Selena Gomez

Selena Gomez Models for Adidas

article-2359149-1ABCA8B4000005DC-116_634x856

article-2359149-1ABCA8E8000005DC-424_634x809 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas

20 year-old beauty Selena Gomez turned model as she starred in a new Adidas campaign, modeling leggings, leather jackets and daisy dukes from her own line.

See them all next!

 

article-2359149-1ABCA8B4000005DC-116_634x856 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA8B8000005DC-30_634x460 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA8C0000005DC-590_634x750 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA8C8000005DC-820_634x412 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA8CC000005DC-65_634x468 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA8D0000005DC-474_634x820 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA8D4000005DC-58_634x522 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas  article-2359149-1ABCA884000005DC-97_634x461 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas article-2359149-1ABCA889000005DC-624_634x469 - Selena Gomez Models for Adidas

Incoming search terms:

selena gomez leggings
Previous ArticleNext Article
  • Kate

    She’s cute, but what ever happened to actually gorgeous celebrities? Remember the 80’s when most of the actors had perfect bodies and bone structure and didn’t look like someone you’d see every day on the street? Do people just get jealous too easily nowadays so they want celebrities to look more attainable?

    • solaxia

      Yeah I agree, celebs these days usually aren’t that striking are they.

      I think Selena is cute, she looks so young. I think it’s a combination of her cutsey face, and also slim and small body that makes her look so youthful.

    • Candy M.

      Hmm, I agree that most if not all celebs today are average, but I don’t recall tons of 80s celebs being gorgeous. Now that you mentioned it though I’m going to think of the 80s celebs i found beautiful. I think Whitney Houston was really pretty when she started out. Grace Jones was beautiful and striking. Brooke Shields, the most beautiful girl i think I’ve seen, but she started out as a model. Bo Derek had a pretty face i thought. Oh, Michelle Pfiefer when I saw her in scarface. Kim basinger I guess too. Also,models had more fame like Cindy Crawford so I guess you’re right actually.

      • Kate

        Michelle Pfeiffer’s face is perfection. I wonder if she’d be as famous nowadays. It’s like now celebs have the most average bone structure ever. Miley Cyrus is just flat out unattractive yet she’s regarded as a “hot girl.” Megan Fox is one of the only actresses recently that I thought was really beautiful, but she messed her face up.

        Also, people were so jealous and hateful of her it’s probably why she felt like she needed to change her face. Sure she said dumb things, but so do a ton of people. People were just so jealous and said such horrible things that she probably lost it.

        Selena, she’s nothing. She’s not threatening. She’s not remarkable, so people support her because they see her as a relatable every day girl. There’s nothing wrong with that, but relatable doesn’t mean attractive. Yet the media is portraying it like it is.

        • anushka

          Taylor swift has height and a fairly average face in my opinion. She dosnt have smoldering looks and has an amazing makeup artist.
          http://l2.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/OaV7iwyYJn_BnmmrX_l6Sg–/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTMxMDtxPTg1O3NtPTE7dz0zMTA-/http://media.zenfs.com/289/2011/08/02/TaylorSwift_071645.jpg
          Her features dont strike me at all.
          Maybe I just dont understand her appeal.

        • lc

          I agree with your first comment. It does seem that way, these days. I completely see that. I don’t agree about the Megan Fox thing though; I didn’t then and I don’t currently find her beautiful. Never have. I will say that she is better looking than chipmunk-cheek Selena and Miley, though.

          • Candy M.

            Yeah, she(megan fox) was never a natalia vodianova or constance jablonski, but she did have a good bone structure. Still, when I look at her next to the models I just posted its clear who’s more beautiful.

          • lc

            Exactly! Those women blow her out of the water. The only she is better looking than imo are the Miley’s and Selena’s, and that doesn’t say much as they are just unattractive lol.

          • Kate

            Well, your opinion isn’t fact. Most people in this world find Megan to be stunning. However, Natalie Vodianova has a heavily masculinized face. I think she is beautiful but she is obviously more masculine than Megan. Her nose is also too wide for her lip width. Heavily masculinized brow, forehead, and hairline . Small yellow teeth, and a lanky figure that is not feminine. Megan doesn’t have obvious flaws in the same way Natalia does. Well, except for the thumb. Fake or not, she is aesthetically more pleasing to look at (especially in 2008/2009.)

          • Candy M.

            Kate- there is always androgyny in beauty. Look at the Nefertiti bust, considered the most beautiful women in egypt. Same even goes for men, the beautiful boys of classical athens had a mix of male and female( femininity is not the same as femaleness) features. Beautiful women very often have hard or male features, which is not the same as looking like a man. Brooke Shields, who used to be incredibly stunning, face has become too similar to a males as opposed to the androgynous face she had when younger. Linda Evangelista, very androgynous. Heck, even Cindy Crawford. Your argument is full of missteps, one of them saying her lanky figure isn’t feminine. Once again, difference between” feminine” and “female”. Femininity is a man made category, female is not. You could say her figure isn’t the typical females and id say you’re right, but look at Audrey Hepburn or Grace Kelly who I hear described as feminine more than anybody else. Your next misstep is to say my opinion isn’t a fact, but you go on to claim that other peoples, those who support Megan Fox being “more aesthetically pleasing”, opinions are facts. You even say “obvious flaws” suggesting that beauty is objective. Next misstep, you say most people find Megan Fox stunning. First of all, not true or provable. Even if everyone in your circle of friends think so, hardly representative of the entire world. Is there a statistic out there that shows the majority of people find Megan Fox stunning? Id love to see it if you could find it. Also, I really couldn’t care how many people say she’s beautiful- people say the same about Kelly Brook. Maybe she’s sexually attractive to men and women care more about that, maybe its because she’s very relatable to average people- but she’s hardly beautiful.

          • Candy M.

