Lea Michele

Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

GQ Magazine placed Glee stars Dianna, Lea and Cory on their cover next to the title: ‘What happens when the teachers aren’t around’ – what happens is that schoolgirls show off their panties and bras, seductively consume lollipops and spread their legs in the locker room… apparently. The GQ feature received a lot of criticism already – here’s the scoop from Us Weekly:

GQ’s sexy Glee cover has gone too far, The Parents Television Council says. In a statement released Wednesday, the group slams the November issue, which features Cory Monteith, 28, Dianna Agron and Lea Michele, both 24 – all of whom play highschoolers on the hit Fox show – wearing hardly any clothing.

“It is disturbing that GQ, which is explicitly written for adult men, is sexualizing the actresses who play high school-aged characters on Glee in this way. It borders on pedophilia,” the statement reads. By authorizing this kind of near-pornographic display, the creators of the program have established their intentions on the show’s direction,” the statement concludes. “And it isn’t good for families.”

What does Lea Michele have to say about the racy shoot?

“I don’t know how they got me to do half the stuff I did” for the GQ shoot, said Michele. “But I was in really good shape this summer, so…”

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-2 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Must share your thoughts!

P.S.: I guess we can all recognize the photographer here: Terry Richardson.

So many more shots on the second page!

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-3 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-4 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-5 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-6 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-7 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-8 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Dianna-Agron-and-Lea-Michele-GQ-9 - Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ

Incoming search terms:

Dianna agron naked, dianna agron topless, Dianna Agron b~~~~, diana agron naked, naughty schoolgirls, Dianna Agron t~~~, lea michele gq, dianna agron lingerie, lea michele cq, dianna agron panties
Previous ArticleNext Article
Editor of Skinny vs Curvy Website

Leave a Reply

95 Comments on "Dianna Agron and Lea Michele Are Naughty Schoolgirls in GQ"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Anara
Guest
Anara

I don’t like them at all!

pusha
Guest
pusha

i think it’s hot. everything. hot!

Isabela
Guest
Isabela

u read this blog too? nice 😛

Victoria
Guest
Victoria

I think it makes the “sex appeal” of society satirical…that’s just what I take from it. I also find it kind of cute.

emely
Guest
emely

i share your opinion. also, they’re grown-ups- here they are depicted as actresses, not as the characters they play on the show. the point is not to sexualize the high school kids they display on tv, gq just happens to be a men’s magazine where borderline-erotic photography is often featured. the magazine’s target demographic is adult men, not the teenagers who watch glee. as a fan of the show, i see nothing inappropriate about this.

Effie
Guest
Effie

I agree, there’s nothing inappropriate about it.

It’s just bad taste (in my personal opinion), but then again I might be influenced by all the horrific stories about the photographer.

Chloe
Guest
Chloe

Lea Michele looks hot! So different from her usual image

padme
Guest
padme

It’s pretty gross for sure. Not surprising though.

tink
Guest
tink

I don’t find it sexy. They photoshopped Lea’s legs weirdy in the pic where she is sitting on the bench.

monkey
Guest
monkey

me neither, i mean seriously, their characters not sexy, so all i think when i see these this is rachel trying to be sexy and it doesn’t work for me. I find it funny though how lea seems to be enjoying this so much while diana is like, well i guess i’ll do this lol

Miichh
Guest
Miichh

my thoughts exactly! lea seems like shes enjoying it so much and diana is kind of like, okay, lets finish this up…haha i guess because leas character is so conservative on the show

Alana
Guest
Alana

They did terrible photoshopping, they both look a bit chunky in some shots. Not a fan :/

Pie
Guest

Where are Lea Michelle’s feet? In the picture where she’s sitting on the guy’s shoulders.. Lol

southerngumdrops
Guest
southerngumdrops

they’re tucked behind his arms. i used to cheer and you have to do this to hold yourself in place

Marianis
Guest
Marianis

Omg you are right one is behind the arm but the other one is totally not there…bad photoshop or just weird angle? (i mean the one on Diana’s side)

helen
Guest
helen

Not sexy, it looks cheap. The quality of the photos, the lightening, the poses- cheap.
And besides: this “hot schoolgirl”- thing is just wrong. They play teenagers in a show and are posing in their underwear at a school. What do they want to say: underaged girls are sexy? Not cool.

summer-roseq
Guest
summer-roseq

*lighting

artemis
Guest
artemis

well i am

Eeva
Guest
Eeva

You mean you’re underaged and sexy?

