Which Pair of Sisters Has the Best Legs?
March 28, 2010 in Body Comparisons, Take a Guess! by Versus
Double leggy battle!
Which Pair of Sisters Has the Best Legs?
Turn the page to see their owners (you probably figured them out already)!
First pair: Kim and Kourtney
Second pair: Pars and Nicky















the kardashians!
The Hiltons!
Kourtney and Nicky have the best.. As sisters-couple I would say the kardashians
Although my own look more like Paris and Nicky’s, I think the Kims have the better pair. Could be the healthy glow and softness I see.
Hiltons, but if it was a hair/face battle then I’d say the Kardashians
kourtney; a bit too tanned, but she has the best legs. the hiltons have weird legs, never liked them and kim is nothing special
The Hiltons, hands down. <3
I think Nicole and Paris look better than Kim and her sister , I can’t stand her
the kardashians
wats w/ paris’s legs ? O.o
The Hiltons, Nicky in particular.
I agree!
i don’t understand how someone could think that those legs are nice… they look a little sickly… the coloring and the size.
they’re horrible
They look fine, she’s naturally skinny & has refused to get a fake orange tan, which I like to see.
definitely the kardashians! hiltons’ look scary i don’t know why XD
Absolutely the Kardashians! They are just simply more beautiful than the Hiltons, they don’t have anything on the KKs
the Karsdashians, especially Kim’s. I’m surprised people actually like Nicky’s legs, they truly freak me out.
Kim and Kourt no one wants to look like the other celubutards oops I mean the hilton sisters
I think the Kardashians! great legs!
Hiltons! They just look so much more classy and chic.
Kim and Paris have the best legs. But out of the two, I prefer the Kardashians, mostly because I really dislike NIcky’s legs. However, out of everyone, Paris has the best legs.
the kardashians they have the best legs
Kim and Kourtney definitely. The Hilton’s legs look like skeleton’s.
Kardashians’ legs are much nicer.
Hiltons’ are bony and too skinny on the thighs.
kardasians. though kourtney could ease up on the tan a bit
OMG!!! Can this site stop talking all the freakin time about the Kardashians?!!
i don’t think so
LOL! They’re EVERYWHERE!
I’ll second that motion! Sooo sick of them.
No way the Hiltons do. Even though their legs are thin, they’re so unattractive. Those girls have the grossest body parts I’ve ever seen. Huge, bony feet, long arms, short, bony legs. Their knees and elbows protrude strangely. Really, they might not be homo sapiens. Something close but not quite the same.
I agree with you!
I tell in other articles about the Paris toes. And now i quote you: “bony feet, long arms, bony legs. Their knees and elbows protrude strangely”
It’s ok if somebody have this king of body gived by mother nature. Because they cannot help it, they can not make changes.
But!!! About the Hiltons … Everybody knows that fact: they are so skinny because they exagerate with loosing weight.
homo sapien=human
The Hiltons!
Hate myself supporting KK, but this time, yeah, the Kardashians!
Why, the Kardashians of course!
I like the Kourtney Kardashian’s legs simply because they’re shapely.
I’m also a bit surprised that some of the ladies on here like Nicky’s legs. I dunno…I think the reason I don’t like them is because I think your thighs should kinda touch when your knees are together. O_o
I thought Kim’s legs were Kourtney’s and Kim’s were Khole’s. The Hilton’s legs look so weird and sickly as someone said, when put in perspective.
Kardashians.
Kourtney’s legs are killer. Best out of the four.
I don’t like any of them.
Nicky’s of course, her sister’s got fugly legs
Kardashians hands down
Parishilton or the the hilton duh! kardashians for me are quite big already.
I vote for the kardashians.
Hiltons are just too skinny for my liking ;D
Kardashians for sure!
Can I just chose Kourtney’s?
The kardashians!
Not even a serious comparison, the Hilton sisters.
thankyou. Someone with a brain ^^
hiltons.. but all four make me feel sad for our country
Kardashians, hands down!
The Kardashian sisters have way better legs.
I like Kourtney’s the best! (though I agree they are too tanned)
The skinnier, the better. I like the Hilton’s, just not what they’re attached to.
The Hiltons. Hands down. Also, the Hiltons aren’t as faked tanned as the Kardashians.
…None of them
Kardashians: uneven
Hiltons: creepy, really creepy, and those feet! What size are they… 15?
Nicky.
The Kardashians! i don’t know why some girls loved Paris’ and Nicky’s legs! they are so skinny! they look like skeletons! I say curvier is sexier and healthier! for sure!
The Hiltons, in my opinion have always had awful legs. Kardashians <3
wow, definitly the kardashians after seeing these photos. It really kind of surprises me though, cuz without these leg close ups i totally would have said the hiltons.
Paris has the prettiest legs, then Kourtney, followed by Kim and finally Nicky. Overall I think the Hiltons have the sexier, though not necessarily the prettier, legs. There is no shame in them being so slender, or for the Karkashian girls is being obviously sturdier and stronger than the Hiltons. Paris and Kourtney especially have very prettily shaped thighs although the fragility of Paris’ slighter musculature gives her the edge in sex appeal. Nicky’s super-slight and fragile limbs are very sexy but they are not straight enough to match any of the other girls purely in terms of beauty. Kourtney has much better definitiion in her muscles than her sister, but the femininity of Kim’s soft thighs is very attractive.
My vote for Paris Hilton
Kim and Kourtney!