In case you’re wondering about the height difference, Nicole is 5′10” and Ricki is 5′4”.
And in case you’re wondering about the age difference, Nicole is 41, while Ricki is 40.
There’s an obvious shape and size difference, so you get the picture:
Skinny VS Curvy Battle Time! Nicole Kidman VS Ricki Lake!
A few comments:
* Very reminiscent of 1999’s smiley, joyful, sweet Britney;
* Flawless skin, flawless hair, flawless shape - a little too flawless? A little too plasticised?
* Extra points for the warm & genuine smile.
How do you like Britney’s Circus cover?
To say it, not to say it, to say it… yeah, I’ll say it: Nicole has looked better. Before you scream and shout, let me mention that weight-wise, body-wise, shape-wise, she’s just right and I’m not spotting any problem.
But maybe some of you will agree that makeup-wise and hairstyle-wise, Nicole has made more jaw-dropping choices in the past.
Say your thoughts!
A close-up after the jump!
Already that famous that they don’t even need second names… Here are Lauren, Audrina and Lo, not looking all like pretty and perfect dolls posing in slimming positions - for a change. OK, so that was my number one reason for posting this.
And number two: just take a look at Lo’s, Lauren’s and Audrina’s legs in the second photo - because I didn’t realize until now that they have the exact same size, shape and skin tone. Yet another Photoshop job?
Photo credit: TV Guide
Rihanna sure has a passion for…let’s call them “innovative” shoes that come with outrageously high heels and multiple straps. These ones above, even though they are very original and… unique, they are not as… innovative as the pair she wore some weeks ago. In case you missed the beauties, click here.
Now even though these type of shoes that come with uncountable straps are not doing favors to shapely legs, Rihanna manages to pull them off pretty well on stage. What do you say?
Photo credit: AP
|
|
|