In that case I’d have to say; Me too!!

RAchel
Guest
RAchel

Agreed, Although people are complaining far too much about this, there’s sleazier and worse things out there, this is still very cheap. kinda goes to show that every, literally everyone is going naked and dressing up like a s— just for attention.

ginger
Guest
ginger

Well it’s kinda hot.. but I don’t know what the objective was.. I mean.. yeah, to turn men on.. but if the tv show’s not about that, then WHY putting it all about sex in such explicit ways?

BTW I find Lea’s comment funny.. like “I don’t know how they got me to do this” but she looks so comfy doing it.. I beat she didn’t have to be pushed at all… LOL

Charle
Guest
Charle

It’s sexual enough to make me uncomfortable (compared to other clean sexy photoshoots, for example VS models in lingerie – where I often don’t feel the sex appeal, just appreciate the female body).

The quality feeling “cheap” adds to this effect, I think.

summer-roseq
Guest
summer-roseq

dianna argon is doing the same face in every pic. lea looks smokin’…and slightly like a pro p— star?

Effie
Guest
Effie
Glee is not supposed to be an educational children’s programme and teenagers have seen the s—ty schoolgirl outfit many a time in movies, magazines and video clips so I don’t think psychological scarring is the issue… I think teenagers have enough discernment to see the cynical humour of the shoot and perhaps the underlying reference to the fact that well into their mid-to-late-twenties the actors play 16-year-olds. That being said, I find the shoot generic and lacking any creativity or taste. I love that Dianna Agron seems to have refused to wear anything less than a skirt. Terry Richardson is… Read more »
lp23
Guest
lp23

I agree!

It is on at 9pm anyway.

Guest
sara

actually you can totally see dianna’s panties on the 5th pic (although not here,i’ve seen the photos in hq on another site) which i think it looks way more ‘perverted’ than lea’s half naked pictures XD

Lauren
Guest
Lauren

LOL! WTF happened to Lea’s feet in the second last photo? Major fail!

southerngumdrops
Guest
southerngumdrops

they’re tucked behind his arms to help hold her in place

Lauren
Guest
Lauren

No, the other fott which looks like it’s going through Dianna’s leg…

lp23
Guest
lp23

I never thought in a million years you would see Lea Michelle do these type of photoshoots.

They all look hot.

ellentjie
Guest
ellentjie

I think I’ve gone off Lea Michele, she seems a bit full of herself and a lot like her Glee character. I like Dianna Agron who never seems to be talking about herself all the time

woopidoo
Guest
woopidoo

agree

Katheryn
Guest
Katheryn

was about to say the same thing myself! Lea sure is on a high of feeling good about herself…

flossy
Guest
flossy
I kinda see where you’re coming from she’s certainly getting a lot of media coverage more so than the other cast members. But I don’t think she’s full of herself I think it’s just her way of saying “up yours” to all the agents and people in the industry who said she wasn’t pretty that she had a big nose, big lips her look wasn’t sellable and she’d never get work as an actress. Very much a “look at me now suckers” and she’s fairly open about the painful rejection she’s experienced and the hurtful comments. Good luck to her… Read more »
Daniel
Guest
Daniel

Lea is NOT sexy. Take this lady out MY (I mean, men) mags and bring her back to girl mags. Seriously, she is NOT sexy. I can’t help it, I don’t like her at all (physically, I mean).

artemis
Guest
artemis

agree 🙂

bigvinamac
Guest

why am i not surprised? lea should be in a men’s magazine and if it bothers you that bad then don’t pay attention.

lc
Guest

Daniel, I can see your point this time!! SO true.

maddie
Guest
maddie

i am 17 and i seriously don’t get why everyone is so annoyed by this…..teenagers are sexualised and they have sex these days…nothing is going to stop that…..just because it’s a high school themed shoot doesn’t mean it’s peodophilic to be in a mens magazine……why is everyone so straight edged and oh no sensor everything!

kate
Guest
kate

what body shape is lea?
i’m the same shape (narrow hips, thicker legs and a waist but not a teeny tiny one) but i have bigger b❆❆bs and a bigger butt. so what shape does that sound like? thanks!!

Kate1st
Guest
Kate1st

Man, that Terry Richardson is a mega pervert!