            Heck Kate, I even forget to point out the obvious. Megan Fox has male features! Her chin, cheeks, and forehead. She too has a mix of female and male features, so um….

          • Kate

            It’s true. Beauty is subjective. My opinion is going to be different from yours and that’s fine. I do think it’s pretty comical that you think people don’t find her attractive. Clearly, you were living under a rock for the past couple of years. Megan Fox is also not nearly as masculine as Natalie. Higher testosterone levels in women result in facial bone growth. Everything from her suborbital process to her mandible is much smoother. I’m not going to bore you with that numerous things to list, but Megan Fox isn’t nearly as masculine.

            Masculinity/androgyny doesn’t have to be seen as unattractive. I think it can be a cool, reinvented nuance of the 21 century. Evolutionary, though, it wouldn’t make sense for the majority of humans to find it attractive simply because it isn’t an indicator of reproductive success.

            I honestly don’t care what your opinion of Megan Fox is, but to say beauty is completely subjective is untrue. There is a science behind it.

          • serena

            Androgynous girls often look attractive when young. However, with age, their faces become masculine and hard. Brooke Shields is the perfect example: she was SO gorgeous when young but I was shocked to see how manly she looks now. Angelina Jolie is another one whose face is starting to look harsh, her jaw is square and she needs long hair to soften it. Natalia Vodianova is gorgeous but I suspect she will go the same way eventually. Megan Fox will age terribly as she’s addicted to surgery, fillers, procedures and has ruined her natural looks.

          • Mera

            “Masculinity/androgyny doesn’t have to be seen as unattractive. I think it can be a cool, reinvented nuance of the 21 century. Evolutionary, though, it wouldn’t make sense for the majority of humans to find it attractive simply because it isn’t an indicator of reproductive success.”

            And according to a recent study, the heavily feminine big wide set eyes childlike face ‘look’ is apparently not the kind of woman that men choose to marry. Just to have flings with. And that a slightly more masculinized face is preferred for a long term relationship/marriage.

          • Candy M.

            kate. you misunderstood what I was saying with your last reply- Ive gotten a lot of flack for suggesting beauty is mostly objective- so we agree there for sure and we agree in most places. We seem to agree mostly on beauty- so just clearing up any misunderstanding.

          • lc

            LOL and neither is yours. I find Megan DULL and of course PLASTIC. I don’t care if her face is “masculine”, that’s your opinion. I find her regal, unique, and stunning. Imo she is faaaar more beautiful than Megan. She is the model after all.

          • Mera

            Selena Gomez is ultra-feminine compared to Megan Fox.

        • Candy M.

          Yes, Mileys bone structure is just bad and her face is so bloated too. Her face isn’t just plain, its ugly.Celebs with good bone structure currently, theres about 2 of them. Angelina Jolie does, Megan Fox does(though i don’t find her features, surgery beautiful at all) I was going to say KStew but i find her pretty unremarkable still, oh Jessica Chastain too.

          Really though, I just can’t buy it that Selena Gomez ,or any celeb for that matter, is more beautiful than this.

          http://us.cdn001.fansshare.com/photos/constancejablonski/constance-jablonski-1747134542.jpg
          http://jacfans.tumblr.com/post/26503225524
          http://us.cdn001.fansshare.com/photos/fridagustavsson/louis-vuitton-spring-frida-gustavsson-48457299.jpg
          http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01755/vodianova_1755667c.jpg

        • Candy M.

          I mean yeah, just compare the two.

          http://us.cdn001.fansshare.com/photos/constancejablonski/constance-jablonski-1747134542.jpg
          http://www.bubblews.com/assets/images/news/1589384296_1363219842.jpg

          Call me crazy, but theres a very distinct difference difference between the average one and the stunning one. Guess who?

          • Mera

            That’s not fair.

            The photo of JL is horrible compared to CJ.

            IMO, JL is quite stunning here:

            http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-500hFX0uFDo/T6Q0kDJBTVI/AAAAAAAAEEc/99fbUioRvIo/s650/Jennifer-Lawrence-Gioia-Italy-May-+2012-00.jpg

            and here:

            http://www.heightandweightofcelebs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Header5.jpg

            PS I am not a JL fan, actually. But, the photos used for comparison should at least be of equal quality 😛

          • Candy M.

            Even then, huge difference.

          • anon

            “And according to a recent study, the heavily feminine big wide set eyes childlike face ‘look’ is apparently not the kind of woman that men choose to marry”

            Another old wives tale/cliche that come from the same group of women who also insist that men only like women with “curves” And JL is a very plain looking girl, not a good example. Neither is Megan Fox who has had too much plastic surgery. It makes me laugh how so many women on this site, like to tell everyone what men want, comments obviously made to feed your own ego and make yourself feel better. Yeah look around at ll the married men in the word, they all chose to marry the same/one kind of person. This comment is laughable.
            and stems from your own insecurity.

            As for Selena I think she’s really cute.

          • Mera

            @anon

            Don’t make assumptions, you make an ass of yourself.

            The findings come from this study:

            http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130620214010.htm

            and this one:

            http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130620214010.htm

            “For the female faces, masculinization also lent the women a look of comparatively high dominance and low warmth and trustworthiness, while the feminized faces ranked high in all aspects of sweetness and light. When it came to picking out the aspect of a potentially good mother, though, appraisers preferred the average female face to that of a feminized face.

            This quirky result raises the question of what, from an evolutionary perspective, a man is choosing if he designates as highly attractive an ultra-feminized face that he does not necessarily think belongs to a woman capable of rearing his brood.”

            Personally, I believe that all the talk of symmetry, WHR and the ‘golden ratio’ is nothing but bunk. Symmetry and ultra-feminine or ultra-masculine looks do not necessarily mean superior genes – and that is what I have been arguing against.

            A person can have symmetrical features and be ugly + unhealthy whereas someone else can have one eyebrow lower than the other and be extremely healthy and live a long life.

