Skinny VS Curvy

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Here is a clear example on how clothes, in collaboration with one’s body type, can upgrade or downgrade a look. You might remember that a few days ago, Salma looked less gorgeous than she looks in this green dress at Cannes Festival - and no, her body did not change in a mater of days; her outfit did. Refresh my memory! Now there is no denying that the above dress is totally complimenting Salma’s hourglass shape, thus accentuating the hot spots known as cleavage, waist and hips.

How do you like Salma in this dress?

Salma Hayek has got perfect hourglass shape, let’s start from that. But is she as gorgeous as she can be in the above picture? Umm, nope. Why nope? Simply “thanks” to the clothes. Yes, it’s another one of those: body shape and clothes.

Firstly, Salma’s blouse and large boobs - a “no no”. Why? Because what the blouse does is that it creates the impression of the chest meeting the bellybutton. Next, Salma’s neck is not particularly long and lean - so the neck and the bow at its base is yet another big “no no” to put on the “what not to wear” list. Thirdly, we know that Salma lost the baby weight, but the chosen outfit almost, almost shows the contrary. What are your thoughts?

We already know that Kelly Brook is a true hourglass. This is why, when looking at pictures with her, there are two main attraction areas. Not this time - this time, the focus is on Kelly’s legs.

First of all and not at all weight-related, she must make up her mind: leather jacket with fur collar and naked legs - is she cold or is she hot? Regardless, her legs look, besides naked, slim and lean, not particularly toned (no, I am not saying being so is a must), pretty cellulite-free, except for some suspect minor shadows that might indicate the contrary.

How do you all like Kelly’s legs and overall body?

You might all recall that just a few (4, to be exact) days Jennifer aka “the one with the huge size 2 debate” looked pretty curvy or, better said, pretty and curvy in a dress that showed her best assets, as in boobs, waist and hips. Refresh my memory!

Not the case now. What this sparkly, shiny and glossy dress does is, besides shining and sparkling, it looks like a sack on what we know to be a “very hourglass body”. Now if you want a shiny, flashy sack, this is the way to go.

How do you all find Jennifer’s choice of clothes?

Versus’s expert advice: What are Jen’s best assets again? Boobs - ofh, can’t see them. Waist - what, where? Curvy hips - assuming they exist under all the fish scales.

So, first of all, I think we can all pretty much agree on the fact that Kelly Brook is a curvy girl. And no, by no means we mean that, in her case, curvy has flabby as a synonym, which, well, is an accomplishment - see Kim Kardashian, an exquisite exhibit in this case. Kelly Brook seems to be the epitome of an hourglass, you know, with all the bust and hips and waist combination she is spotting on - and, well, that is an accomplishment, as well, proudly exposed by the bikini she is wearing.

What do you guys think? Does Kelly’s body picture the ideal body type or not?