Trace
Guest
Trace
I think this is a bit tacky, but not inappropriate. They did the photoshoot and interview as themselves and they are not teenagers in real life. Lea is 24 and so is Dianna, so they’re totally free to do a raunchy photoshoot for a men’s magazine if they want to. But personally, I really don’t like these pictures. They look like a cheap American Apparell add. Plus I don’t appreciate the way the women have been completely sexualized and stripped half naked, while the only man is fully clothed. But hey, it’s CQ magazine and Terry Richardson so what else… Read more »
Erica
Guest
Erica
I agree that it’s a step too far – but then I think a lot of portrayals of women in the media are too much now. Often they end up looking like strippers or p— stars and I don’t think that’s a good message to be sending to the young teenagers who idolise them. Can’t they act a bit more classy? I don’t mean that they should be prudish and cover everything up – but is it really necessary to basically do a photoshoot in panties, socks and a barely there top? I just think it’s sad that so many… Read more »
Natasha
Guest
Natasha
I have no problems whatsoever with the spread except for the one shot with Lea’s legs open because it looks cheap which I find funny being that I don’t mind when girls in these types of spreads/shoots are topless or nude. I don’t think the spread merit of receiving criticism when the show itself doesn’t shy away from teen issues like when Dianna was supposedly pregnant or Heather and Naya “slept together” or Chris having a crush on Cory. Nor is Diana or Lea underage jail bait thus this show isn’t exactly Hannah Montana or Wizards of Waverly Place. I… Read more »
Natasha
Guest
Natasha

*is merit*

Vic
Guest

what a talentless hack terry richardson is..

Dawn0
Guest

I honestly can understand that yes, they’re adults and this is to represent themselves as sexy actors/actresses, however I truly think it’s the styling of the shoot that has everyone upset. If they were wearing couture or the set theme had been different, people wouldn’t be saying they’re condoning pedophilia. I think they took the theme of the show too far and in poor taste. Besides, you can tell Lea is loving the attention no matter what the context, “but I was in really good shape…” please.

Brit
Guest
Brit

The shots look hot and they are both beautiful women. However, I can’t help but to think how much we over sexualize women, instead of focusing on their talent. I certainly don’t see amy pics of the boy with his shirt off in sexy poses; it is as if the media and society itself reminds women that it all comes down to how you look.

Mia
Guest

they should have had more photos of the boy, he’s cute!! I might have to start watching Glee 🙂

Emma
Guest
Emma

There is a hotter one: Puck.
And a new blonde kid but looks kinda girly.

Calro
Guest
Calro

Does anyone else feel like this is an American Apparel ad? I’m so over this style of photography. At first it looked different from their TV personas and I thought it was kinda sexy…..then I felt a feeling of deja vu…..it’s not edgy if it’s been done a million times already

Alexa@Living La Vida Pura
Guest
Calro
Guest
Calro

Hahaha….I so agree with you on this one.

lc
Guest

Umm, woah.

Casey
Guest
Casey

I don’t think it borders on pedophillia. That’s really reaching for straws. These actresses are in their 20’s and clearly look like it. And the whole naughty schoolgirl/cheerleader thing has been used a million times before this.

Nevertheless, it’s a tacky photoshoot, but what did we expect from Terry Richardson the perv. What great “message” is he trying to convey through his “art” this time?

jess
Guest
jess

Why, why WHY do women feel like they HAVE to do these tacky, s—ty photoshoots to make it? My hell, is this hollywood or softcore p—. Both, I guess. I really, really hate this trend with female actresses losing all respect for themselves when men’s magazines come calling. So lame.

Erica
Guest
Erica

Agreed!

Mia
Guest
Yes, they are adults and they should be considered independently of the characters they play on TV. BUT, whenver you put women in underwear and s—ty outfits in a school setting (as this shoot does) you are crossing a fine line…We can’t deny that there is this sexualized image of school girls in s—ty uniforms and white underwear, and this photoshoot is playing right into that – and purposefully so. I think that’s what gives this shoot such a cheap feel too, it’s like something you would expect to see in a soft-p— magazine…sexy school girls gone wild. On the… Read more »
CK
Guest
i don’t see anything disturbing in these pics, the theme of sexy schoolgirls has been and is used widely in magazines, but in general this particular shoot looks cheap, that’s the only word that gets in my head when i look at the pics. As for the Parents council, well, they just too lazy for parenting their kids themselves so instead they go around looking for role models and slamming smth that their kids actually think is “no big deal”, i mean there is much worse stuff they see on the internet and i doubt every and each horrible thing… Read more »
fitgirl
Guest
fitgirl

lea looks cheap, diana looks good. i agree w comment above that diana doesn’t talk about herself constantly and that makes her more attractive

kya
Guest

i don’t see the big deal i think its hot and it made me laugh.. people need to stop taking life so seriously.