            Also, many of the models used do not apply to many of the cultures around the world. Just look at all of the variation in body shape in Africa – or the aborigines in Australia. They would all fail the euro-centric idea of perfect beauty with the victorian wasp waist and delicate features with perfect alabaster skin!

          • Mera

            And here:

            http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12043/abstract

            Draw your own conclusions.

            Main point being, and I will repeat it: ultra-feminine or ultra-masculine + perfect symmetry is not proof of superior genes. Period.

      • serena

        You must take into account that a lot of the “it” girls became famous as children – Selena, Miley, Demi, etc. So Selena Gomez was chosen to be famous at age 4 in Barney & Friends, who knew if she would grow up to be pretty or not? It’s not fair to compare to actresses who don’t become famous until adulthood.

        Also it makes NO sense that actresses should all be hot, because they play a variety of characters. You need avg looking women like Tina Fey for example to play average women on TV. It would be ridiculous if every woman on a TV show was hot. Same with singers – yeah looks factor in but it should be about talent. Models are a different story since they’re walking hangers with no talent needed.

        • Kate

          I completely agree, but it’s weird that the media pushes people like Selena and Miley as the hot girls of the moment. And I think Tina Fey is actually pretty haha!

    • kia

      I WANT TO BE AVERAGE!!!!
      apart from that, I think you are referring to 80s because maybe you grew up then and you were impressed by beauty for the first time. I think actual public beauties are various but great,there are a lot of stunning faces and bodies. i don’t find brooke shields(Young version) so gorgeous and I think selena Gomez is a lot more beautiful. maybe they are simply different types and you are more enchanted by the ones who less resembles yourself or your friends and who gives you a “new” vibe. don’t call jealousy because it is a ridiculous argument, even if jealousy is everywere,a natural human reaction that mature people deal with in a pacific and honest way.

      • Kate

        Sorry hun I was born in the 90’s and I’ve studied human facial structure for years now. I’m an anthropology major and have read many books and articles on facial attractiveness and other factors that contrible. I, personally, think young Brooke Shields absolutely blows Selena out of the water. Like you said, maybe you’re only enchanted by people that look like you like Selena probably does.

        And why would you want to be average? I’d much rather stand out.

        • Mera

          Argument from authority isn’t an argument.

          • serena

            Being a college kid doesn’t equate to authority. As an anthro major I’m sure you’d realize different cultures have different beauty standards, though there are objective criteria as well (e.g clear skin, symmetry of features, etc…). For example I’ve heard East Asian people make negative comments on western celebrities who are considered attractive here because they’re turned off by angular features. When I studied in Ghana I quickly realized that there is a huge difference in beauty standards there although they’ve been colonized and exposed to white people for centuries.

            Personally I thought young Brooke Shields was gorgeous too. But I was shocked to see how masculine her face has become, literally scary on a billboard I saw recently. Selena has softer features that will age better. I’d rather look like an ‘average’ girl than a haggard man.

          • Kate

            There is a science to attractiveness. It can also be subjective and that is totally fine. All I am saying is that this is something I have studied for a long time. While that doesn’t give me authority, I do feel that I’m well versed. No one’s opinion is wrong, there are just certain facial measurements that come closer to the “golden” ratio of 1:1.618. Also, there are also plenty evolutionary factors such has high cheekbones or broad shoulders in men that instinctively appeal to us. Cultures will have different tastes, but you will see that the people regarded as “most attractive” will all have close to the same facial ratios both men and women.

          • Mera

            The golden ratio theory has been thoroughly debunked.

            And I have studied the science too, and guess what, the faces in the ‘middle’, in regards to androgyny, tend to be viewed as the most attractive.

            That’s right. It works for men and women. Overly feminine is not necessarily viewed as ‘most genetically fit’ just as ‘overly masculine’ is not viewed as ‘most genetically fit’.

            The truth lies somewhere in the middle.

          • Kate

            It hasn’t been debunked. You can’t “debunk” a number lol. It as has to do with equal proportions Plastic surgeons still use it as reference. It’s about symmetry and proportion.

            I don’t know where you are getting your information, but just about every study I have ever come across, men and women alike found the feminized face most in women attractive.

          • Mera

            The idea that the golden ratio is the most perfect number and is behind the most beautiful faces and bodies IS A MYTH.

            It has been debunked extensively by mathematicians, and your statement ‘you can’t debunk a number’ just shows your ignorance.

            You are nothing more than a pseudo-intellectual who has taken a few courses in college and now thinks she is some sort of expert on all matters related to beauty.

            There is nothing mystical or special about the ‘golden ratio’.

            Also, there are reasons why ultra-masculine is not preferred, just as ultra-feminine is not preferred. The truth lies somewhere in the middle as I stated earlier. The most beautiful faces can go either way – boy or girl. They tend to be right smack dab in the middle.

            Ultra-masculine, for example, is not preferred simply because the traits associated with hyper masculinity do not translate well if what a woman needs is a man who will be nurturing to his family.

          • Kate

            Ignorance? The irony haha. I never once said it was the only contributing factor to every aspect of attractiveness. Though, it does hold true because it is athletically pleasing and most attractive people fit the golden ratio.

            You seem sensitive about this. I’m not trying to tell people what is attractive or not I’m just sharing what I’ve gathered. Look at just about any study about female facial attractiveness and you will find that the more feminine face is greatly preferred. I would love to see the source of the study that says otherwise. My guess is you probably have masculine features, and this hits close to home. Don’t worry. I’m sure your mom thinks your pretty.

          • Candy M.

