Skinny VS Curvy

Of course I am going to mention the shoes. They are… interesting. “Millipede” comes to mind, don’t know exactly why - maybe because of the hundreds of  lines and straps?

Moving on from the shoes to the body talk, Rihanna says that she is 133 lbs and 5′8”, but also says that her weight varies, as well as her clothing size - which, by the way, varies between a 2 and a 4. I see her fit in a size 4 dress, but I am pretty sure she is can’t fit in size 2 pants.

What do you say? Is she being honest about her weight and size?

Photo source

They say that some days ago, Britney went inside the gym and then got out of the same gym 10 minutes later. What I am saying is that we probably shouldn’t expect Britney’s size 2 body to pop back over night, in case that’s that’s her usual workout regime.

Britney seems to be taking one step forward and one step back with her ”image recovery”. Now while the pounds are still on Britney, the the stains on the clothes were not, at least for a while. But in case you missed them, they are back, hopefully not here to stay.

If you were thinking that Lauren Conrad was a size 2, then this picture might prove you wrong. Sure, we can find explanations and justifications, such as the angle, the pants and the flip-flops are the villains that add weight and so on, but the first impression is that she looks slimmer on “The Hills” and, probably, on “heels”. Lauren might be doing what they are all doing in Hollywood, which is, besides making their hair blonde, gaining  weight when they are not filming their shows.

Not long ago, tabloids were saying that Lauren managed to go below 120 lbs (117) with the help of a 1500 calories / day diet. Now I am not sure (please read “totally doubt”) that Lauren is 119 lbs at 5′6” at the time of this candid (which was yesterday, by the way), but you can be the judge. So, what do you think? Are the numbers correct or not?

You might all recall that just a few (4, to be exact) days Jennifer aka “the one with the huge size 2 debate” looked pretty curvy or, better said, pretty and curvy in a dress that showed her best assets, as in boobs, waist and hips. Refresh my memory!

Not the case now. What this sparkly, shiny and glossy dress does is, besides shining and sparkling, it looks like a sack on what we know to be a “very hourglass body”. Now if you want a shiny, flashy sack, this is the way to go.

How do you all find Jennifer’s choice of clothes?

Versus’s expert advice: What are Jen’s best assets again? Boobs - ofh, can’t see them. Waist - what, where? Curvy hips - assuming they exist under all the fish scales.

No, no, of course we are not going to get into the “oh, so dramatic” Jennifer Love Hewitt size 2 debate, we are not even going to mention it. Oops, too late. What we can see here is, probably or possibly, Jennifer’s way on becoming the mentioned size, as in 2. To say it more directly, it seems that Jennifer is losing weight. Or is she simply tricking us by wearing what she knows looks best on her curvy and small waisted body?

What do you all think? Is this outfit flattering on Jennifer or is she trying to shed some pounds?

Lauren Conrad claims to be a size 2. Yeah? Prove it! Exhibit the tag on those jeans, would you, puh-lease? Other celebrities have claimed in the past they were a size 2 and yeah, they lie, so you, know, “fool me twice, shame on me”. Like really now, add 4 and admit you are a 6. Or an 8 for that matter. Or yeah, a size 2 in empire (or no) waist dresses made of flowy and elastic canvas that look more like drapes than like clothes.

What do you guys think? Does Lauren look close to a size 2?