the other two ladies she is miniscule.Makes me wonder just how little the celebs who arn’t classed as curvy like scarlett are in comparison to ‘average’ sized girls…
Wow- soo much smaller than in ‘he’s just not that into you’.
She looked in and around 135-40 lbs then now I’d say 120lbs. Hmm she has a great figure but I think I prefer her in between both stages…
I don’t think she was 135 lbs, ’cause she’s only 5′3″!
I think she’s 5ft4 actually : P
I thought she was 5′4″ and though the camera adds lbs seeing her beside Drew etc I would have def put her 135 (which btw isn’t BIG but she did look Verrry curvy)
Sorry, my mistake. Yeah, she’s 1.62 m…
Sorry again, but she is 5′3″. She says it at the 3rd paragraph, in the centre of this link:
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/scarlett-johansson/scarlett-johansson-fights-weight-loss-rumours.html
I’ve seen it on most websites that she’s 5 4 but some say 5 3. Either way if she’s shorter just knock off 4 lbs…
For arguments sake, lets just say she is 5ft3 and 1/2 lol.
lol. Leanna, the argument has stopped an hour ago!
pppccc I think we should keep it going lol!!
I think she was never more than 125 and she is now around 105. She’s short. And curvy. Skinny curvy. Yes, amazingly, that does exist. If you lose weight you don’t lose curves. And if you gain weight you don’t gain curves. It comes with the body shape. You either have it or you don’t. She might as well be 90 lbs and still have curves.
I think you are more in the ballpark. I am a very fit 120 lbs, 5′4″ and she definitely looks smaller than I do in photos. I would guess 110 because her bones are not sticking out yet and she still has fat in the face. Her breasts are really small here.
They are talking about how much she weighted before! And I prefered her previous breasts
It just doesn’t look like Scarrlett anymore…
i don’t find her pretty at all, miniscule or curvy. what is it that makes her sexy? the goofy facial expression? the big nose? the long face? sorry, not for me.
on another topic: i really do wonder, how the celebs look in real life if its true, that pictures add some pounds. if so, i’d be seriously worried not only about scarlett, but more about giselle and others.
It is not true that camera adds, thanks to the tecnology. Plus, photos from events are usually photoshopped!Maybe some paparazzi pictures add because they aren’t clear, but not these ones…
Oh but it does. No matter how good the technology is, if you are trying to convey a 3D object in 2D it will make the object (or person) appear bigger.
This would be true if we lived 30 years ago. What you are talking about is the non-proffesional cameras we have at home. Those cameras add because they have wide screen lenses. This is why there are professional cameras too. Those cameras have more MPixels and better zooming. They also have better lenses , so they usually don’t add (unless there is too much zooming)and even sometimes make the person appear thinner!
Plus, a photo adds pounds when someone wears white dresses(which cast fewer shadows) or when the angle or the lighting is not good so the shadows “fall” on the person on an unflattering way. Photographers are usually professionals, so they make sure that the photo is taken correctly.
WORD! It was about time someone gave a really professional comment on the topic.
the camera still adds and not because of the actual camera or film or angle- it’s a lack of relative scale that makes people appear larger
Klara! i agree with u completely! dont get what people see in her AT ALL!
Yeah, her face is not attractive to me, either. I never liked her curvy figure, but now I will say her body looks great!
it’s because she’s been in a slew of roles playing the sexy character. And blonde hair softened her features. She wasn’t universally accepted as ‘beautiful’ when she first did Lost in Translation. But then she dyed her hair and played the hot woman in all these films, and suddenly everyone took notice.
Think about it–with makeup, lighting, and camera angles all perfectly tweaked to flatter her, and being projected onto a huge screen where you have no choice but to watch her, it’s impossible not to notice.
I agree with you that she’s not unattractive, but definitely not gorgeous.
Wow, she’s looking awfully thin lately. Not sure it suits her frame, after all she is known for her voluputous hourglass curves.
Still looks like an hourglass/curvy figured lady to me just a very slim one. But I agree that it doesn’t totally suit her, she looks like she’s supposed to be bigger because her head now looks too big for her body.
Come on ! She’s not thin !! She’s curvy, even too curvy I think but I don’t get it why people say she’s thin !! That’s not thin ! Jessica Stroup, that’s thin !