            Actually Kate, a study showed that most people did NOT pick the most feminized face, they picked a few tiers up. However, there needs to be a distinction from sexual attractiveness- what men want for reproducing and aesthetics. Yes, there is a difference. Even when you ask men, theres a forum where the person asked who’s the most beautiful woman in the world, they made distinctions between “sex appeal” and “beauty”. Most the men chose two women, who funnily enough, I mentioned up above when making the distinction- audrey hepburn and grace kelly. Other choices included Jennifer Connely, Christy Turlington, ava gardner, nefertiti bust, sofia loren, charlotte rampling. Hmm- there seems to be a common trait(s) amongst all of them. Starting with the nefertiti again- she looks like an alien, her beauties almost isolating and cold, I’ve heard people say they were scared, and like models she’s been described as looking like an alien. ” The Queen is an android, a manufactured being. She is paralyzed and paralyzing. THIS PORTRAIT SHOWS NEFERTITI HIS QUEEN AS HALF MASCULINE.”
            “Egypt invented egelgance, which is reduction,simplification, condensation. Mother nature is addition and multiplication, but Nefertiti is subtraction, her sleek contoured face one step from the wizened. One can never be too rich or too thin, decreef the Duchess of Windsor. I said the idea of beauty is based of enormous exclusions. So much is excluded from the Nefertiti bustle we can feel its silhouette straining against the charged atmosphere. Nefertiti is ritualized western personality, a streamlined thing. Her eyebrows are shaved and redrawn with MALE WIDTH AND FROWN. She has the face of a mannequin, static, posed, self proffering. Her knowingness is both hieratic and fashionable. The modern mannequin OR RUNWAY MODEL is an ANDROGYNE, she is femaleness impersonalized by masculine abstraction.”

            The quote above says it all really.

        • georgi

          “Sorry hun”? Can you be any more patronizing?

          • Mera

            I’ve taken some college courses and read some books therefore I know more than you.

            What people such as kate don’t realize is that just because your well versed in a subject doesn’t make you the one and only word on that subject. And it certainly doesn’t make you right about everything.

            It’s the ‘argument from authority fallacy’:

            “he basic structure of such arguments is as follows: Professor X believes A, Professor X speaks from authority, therefore A is true. Often this argument is implied by emphasizing the many years of experience, or the formal degrees held by the individual making a specific claim. The converse of this argument is sometimes used, that someone does not possess authority, and therefore their claims must be false”

          • MerryHappy

            I know!
            I was like… Face palm.
            I’m a college student with a major too, but not an authority on anything haha.
            Rule 1 of post responding: never, ever hun or sweetie someone you disagree with, it always comes off as a rude attempt to marginalize an existing opinion.

          • Kate

            Lol oh please. I’m not trying to tell people what to find attractive. You all are being ridiculous. I was sharing what I’ve learned by reading multiple books, scholarly articles, and, yes, college courses. It doesn’t give me authority, but I do know a lot about this. I don’t think it’s anything to be chastised about.

        • SA girl

          I agree with you once again. Brooke Shields was incredibly stunning. Selena is “cute” pretty, not breathtakingly beautiful.

          • Candy M.

            Yes, like I said, when she was young she was simply androgynous- most people wouldn’t even realize it. As she’s aged though her male features have become more and more apparent to the point where they’ve overshadowed the female features. She’s crossed the line into looking too much like a man. I know ill get flack for this too, even though its obvious, but beauty is at its peak during youth. Everyone aims to feel more youthful and look more youthful. Me personally Id rather be stunning in my youth like Brooke and look off when older then maybe look average when young and average when older, if I’m making sense.

        • Mera

          I am sensitive to your patronizing attitude, that’s what.

          I find it rather irritating when ignorant blowhards use the argument from authority fallacy and then talk down to others based on that.

          And implying that because I disagree with you that I must look masculine? Oh, that’s brilliant. Really! And it is the second fallacy you have committed today, sweetie! Ad hominem fallacy: Attacking your opponent’s character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.

          Yes, of course, my arguments must have no merit because Kate is 1) an authority on beauty 2) anyone who disagrees with her looks like a man

          Thanks for lulz, sweetcheeks.

          • Kate

            You’re really hypocritical. Assuming I think I’m the authority and calling me a pseudo intellectual when you have yet to say one accurate thing. Stating things as facts when they are your opinions. There is obviously something that is sensitive to you about this. It was just an obvious guess that you’re up in arms because it most likely relates to you, no?

            And how about that source?

          • Kate

            I’ve also seen your other comments on this and you obviously like to pick fights and be negative. So I’m bored with this and don’t feel like entertaining you anymore.

          • lc

            Mera, you seem incredibly well-informed and very knowledgeable. I read all of your comments, and they seem very intelligent and make a lot of sense. And I agree on every point you had on beauty/looks, Candy M.

          • Kate

            Lmfao, Ic, you are the other one I see always arguing on here. Huh, no wonder you agree with her.

          • lc

            Lol, I rarely argue. And that has nothing to do with why I agree with her anyway. She makes sense.

        • Candy M.

          Wow Kate, I fully agree with this. I don’t know, the only part i disagree with you about is that ultra female faces are the most beautiful. I mean even you said Brooke was stunning. But anyways, were thinking on the same wavelength.

      • Candy M.

        First if all, i wasn’t even a kid in the 80s. Second, you want to be average? That says it all.

      • Candy M.

        Also, Selena more beautiful than this?

        http://www.lifestyled.com.au/beauty/beauty-how-to-brows-with-zoe-foster/

        http://beautiful-pics.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Brooke-Shields-4.jpg

        I mean you pretty much just proved what I’ve ben saying this entire time with your post, you find selene relatable and saying she’s beautiful makes you feel better about yourself. Correct me if I’m wrong, but you pretty much admitted that she’s average and thats why you like her. And apparently I was crazy for thinking this. I don’t know if you realize it, but you pretty much proved our point.

