And the Legs Belong to…
November 29, 2009 in Katie Price, Shakira, Take a Guess! by Versus
And the Legs Belong to…
Shakira and Katie Price! (no Nicole here)
32 and 31!
Surprised?
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
And the Legs Belong to…
16 Comments
Leave a Reply
nope
ahh shakira looks awesome
I guessed
ah i failed but i knew that wasn’t nicole richies tat , really annoying people refusin to accept that fact. And shakira has simular legs to Cheryl.
YAY I guessed that..
Shakiras legs look GREAT!
They look smooth, and she’s rocking a great tan, and best of all there not super skinny and bony. I think shes rocking it.
Katie is 31?! She looks as if her granddaughter is 31
haha, yeah I thought the same thing. she looks like an older woman trying to cling on to her youth.
Wow! Yeah, she is not aging well. Looks rough for 31!!!
not gunna lie…. katie has fab looking legs
This
they’re skinny.. but I wouldn’t call them “fab”
I personally prefer a less emaciated thigh, a bit more muscle on it. I kinda sorta guessed Shakira (cause I changed my mind afterwards
). However, never would’ve guessed Katie, coz I’m not familiar with her.
I agree with Jennah, Katie does have amazingly thin, tight and toned legs. I bet you could bounce a quarter off those things!
Shakira´s legs are terrible.I thought that she was thinner.She have shapeless thighs.
I have no idea who Katie Price is.
Wow katie has absurdly thin upper thighs and strong calves