Jennifer
Guest
Jennifer

Versus,
What body type would you say Dianna is? I have a similar shape except a larger bust and short legs (like Katy Perry). Thanks 🙂

P.S. I’m 5’2

Emma
Guest
Emma

Im tired of sexy and provocative things,Its just lame and cliche.I think there is enough p—ographic materiala nd women degradation in the world.
Thankfully Im old enough to see how wrong is this,but 13 year old girls will think that taking your clothes is necesary to succeed in life.

mia
Guest

HOT

Jemima
Guest
Jemima

I cannot stand Terry Richardson. Nearly softcore p— with bad lighting. And a lot of the photos aren’t even in focus! The shoot feels cheap and it is “sexy” to the point where it makes me feel uncomfortable (and it takes quite a bit to make me feel uncomfortable about a photoshoot.). Legs spread, straight to camera in panties = not what I personally want to see.
Dianna and Lea have nice bodies, but I don’t get why Lea is always pantless. Why is everyone always pantless? Can no one afford pants anymore?

Polly
Guest
Polly

I cannot believe Cory is 28! I think it’s a hot shoot, it’s for a men’s magazine after all.

Randi
Guest
Randi

I’ve read Dianna’s apology and I’m wondering if maybe this was some sort of contractual thing. I really don’t think Dianna would do this… Lea, yeah, but not Dianna. She always is so modest and well put together. Makes me wonder.

wonderwoman21
Guest
wonderwoman21
I think its tacky, it lacks tastes, and isn’t really so much erotic as it is just sleazy. There were a lot of better ways to do this shoot, that crotch shot of Lea Michele is just horrendously pathetic and I’d be ashamed if I were her. Looks like she got carried away trying to look overly sexual because she’s so used to being the ‘ugly duckling’. I’m not saying she’s ugly, I think she’s pretty, but I kind of read into it like she was desperate to show this side of her and ultimately ended up with tasteless raunchy… Read more »
Aafje
Guest
Aafje

I just want to know why the girls are in their underwear and they guy is fully clothed. We need to objectify everyone equally!!

Minnie
Guest
Minnie

Maybe because it’s a men’s magazine.

kelsi
Guest
kelsi

lol i just wish cory m. would’ve shown some skin too!

Nay
Guest

hhmm… I’m a bit torn apart on this one because I DO think they look really hot and is not that sexy to make me uncomfortable but I kind of get the rage about the pedophilia thing ’cause lets be honest they don’t look like your typical 20 somethings they do look somewhere childish specially on their boobless and not much curvy bodyS ANYWAYS I like the pictures, I like them.

lc
Guest

Lame, cheap, and sleazy. All THREE of them are completely and utterly unattractive, anyhow.

anonymous
Guest
anonymous

astonishing. she doesn’t know how they got her to pose like that?
she looks completely at ease and extremely comfortable doing all of these things. it looks like she wanted to do it.
they are grown ups and they’re allowed to do what they want to do.
but so many kids watch glee.
dianna argon looks 1000x more modest than lea. i heard that she didn’t want to do this shoot. but who knows? shes hasn’t but as much into it as lea did.
lea is welcome to express her sexuality. but doesn’t it seem like shes degrading women?

Ashley
Guest
Ashley

I hate how women are willingly degrading themselves. Why is there no self respect? Sexy, not s—ty girls.

Desta
Guest
Desta

sure this is “inappropriate”. i mean there’s nothing appropriate about it when put in societies standards. but put in GQ’s standards it’s normal.

and personally, i think this whole thing is HOT. no other way to put it.

udkcoco
Guest
udkcoco

@randi her apology seemed kind of tongue in cheek to me. She’s like… Why would your kids have mens’ magazines anyway? *paraphrase*
The shoots ok. At least they’re not all greased up, like mens’ mags usually do.

Em
Guest

I don’t have a very fresh statement to make about the spread – lot of great comments here already. I will say that it annoys me when people end their sentences with “so………” 🙂 (per the quote “I don’t know how they got me to do half the stuff I did” for the GQ shoot, said Michele. “But I was in really good shape this summer, so…”)

I think Lea Michele looks cute and young and carefree. The shots are tacky but I think that is the point. It’s very campy to me.

wpDiscuz