    • SA girl

      I totally agree about 80s celebs and models…tends to give away our age too (lol, 32 years).For me, the best looking supermodels thus far, had to be Elle Mcpherson, Cindy Crawford, and Claudia Schiffer.. For all the younger ladies posting comments on this site, please google these women when they were younger. You will then understand how beautiful they were, from their height, facial structure, body built, and glowy complexions. For the ladies admiring Michelle Pfeiffer, I agree as well…a really beautiful lady (has Eastern European facial features). Please note, I am not downgrading any of our present supermodels/celebrities, they are really beautiful too, but the women mentioned above were really unique, and outstanding from the crowd.

      • Tanya

        Claudia Schiffer has the face of a skeleton. Models in general are too tall and look very lanky when you see them in real life. But they do look good on runways though. Height is also rather a masculine trait and the majority of men find women between 1.60 m to 1.70 m most appealing.

        • Candy M.

          “Height is also rather a masculine trait and the majority of men find women between 1.60 m to 1.70 m most appealing.”

          Do i even need to say anything?

      • Candy M.

        I think there was maybe more of an emphasis on glamour in the past, so yeah i do think some actresses in the past were beautiful. Audrey Hepburn, Grace kelly, Catherine Deneuve, Ava gardner- there are a few beauties from then actually at lead facially. From what I’ve read Hollywood actresses were groomed from a young age and often times they actually were chosen for their face( i read that in a vas biography) than their talent. If I remember correctly Ava had never acted in her life, somebody just liked her face. Of course they had their fair share of plain janes too like everyones favorite Marilyn Monore- who without the hair an everything looked average( plenty of people who met her have said it like Joan Collins). I do see a lot of pretty faces while watching old movies though.

    • energydrink

      The 80’s were all about coke, hideous fashion, terrible music, and extreme androgyny in Hollywood.

      I personally like that these days, there really is variety.. from petite to tall, small to large framed, small to big bust/butt, athletic figure, slim figure, curvy figure, full figured, etc. with all types of coloring and ages.

      There are those who have classical (some might say conventional/average/boring) features, and many who have exotic ones (these would be unusual, not conventionally beautiful, etc). While there is still a long way to go to truly embrace all types of beauty(because all types have the ones who make the most of it and the ones who don’t), its much better than the force-fed 90’s plastic fantastic or 80’s full on androgyny fashions imo.

      On topic, Selena is cute, her baby face will bring her lots of joy when she is older (her Mother also looks very young, lucky lady). Usually in candids her legs seem longer/thinner though, she looks much shorter here than usual.

      • Kate

        Haha, I don’t care what others opinions on beauty are but don’t knock the 80’s. Michelle Pfeiffer in Scarface is my obsession. I couldn’t have dreampt up someone more perfect. The supermodels back then were amazing.

        These days it’s all about auto tune and everyone thinking they are the center of the universe due to social media.

    • dee

      Well that’s the problem right there…you state opinions about Selena’s looks but she is not a fashion model she is an actress. She got into the business to do films, not have pictures taken of her bone structure. You don’t to be perfect looking to act. You want to pick apart and criticize faces then go look at a fashion magazine. Selena Gomez and other “attainable” celebrities are in the industry for the love of doing films and are not there to market their looks. Sheesh.

  • PS

    She’s looking alright, but she has changed so much and I can’t seem to see her appeal at all. I guess it’s that weird transition from no longer a child star but not yet really a mature one either.

  • Ash

    She oozes with exuberance and youthful radiance. Looks more like a 16-17 year old woman rather than someone who is in her early twenties.

  • SA girl

    In her age group, Taylor Swift is extremely beautiful (statuesque and blonde), and not common in appearance like Selena. She is pretty average in appearance, not gorgeous model-like. However, that actually doesn’t matter, as it’s her singing career that makes her popular (bringing in all those dollar bills, who cares if you are not super gorgeous, right?). With reference to Taylor Swift, I think it’s both, a real winner!

    • PinkLadi

      Meh, imo taylor swift is not particularly stunning in appearance.

      Her height is only above average so far as she is literally quite a bit taller than the average woman, however, I don’t consider that to be automatically or necessarily a positive attribute, and I’m tall myself.

      Either way, I don’t see the point of saying there are too many average looking “stars”…these aren’t supermodels, and both Taylor and Selena started their careers as minors. Maybe some people would rather their fans kick them to the curb if they don’t mature to our liking?

    • Isabel

      While I do agree that Tayor pretty body and face wise, I also believe that to be gorgeous it is necessary to be marketed that way. While Taylor has a unique looking face, she also has that good girl next door image that makes it hard fo her to be seen like something else. E world is about what you sell, and not as much about what you already have, reason why many ordinary looking celebs are considered the epitome of beauty.

    • Candy M.

      I think taylors fairly above average, but her face is still kind of average pretty girl, even though I think she is getting better looking. I remember her in a bikini on this site and she looked really skinny fat,maybe its better now. Prettier than most current celebs though, especially this current crop of disney stars- miley cyrus, demi lovato, selena gomez, vanessa hudgens etc.

      • serena

        The girls you named – Selena, Demi, Miley, Vanessa – are child stars. If a girl is chosen to be famous at age 5 then who knows if she will grow up pretty or not? Doesn’t matter because they girls have a ton of child/teen fans who will continually to support them. Marketing is more important than looks. Plus all these girls are singers and their albums are popular.

        • Candy M.

          I agree, I’m not arguing that.

    • Nana

      Taylor Swift is not that beautiful. Most people I know think she’s lanky and lack-luster.

    • Daniella

      HAHAHAHA Taylor Swift? Are you for real? I see girl 10 times prettier than her everyday where I live

      • wonderwoman21

        Lol taylor swift looks like a beady eyed weasel in a wig.

        • Winnie

          *THUD*

          i’m dying of laughter lmfao

        • lc

          I’m dying right there with you!!!! LOL that was spot on!

