Yeah, I know that we’re basically looking at 2 outfits, one lacking the jacket, but still worth posting.
Pic1: Super slim legs, opaque black stockings = slimming, flattering, must-have item.
Pic 2: Greek purple goddess-like, curves-hugging dress.
Pic3: Cute, but more a dress with more definition would have looked even hotter.
What are your thoughts?
Here are 2 ladies who decided to go out in the forever classy and forever flattering black dress!
Who’s Looks Better in this Dress? Kristin Cavallari VS Stacy Keibler!
And in case you were wondering about the height difference, know that Kristin is 5′2” and Stacy’s 5′11”.
Ashley Tisdale can be totally proud of her legs that work out magically if paired with a mini dress and some nude stilettos (and by “nude stilettos”, please read: The MUST HAVE shoes that have the most flattering “longer, slimmer legs” effect).
Same legs are looking rather skinny in a pair of wide and baggy jeans Ashley opted for during daytime.
Say your thoughts on Ashley’s day and night looks!
Looking at these pictures, I’ve got to say that Christina has got a huge potential to look HOT - with two conditions though:
1. Avoid wearing clothes that might qualify as “skanky” and go for simple, flattering lines.
2. No close-up on the vivid, vibrant, intense makeup.
Conclusion: The pictures above fulfill both requirements.
Verdict: HOT.
No no, I’m not referring to their bodies, but to their fitted, respectively puffy white dresses.
Which type of dress do you find more flattering?
The fitted dresses define your figure nicely, but they can reveal any minor flaws (lumps, bellies, bumps, rolls). Lucky Kate, she’s flaws-free.
The puffy dresses can make you look… a little puffy, but they can also hide all the imperfections (lumps, bellies, bumps, rolls) successfully.
Which dress would you rather wear? And who looked better last night? Kate Beckinsale Versus Jennifer Lopez!
|
|
|