She still has her curves there is no denying that, but yes she is very thin for her particular body type. She’s not an ectomorph like Jessica Stroup, she’s an endormoprh so it looks more extreme for her than Jessica.
She’s thin for her body type. Scarlett and Jessica do not have similar body types. Not even close…
Blonde & curvy is her thing! She looks good though.
Aw no, I’m a bit gutted really. Whilst I don’t want her to maintain a particular body type/shape to keep people (read: me!) happy I also feel this goes against the image she’s created for herself. And whilst I think she is, was and always will be beautiful I can’t help feel that this is somewhat…unnecessary? x
i dont think she lost THAT much weight, because she was pretty tiny to begin with. if she’s 5′4, my guess is that she weighs around 110 or so. As for other celebrities, I imagine it’s pretty shocking to see how skinny they are in real life. the few celebrties that I have seen on the streets in NYC looked skeletal….
Wowzers. She looks amazing! And I agree with those of you who say the camera adds weight. How many people have you heard say they see these stars in real life and they are so much smaller than you thought! Hell, even Kelly Clarkson is supposedly not as whale-like as she looks!
The video camera adds weight ppl. And not even that, it’s not about adding weight, it’s about creating the impression that everything is bigger. It ads proportion. To everything, not just skinny stars. Not pictures. Not professional photos that are photoshoped. Stop confusing things.
And at video clips they make sure people look skinnier than they rally are. Oh, there are also new cameras(PROFFESIONAL and veeery expensive) that can add glow to your skin disappear some rinkles etc.
And I agree, video doesnt add weight;it makes people appear taller too, so they just appear bigger.
And I know what I’m talking about, because since I was a little kid, I’ve been reading about technology and cameras were my second favorite subject, right after robots. And I’ve had classes about cameras. I’m not a nerd or sth, I just happened to know many things about them.
What kind of mushrooms are you eating?
So funny that I forgot to laugh…
I’m not a nerd and I don’t like mushrooms, but thanks for asking.
Nerd? How that relates to this. I just meant that what you just said “there are also new cameras(PROFFESIONAL and veeery expensive) that can add glow to your skin disappear some rinkles etc.” sounds a bit too UFO stuff. There are no professional cameras that somehow automatically or magically TRANSFORM how people look. The way the picture is taken might be deceiving for eys, and photoshopping might do a lot of things, but latter one does not usually apply to these kind of “red carpet” photos.
Also about that “glow” you mentioned. In some tv series or movies you might see that, but that’s just an visual effect usually applied afterwards.
Actually, there are special lenses that haze the pic/video automatically. Thus, the pic/video doesn’t show all the rinkles. And there are lenses that make the colours brighter or the opposite, so they make your face glow(=make it look brighter). I don’t say that they magically disappear every flaw on your skin, but it does work.
And sorry for not understanding what you meant but I’m not English, so I thought it was an expression I didn’t know:(
“Actually, there are special lenses that haze the pic/video automatically. Thus, the pic/video doesn’t show all the rinkles. And there are lenses that make the colours brighter or the opposite, so they make your face glow(=make it look brighter). I don’t say that they magically disappear every flaw on your skin, but it does work.”
Possible with just different kind of aperture sizes and other settings. And about the “glow” again, if were are talking about the same thing, usually in tv series (less in movies, thank god because it looks so awful and unrealistic like video games, in general – not only people) it is just overexposured. But it’s not a wrinkle remover or anything.
“And sorry for not understanding what you meant but I’m not English, so I thought it was an expression I didn’t know:(”
I’m not English either :]
I’m not talking about tv series, but about tv shows.
In my country there was a show about a couple of years ago,and it was very funny, because the woman who was the newscaster had perfect skin on the camera that was only showing her and you could see when another camera was showing everyone including her(it was a program tht would host famous people), she looked WAY older, not bright at all and had a lot of wrinkles. This woman had admitted that they had ordered a very expensive camera (from Japan I think) for her.
This is an example of what meant. And as I’ve said before, I know what I’m talking about.
P.S.:I didn’t know you are not English, thats why I thought it was a new expression!
I still don’t believe there is some sort of turn-face-full-of-winkles-into-perfect-skin camera. The other camera had perfect studio lightning designed for that particular camera angle, unlike the other camera? Completed with some lense effects.