  • Ash

    Reposting again as the older post has some fundamental Grammatical errors. She oozes exuberance and youthful radiance. Looks more like a 16-17 year old teen rather than a young woman who is in her early twenties.

  • sofie kittie

    Doesn’t look like adidas clothing

  • sofie kittie

    I remember watching her on Wizards of Waverley Place on the Disney Channel… she was so funny, energetic and charming that I was pretty sure she would get alot of acting offers when she got older. It kind of surprises me that she decided to become a generic, over auto-tuned pop “star”

    • anushka

      I remember watching an interview of hers years back in which she clearly said ” Singing is not for me. I cant sing “- It was definitely something along those lines.

      • lc

        Well she was right. She CAN’T sing, at ALL.

        Ughh she better be grateful for studio recording and auto-tune because her “singing” “voice” is AWFUL. She is just a puppet for Disney, though, and they (and the hoards of tone-deaf pre-teens that listen to her) don’t care if she can.

  • Isabel

    People hate her looks right now because she seems too childish, but I’m sure that in some years, some of us are going to be very jealous, ha

    • Nana

      In a few years she’s going to be irreverent and there will be another “Selena Gomez” in her place. That’s just how it works.

      • Nana

        And while she’ll look younger for most of her life, it won’t hide the face that her nose is far to wide for her face and her eyes are too close together.

        • Mera

          I don’t think it’s possible to have a wide nose and close-set eyes.

          Wide nose usually implies wide set eyes. And from what I see, SG’s eyes are very fat apart.

          • Mera

            *far not fat

          • Nana

            So are you blind? Her eyes are really close together and her nose is wide at the bottom. I know a lot of people with eyes close together with wide noses. What are you talking about?

          • Mera

            Anne Coulter’s eyes are close together.

            SG’s, not so much.

            She has a wide face, in fact.

            Her eyes probably look close together because they are on the small side, and are surrounded by chubby cheeks and eye fat.

            But if you look at her facial structure she has a small chin and a wide midface.

          • serena

            Having a wide nose is not an inherent flaw – the nose has to be in proportion to the face. For example a lot of asian people tend to have broad faces with wide short noses whereas white people tend to have narrower faces with thinner (but taller/longer) noses. Just an observation, I know this doesn’t apply to everyone. Selena’s nose is wide but her face is rounded so it looks ok imo. A narrow ski-slope nose doesn’t look natural on everyone.

          • Mera

            She’s not in my top list of beauties but I think she’s cute.

            I never did like wide noses but over time they have grown on me.

            It can work on the right face!

          • energydrink

            Interesting link:

            http://www.thatsmyface.com/component/option,com_faceviewer/fuid,0/id,90528/lang,en/rsource,addthis/task,view_job/

            According to this her eyes are completely average (neither too close or too far), however her nostrils are wide. 🙂 Her face shape/skin age is also estimated to be young (12-14 years) which is usually what people guess for her, so this seems to be spot on 😀 It does also write that she looks androgynous, probably due to the chin?

          • Candy M.

            Hey Serena, thanks for saying a wide nose isn’t an inherit flaw like someone below criticizing constance seems to think. Its about proportion and how everything fits together, not oh she has small lips or a big nose.

  • anushka

    Not fond of the makeup. The lipstick looks like it spilled upwards on her upper lip.

    Nothing great about this shoot.

  • Hh

    She’s very pretty aside from her nose. It’s so distracting bc everything else on her is great. But her nose is not attractive IMO. And whoever said Taylor swift was stunning. To each their own indeed! Bc I actually honestly think she’s very unattractive.

    • Tanya

      Are you serious?! Her nose looks so cute and fits her face perfectly.

  • Candy M.

    She looks like a bunch of girls I knew back in middle school. She’s not going to age well at all.

  • KC

    I, personally, find her adorable. With her baby face, I don’t think she’ll be considered sexy (asides from young male teens) for a long time. I feel her pain, I’m 28 and still have a face of a 15 year old and am not really considered as anything other than “cute” by the majority of adults.

  • lc

    Lame shoot; she can’t model. Don’t find this girl pretty or attractive, and whatever talent she is supposed to have for being famous escapes me.

    • Candy M.

      Im sorry, but I just can’t buy that anyone would really think Selena or Jlaw is better looking than the models I posted.
      Jennifer Lawrence, Constance Jablosnki, Jennifer Lawrence, Constance Jablonski. I mean, just look at the photos above, does anybody really view jennifer lawrence as more beautiful? I just don’t believe it, i keep looking at the contrast. I even remember a post on this site with Selena Gomez at the peoples choice awards, karlie kloss’s face was in the background and the difference is just amazing.

      • Mishael

        Hmm… Although I find Constance prettier than Jennifer Lawrence, I don’t think she is sooo beautiful. And imo I would rather have Selena’s face and body than those of Karlie Kloss. She is a good and talented model, I guess. But she has very little sex appeal, if you ask me.

      • Mishael

        Tastes are different. It’s hard to believe that someone you consider beautiful and stunning is average or even unattractive for others. Still it’s a fact.

        • anon

          Constance jablonski is hardly an example of beauty that I would use. Her eyes are too far apart, her nose is too fat, her lips are too thin & wide, her jaw is too wide & her chin looks strangely big in some pics. In fact, I find her pretty unattractive. There are much prettier models & actresses than that one.

          • Candy M.

            Im sorry but their isn’t one actress as beautiful as Constance Jablonski. The pictures haven’t posted yet as the comment in still in moderation, but the difference between jennifer lawrence who is always hyped as so beautiful and Constance is just amazing. I honestly don’t believe anyone who says jennifer looks better, call me crazy.
            First of all Constance’s lips are hardly thinner than average, her nose may be a little fat(hardly), but what does that makes selenas? Wide jaw? You’re really just nitpicking things that can’t even be considered flaws. I mean even Cherly Tiegs, the individual features don’t matter as much as the proportions and how everything goes together. Lip size or eye color can’t be described as flaws.

