Skinny VS Curvy

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Summer dresses in vibrant colors and with floral patterns are everywhere these days, just like these types of flat sandals with multiple straps can be seen all around, even at fancy events. Furthermore, skinny legs are everywhere - no, not on the streets, but in Hollywood, even though not many celebrity legs are as pin thin as Sienna’s look right here. 

Well, I guess that when you are in a movie with Keira Knightley (who would make even Posh seem chubby), you’ve gotta put on your “skinniest look”.

How do you like Sienna in a mini dress? Would you advice her to add some extra meat on those skinny legs or not?

Photo credit: Fame

Let me make it easy for you:

Both girls are in their early 20’s, fact which makes them perfect competitors.

Both girls are wearing short white dresses that reveal their legs.

Cheryl is very skinny, Kristin is “just” skinny.

Both have skinny legs, but Kristin’s have a little more “consistence”.

Conclusion: Cheryl Cole versus Kristin Cavallari - Who’s got better legs?

Photo source: Celebutopia

Since debating on who rocks her bikini body, Kim or Kourtney, was so fun, why not introduce the third and younger Kardashian sister, Khloe, in the game? Too bad they are not in their bikinis this time - oh well, the tight dresses must be good enough. By the way, the highly popular bandage dresses like the one Kim’s wearing - wow or eww?

And now that we mentioned the dresses, Kim sure has a passion (besides her obvious passion for the uber tight ones) for the yellow dresses lately - but I must say that she looked quite a bit better in the one she wore previously - click here to see!

So, back to our competition: Who’s the hottest Kardashian in a tight dress? While on many previous red carpet occasions Kim managed to outshine both her sisters, I’m not quite sure this time. Kim, Kourtney or Khloe Kardashian?

P.S. Kim and Khloe wearing the exact same shoes.

Photo credit: Wenn

Wow, definitely looking better than here, especially since the old-lady posture and messy hair are gone. OK, the hair is not exactly perfect on the right, but it is definitely improved on the left. And so is the smile! At first we got all exited when Ashley started to trade the duck lips for smiling, so we should definitely applaud Mary-Kate for doing the same thing.

Even more improvement: remember the time Mary-Kate was wearing long and loose shirts or tops without… umm, pants on? Those days are ended and the mini dress days began, like the ones she wore this week.

How do you like Mary-Kate’s figure/dresses/new healthy look?

Photo source

I know that those multi-strappy shoes are so in fashion at this moment, but I also know that they cut the leg in four times (one time / strap, duh) - and no, that’s not recommendable unless you’ve got Kate Moss’s pin thin look. And while we can applaud the fact that Brit is looking more put together than usually, we could also applaud a little longer and much more flattering dress.

Now onto the real problem here: the hair. It definitely seems like it finally reached a length that could easily develop into a funky little short cut, with super appeal. Yet somehow, the long, uber-visible and generally uncombed hair extensions still survive on Britney’s head.

Photo source: ONTD

We’ve had wide ranges of young starlets who are in their 20’s in the body gossip spotlight, so how about changing the prefix for a change? Here we have Pamela Anderson, who is not  20, not 30, but 40 years old and judging by her legs, she doesn’t show it. OK, judging by her face, she does show it and yes, we can see other minor flaws, also known as “Angelina veiny arms”.

How do you like Pamela’s figure and looks?