Of course the other camera wasn’t in the same angle and this is a reason why she looked better, but another reason was the lense of the camera. That’s what I mean. It’s not that the camera alone will disappear everything from your face! I told you that before.
I think this conversation got too long for no reason…
And at video clips they make sure people look skinnier than they rally are. Oh, there are also new cameras(PROFFESIONAL and veeery expensive) that can add glow to your skin disappear some rinkles etc.
And I agree, video doesnt add weight;it makes people appear taller too, so they just appear bigger.
sorry, i posted it twice!
Everyone should know she has been working out to look good in latex outfit (Iron Man 2 movie), but I hope this is not her future, permanent figure because some of the sex appeal is gone. But definitely not skinny, that’s totallly wrong word – but quite thin compared to how she sometimes used to look.
meh..I liked her blond better and I hate those granny shoes
I don’t usually like her, but in this particular pictures I think she looks pretty good and cute. And I hate that tattoo.
Still looks good, but not the curvy sexy one anymore
5′4″…. I’d say she is about 108… she looks great although she could pick better shoes for that dress….
I liked her when she was curvier!
Same here she had a great body and look, now she looks like everyone else in hollywood which isn’t a great thing IMO. Contrary to what some might believe it gets boring seeing the same look and shape on everyone!
Wow, her tattoo is really ugly.
She looks good though, but I preferred when she had a bit more curves and was blonde.
cant stand this woman. little miss “i love being curvy” “i never diet” but oops 15 lbs just fell off me… bullsh!t! plus her face just irritates me, she always looks so bloody smug. sorry, rant over.
Read this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scarlett-johansson/the-skinny_b_186233.html
ITA!
“ITA”?
ITA (forum talk for “I totally agree”) was my response to the commment blah wrote. (When I posted it your comment wasn’t there)
Ah…
And now I noticed you didn’t even reply to me.
I think she looks fabulous, seriously. But not the dark hair. I think she’s prettier as a blond.
But she has been working out a lot for her Iron Man role and I wouldn’t expect her to stay at this size. I would estimate that she looks to weigh about 115 lbs and has maybe dropped about 10 lbs.
Her head is sooooooooooo big…i don’t like her at all
not in this dress,not in another one.
Anyone know the designer of the dress? I like it.
Considering her husband is constantly ripped and running marathons, i’m surprised it took this long for her to feel the pressure. Being curvier did/does fit her and helps set her apart from the Hollywood standard, but she was looking REALLY soft in He’s Just Not That Into You…
her body is cute but it makes her head look so much bigger, too big.
Somehow I think she just doesn’t look attractive anymore this way. The tininess suits some ppl but it doesn’t suit her at all imo and looks just awkward (especially her face). The blonde hair was way prettier as well.
WOW! I think she looks amazing. I love this kind of figure, soft with some curves but so petite without being sinewy and gaunt.
IMO, best she’s looked in a long while.
I prefer the blonde in general, but the brunette is working for her here in terms on general look and dress.
I liked her a lot better curvier and blonde
I almost didn’t recognize her in this pic
wow I think she looks stunning
she looks perfect here! PERFECT!
I am not seeing what everyone else is seeing….she looks funny to me now…..some people look better curvy…her face looks too big for her body….her shape in that dress is close to a celery shape vs hourglass….i like her bigger than in that pic…she is pretty so that her features stand out when she is larger….some people have smaller features and you can only tell when they are thin and have no fat…
Her body is AMAZING. I like her heavier, I like her lighter. I would love to look that tiny and petite, yet not skinny by any means. If I lose weight, I may be smaller but also bonier, she just got smaller. But yeah, she doesn´t look that curvy anymore, her breasts are much smaller and she shoudn´t lose any more weight. And I don´t like that hair color, it does nothing for her. Blond and lighter brown (like when she first started darkening her hair) are fabulous, but not this reddish dark brown.
Oh, I love her.
she’s WAY smaller than the size we’re used to seeing her at, for sure – but with a figure like that, she looks great either way!
her curves translate well to a variety of sizes. Scarlett can do no wrong!
Black is slimming
She prob lost a little weight for her iron man 2 role because I’m pretty sure she’s wearing spandex in that…and the camera really does add 10lbs