          • Candy M.

            there isn’t

          • anon

            Again, that is your opinion that Constance is beautiful, mine is that she is not.
            And I never said Selena & Jennifer were beautiful. In fact, I never even mentioned them.
            Now, why is it that the flaws that YOU point out are truly flaws, yet flaws that other people point out are just nitpicking & not really flaws? If anyone is guilty of nitpicking, it is surely you.
            Again, sorry, but you are not the authority on what is beautiful & what isn’t. It doesn’t really matter who agrees with you. IT IS ALL OPINION.
            By the way, Constance is no Cheryl Tiegs. Cheryl was actually pretty, despite her thin lips, because she had other attractive features. Constance is not, I can’t really find anything about her face pretty. It looks like her face was stretched out width wise.

          • Candy M.

            Oh anon, I don’t even know what to say. Still going on about how its all opinion. Constance is obviously beautiful and you’re getting desperate. The picture I posted. you’re going to tell me thats not beautiful? Sure, I really believe that.

        • Candy M.

          same old, same old.

          • anon

            Oh Candy, still going on and on how you’re right and everyone who disagrees with you in wrong. I don’t really know much else to say. Constance is obviously not beautiful and you have try to “explain” away why people think the way they do. Yet, when YOU think, it is fact. You have spoken. Saying beauty is an opinion is desperate? How ridiculous…are YOU getting desperate? Perhaps you should try to get yourself named THE AUTHORITY ON BEAUTY IN AMERICA. Or better yet, the WORLD’s AUTHORITY.
            Reading your posts are always amusing, I’ll give you that.
            Oh, BTW, no, I do not find that beautiful & it doesn’t particularly matter whether you believe it or not. Unlike you, I won’t be losing sleep over this.

          • Sheza

            Well really everyone’s opinion is different. I think Constance is unique looking but she’s not my cup of tea.

      • serena

        Constance Jablonski is beautiful and does a great job pushing overpriced face serums. But Jennifer Lawrence is a great actress with an Oscar at 22, and her bubbly funny personality makes people laugh and genuinely enjoy watching her. We focus on looks so much on this blog but we forget these actresses/singers are ultimately hired to entertain, not to look pretty. Models don’t entertain, they are merely vessels to show off artistry and the designer’s talent (or sell goods like Constance and Estee Lauder). I think Constance is gorgeous but you could not pay me to watch her for hours.

        • Candy M.

          I know that Serena, and Ive said it before. Thats why actresses aren’t as beautiful as models, its not their job. Im just pointing out how they’re marketed as beautiful when they aren’t by magazines, the media, their pr agents.

          • serena

            True, their agents/managers try to push them being more attractive so as to get more roles and money. Thus those ridiculous 50 Most Beautiful lists the magazines do each year. Also because actresses make so much money we expect them to be attractive – or at least very well groomed and dressed. That’s why people criticize Kristen Stewart, because she has millions but chooses to look sloppy and unkempt.

          • Candy M.

            And the ironic part is that I consider Kristen to have one of th abetter faces in Hollywood, maybe thats why she doesnt try so hard? But yeah, i didn’t realize how many people agree with me on this site.

        • lc

          True serena, but the media sure would like for us to think she is beautiful. They are always pushing mediocre/unattractive actresses on us to think that they are “stunning”, J.Law being a good example.

          • anon

            The same can be said of many models. Models that are facially unattractive & plain. We are told they are beautiful, so many people start to believe it because they feel they should. Anyway, they are clothes hangers, they have the figures & heights & a certain look, not really the most attractive features, because it will distract from the clothes. It happens on both sides, not just actresses. I bet if some of these models some of you people gush over were actresses instead, you would have the same criticisms- average looking, nothing special, ugly, blah, blah, blah. It’s called brainwashing.

          • Mera

            @anon

            I never thought David Duchovny or his costar from the x-files were all that good looking until I spent a good year hearing, from every media outlet, how devastatingly sexy both were.

            After all of the ‘priming’ I softened a bit and agreed, yeah, they are attractive people.

            But, iniitially, and without all the hype, I didn’t think much of either.

          • Candy M.

            Um, the huge difference being that models are chosen for their beauty. I mean come on, this is just stupid. If one of those models were an actress I would think she’s beautiful, just look at the side by sides. Their bone structures are so much better and its so obvious. The girl above saying “I want to be average” so she likes Selena Gomez and not Brooke Shields. Just, you didn’t make a single good point- not interested.

          • Mera

            Commercial girls are chosen for their beauty and outgoing personalities.

            Otherwise, girls are chosen because they are a good blank canvas for photography.

          • anon

            Runway models are chosen for their bodies-tall & skinny, not because they are “stunning”. Having a certain look doesn’t necessarily mean beauty. Sure, some are very attractive, some are not.
            It’s amazing how much some people are bothered by other people’s opinions. Talk about insecurity.
            And yes, some models would be criticized if they were actresses & vice versa-some actresses would be gushed over if they were models. Try to convince yourself & everyone else otherwise all you want.

          • serena

            Anon, I agree with you. The fashion models we discuss on this site are usually commercial ones so it makes sense they’re chosen for beauty – they appeal to the public to sell products. However many runway models are plain. Lindsey Wixson for one, I can’t see what people like about her! There are many beautiful actresses who lack the height to be models but are prettier – Amanda Seyfriend is my personal favorite.

          • lc

            Candy M. is right. The HUGE difference is that models are chosen because they are beautiful or unique, or else they wouldn’t be models. Many actresses are not because they don’t necessarily have to be, yet the media WANTS us to think they are.

            And no, the media does not try to push any obscure, haute couture, elite, HF runway models on the public to think they are beautiful. I could name about ten I TRULY find beautiful (because I love models due to my own tastes and thinking, NOT brainwashing), and you and many others her would probably not even know who they were, would have never even heard of them. Female AND male, as a matter of fact. The only ones the media pushes in people’s faces are the more well known ones, and that is because they model for well known brands and most people *do* find them beautiful, such as Adriana Lima for Victoria’s Secret. So no, I don’t think that is true.

          • Mera

            Lindsey Wixson is actually kind of plain…until you get to her mouth + dimples.

            That’s what makes her unique. Almost freakish. And why she is awesome on the runway.

            Take away the mouth and she looks like a boring teenager.

          • lc

            That was @ anon. I am not trying to be rude or pushy, or state my opinion as a fact, but I just don’t exactly see what you’re saying about models and the media/public to be true. Again, much if not most if not all of the public do not even know half to a third of the names of HF, haute couture models, many whom I adore for their looks.

          • serena

            @Mera Lindsey Wixon is a perfect example of how ‘unique’ does not always translate to beautiful. Her big mouth is always open revealing her gap teeth, plus big floppy ears and cross eyes, I half-expect to see drool gushing out. She reminds me of “Dopey” from from Snow White. Cara Delavigne is another whose hype I can’t understand. Truth is if many of these fashion models were not tall, and if they became actresses instead, people would say ‘nothing special’ or even ‘ugly’. When I googled Lindsey Wixson one of the first suggestions was “is ugly” so I can’t be alone in my thinking! So many better models out there.

          • Mera

            I agree with you regarding Cara Delavigne. I really do not understand her appeal! I find her kind of pasty and boring, tbh.

    • Candy M.
      • lc

        Wow I can’t get over how fat Selena’s face is. Karlie looks stunning.

        • serena

          Well I’m not a big fan of Karlie but her facial structure is so much better than Selena’s. What’s odd is Selena is not chubby, but her face is fat as you said. Always looks bloated with chubby cheeks. Miley and JLaw also kind of have bloated puffy faces though neither girl is fat. What an odd coincidence.

          • Candy M.

            She’s known to eat fast food a lot, maybe its the sodium. But yeah, even if somebody finds Karlies individual features not ideal which is perfectly understandable, there is a reason she’s a model- next to selena the difference of bone structure is just so obvious.

  • Andi

    i love selena but this is seriously the most average shoot i have ever seen.

  • Winnie

    her two inverted looking front teeth really bother me

  • lexy

    she’s very young and pretty, nothing to criticize here.

  • Sheri

    I think she is really pretty but i don’t like this shoot at all, The clothes don’t look good together and if it didn’t say so in the title, i probably wouldn’t have known it was a shoot for Adidas – It looks so average.

  • MerryHappy

    The only thing that annoys me is how hard they tried to make her look like an artist, with sketches she’s supposedly done, half finished works, just ‘kickin it in her studio’… Doesn’t work.

  • tequilla

    she is so cute, its adorable.

  • Candy M.

    “think it can be a cool, reinvented nuance of the 21 century. ” or ancient egypt

  • Bellerina

    Oh. I thought it was one of the 1/2 Kardashians. Looks like a fun shoot.

  • Sophie

    One of the celebrities I am truly envious of. I love her whole look (not so much in this shoot though). But I may be biased, as I have similar facial features and round face (i’ve heard people like faces that look a bit like theirs) and have been told I look like her.

  • siennagold

    She’s cute with a nice body but not my type of beauty.

  • Mew

    Nice. The first picture looks like she hit her toe and is screaming in pain. That or she really wants a lollipop at grocery store and has thrown herself on the floor to scream until her parents buy her one.

  • Annie

    Maybe I’m just bitter because I got bullied for being too skinny as a teen and at 31 I’m still exactly the same weight and still waiting for this magical “filling out” business… but I think miss Selina is really chunking up and getting plump and looking super average. I reckon she looked better a couple of years ago. Yeah, maybe I’m just jealous though.

  • Hayley

    Holy cow you people sure are superficial. Beauty is subjective. The reason why people of different cultures or decades perceive beauty so differently is exactly that – a matter of Perception. We’ve all been programmed to see certain things as beautiful (most often hyped by the media). Heck, the guys I found attractive when I was younger, I found utterly grotesque now (not because they aged, I’m only 20). That just shows that perception changes overtime – there is no right or wrong answer. Stop trying to make science out of something that isn’t particularly scientific, that’s just coming off as plain superficial! Why can’t we just appreciate Selena’s pictures as they are and share some of our opinions. Instead of trying to submit your opinions as facts & reject everybody else’s? Geez!! Take a chill pill

  • ayu

    Pretty boring. Weird compositions, nothing really original. Would look better if she was actually doing something except weird facial expressions.

  • T

    I personally think Selena’s very pretty. Not hot or sexy, just pretty.

    I don’t get why anyone’s comparing her looks to those of super models either. It doesn’t make any sense as she nor anyone else is claiming that she looks like a super model….

    Anyway, I don’t really care for this shoot. Hate the faces she’s making (especially the “I’m so sexy” ones as those just don’t work for her…). That said, do think she looks good in the second pic. 🙂

    On another note, I don’t get this whole “skinny fat” business. I mean, I get what the term is referring to, but I think naming it that is ridiculous since “skinny fat” girls are in no way fat.

    Also, I personally envy the so-called “skinny fat” body more than any other. Women with these bodies can be very slim/skinny without looking a. malnourished/unhealthy with all their bones sticking out or b. overly muscular/toned to the point where their bodies are, in my opinion, too masculine.

  • Chris

    This is the cutest, prettiest, froggy faced fruit bat I’ve ever seen. No really she does look like those animals but is so adorable. She gets better looking the older she gets, too.

    I hope she sticks to acting and doesn’t go the super trashy, try-hard route to “grow up.” Hollywood’s version of becoming a woman is what we in the real world consider a cry for help from a broken girl with daddy issues.